• Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer

While it costs about the same

This topic has 7 expert replies and 14 member replies
Goto page
  • 1,
  • 2
Next
aditya8062 Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
23 Jan 2012
Posted:
774 messages
Followed by:
14 members
Thanked:
46 times

While it costs about the same

Post Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:10 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.

    A. While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes it more expensive for them to generate electricity.
    B While the cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as for other types of power plants, the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants make the electricity they generate more expensive.
    C. Even though it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, it is the fixed costs that stem from building nuclear plants that makes the electricity they generate more expensive.
    D. It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as for other types of power plants, whereas the electricity they generate is more expensive, stemming from the fixed costs of building nuclear plants.
    E. The cost of running nuclear plants is about the same as other types of power plants, but the electricity they generate is made more expensive because of the fixed costs stemming from building nuclear plants.


    my doubt : while i do understand that A is wrong for many other reason but plz confirm whether the initial comparison in A is oki :While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:22 am
    aditya8062 wrote:
    my doubt : while i do understand that A is wrong for many other reason but plz confirm whether the initial comparison in A is oki :While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants
    ELLIPSIS is the omission of words whose presence is understood.
    Here, it is not crystal clear what words have been omitted.
    A reader might make the following interpretation:
    While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants [cost]...
    The intended comparison is as follows:
    While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as [to run] other types of power plants...
    Since a reader might be confused, eliminate the answer choice.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    aditya8062 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    23 Jan 2012
    Posted:
    774 messages
    Followed by:
    14 members
    Thanked:
    46 times
    Post Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:45 am
    thanks a lot guru
    but plz tell me when u say that one of the interpretation is :While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants [cost]..
    isn't "cost to run" understood in this interpretation (what is preventing us to consider this ellipses )

    also if i put the comparison as :: nuclear power plants cost twice as much to run as other power plants
    then i believe this ambiguity does not arise
    plz tell me what can be the reason ?
    thanks and regards

    spark Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
    Joined
    15 Aug 2010
    Posted:
    28 messages
    Followed by:
    3 members
    Thanked:
    5 times
    GMAT Score:
    760
    Post Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:30 pm
    The meaning of the sentence is different if you insert "cost to run" instead of "cost" at the end of the comparison. If a sentence uses an implicitly understood word or phrase, there should be no doubt about what the intended word or phrase is.

    Also, the "it costs" construction, which is described with a variety of terminology (placeholder it, syntactic expletive, or emphatic construction), is not technically incorrect on its own, but this type of construction makes answer A a bit awkward.

    As I believe you saw, the subject-verb agreement error ("fixed costs...makes") makes it easier to eliminate answer A.

    _________________
    Stuart Park
    Simply Brilliant
    Stuart is a Harvard grad GMAT expert who scored 760 the first time he took the exam, with 99th percentile quant and verbal scores. He has extensive experience teaching for one of the "elite" GMAT prep companies. Through http://www.simplybrilliantprep.com he offers online classes, private tutoring and MBA application consulting for clients worldwide.

    aditya8062 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    23 Jan 2012
    Posted:
    774 messages
    Followed by:
    14 members
    Thanked:
    46 times
    Post Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:50 pm
    thanks spark but plz tell is this comparison oki : nuclear power plants cost twice as much to run as other power plants

    Post Wed Mar 20, 2013 9:10 am
    aditya8062 wrote:
    thanks a lot guru
    but plz tell me when u say that one of the interpretation is :While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants [cost]..
    isn't "cost to run" understood in this interpretation (what is preventing us to consider this ellipses )
    It must be CRYSTAL CLEAR what words have been omitted and what meaning is implied.
    In the second clause, a reader could interpret other types as the subject of the implied verb cost or as the direct object of to run:
    Other types of power plants cost about the same.
    To run other types of power plants costs about the same
    .
    Since a reader might misinterpret the intended meaning, look for an answer choice that makes the comparison clear.

    Quote:
    also if i put the comparison as :: nuclear plants cost twice as much to run as other types of power plants
    then i believe this ambiguity does not arise
    plz tell me what can be the reason ?
    thanks and regards
    Here, it's clear that other types of power plants serves as the subject of the second clause.
    The GMAT might add a verb to the second clause, as in SC89 in the OG12:
    Dirt roads cost twice as much to maintain as paved roads DO.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.



    Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:15 am; edited 2 times in total

    Thanked by: aditya8062
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    aditya8062 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    23 Jan 2012
    Posted:
    774 messages
    Followed by:
    14 members
    Thanked:
    46 times
    Post Wed Mar 20, 2013 10:36 am
    thanks a lot Guru
    Quote:
    guru said :In your example, it's clear that what NUCLEAR PLANTS COST is being compared what OTHER TYPES OF POWER PLANTS COST.
    But by making nuclear plants and other types of power plants the subjects, you imply that the PLANTS THEMSELVES are being compared.
    but plz tell me in the sentence i wrote : nuclear plants cost twice as much to run as other types of power plants

    i have included "to run" (bolded) so why have u said that i am just comparing the NUCLEAR PLANTS COST with OTHER TYPES OF POWER PLANTS COST
    i guess that "to run" is taking care to show that its the cost to run these plant thats being compared

    plz guide me Mitch

    Post Wed Mar 20, 2013 11:18 am
    aditya8062 wrote:
    thanks a lot Guru
    but plz tell me in the sentence i wrote : nuclear plants cost twice as much to run as other types of power plants

    i have included "to run" (bolded) so why have u said that i am just comparing the NUCLEAR PLANTS COST with OTHER TYPES OF POWER PLANTS COST
    i guess that "to run" is taking care to show that its the cost to run these plant thats being compared

    plz guide me Mitch
    Please see my amended post above.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    aditya8062 Legendary Member Default Avatar
    Joined
    23 Jan 2012
    Posted:
    774 messages
    Followed by:
    14 members
    Thanked:
    46 times
    Post Wed Mar 20, 2013 8:14 pm
    thanks a lot Mitch

    Quote:
    Please see my amended post above.
    i somehow get the feeling that the whole answer to this riddled sentence lies in ur last amended post especially this line : :Here, it's clear that other types of power plants serves as the subject of the second clause. . i feel because the sentence---nuclear plants cost twice as much to run as other types of power plants --- is so parallel in terms of subject -verb- object order that the construction after as is also deemed as subject .hence this construction does not create any ambiguity and we are able to compare the cost of running the nuclear power plant with the cost of running the other power plant

    now
    for this sentence --While it costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants ---such parallelism does not exist and hence the portion after as can act as a subject or as an object and hence the ambiguity that u told does exists

    Quote:
    mitch told :The GMAT might add a verb to the second clause, as in SC89 in the OG12:
    yeah thanks for putting that reference as i was about to come on this but Mitch what i guess is that version of this sentence without the working verb might just work well and gmat might test that
    Mitch kindly corroborate my understanding

    voodoo_child Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    10 Feb 2011
    Posted:
    404 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Post Wed May 22, 2013 11:05 am
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    It must be CRYSTAL CLEAR what words have been omitted and what meaning is implied.
    In the second clause, a reader could interpret other types as the subject of the implied verb cost or as the direct object of to run:
    Other types of power plants cost about the same.
    To run other types of power plants costs about the same
    .
    Since a reader might misinterpret the intended meaning, look for an answer choice that makes the comparison clear.

    Hello Mitch,
    About D) - do you think it could be interpreted as "It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as it costs for the other types of power plants to run nuclear plants "

    apoorva.rattan Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    07 Oct 2009
    Posted:
    55 messages
    Post Wed May 22, 2013 3:04 pm
    What is the OA for this question, though ? Is it E ?

    ramitagrawal Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    26 Mar 2013
    Posted:
    35 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    2 times
    Post Thu May 23, 2013 4:03 am
    IMO: B....Please post OA..

    Thanks!

    iongmat Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    24 May 2011
    Posted:
    184 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    6 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    710
    Post Thu Jul 31, 2014 9:17 pm
    Hello Mitch, after going thru your posts above, I believe following is what you recommend:

    (I) Nuclear plants cost twice as much to run as other types of power plants

    This is a correct sentence, since it can only be interpreted in one way:

    Nuclear plants cost twice as much to run as other types of power plants (cost to run)

    (II) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants

    This is an incorrect sentence, since it can only be interpreted in two ways:

    (a) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants (cost)
    (b) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants (cost to run)


    Is my understanding of your recommendation correct? I am having difficulty in appreciating how we can infer (a) above; how we can just stop at "cost" and not assume "cost to run".

    Post Sat Aug 02, 2014 3:08 pm
    iongmat wrote:
    Hello Mitch, after going thru your posts above, I believe following is what you recommend:

    (I) Nuclear plants cost twice as much to run as other types of power plants

    This is a correct sentence, since it can only be interpreted in one way:

    Nuclear plants cost twice as much to run as other types of power plants (cost to run)

    (II) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants

    This is an incorrect sentence, since it can only be interpreted in two ways:

    (a) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants (cost)
    (b) It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants (cost to run)


    Is my understanding of your recommendation correct? I am having difficulty in appreciating how we can infer (a) above; how we can just stop at "cost" and not assume "cost to run".
    It costs about the same to run nuclear plants as other types of power plants.
    Here, we cannot assume the presence of cost to run in the second clause because this phrase does not appear in the first clause.
    In the phrase cost to run, to run serves as a modifier.
    But in the first clause, to run serves not as a modifier but as part of the SUBJECT.
    In the first clause, it is an expletive standing in for the infinitive subject to run nuclear plants.
    First clause: It costs about the same to run nuclear plants.
    Conveyed meaning: To run nuclear plants costs about the same.
    As you can see, the phrase cost to run is not included in the conveyed meaning.
    Thus, we can not assume the presence of this phrase in the second clause.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    iongmat Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    24 May 2011
    Posted:
    184 messages
    Followed by:
    1 members
    Thanked:
    6 times
    Target GMAT Score:
    710
    Post Sun Aug 03, 2014 9:13 pm
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    First clause: It costs about the same to run nuclear plants.
    Conveyed meaning: To run nuclear plants costs about the same.
    Hello Mitch, even if this is the conveyed, meaning the sentence would be:

    To run nuclear plants costs about the same as (to run) other types of power plants (costs).

    This seems ok to me. So, why is it incorrect?

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 61 topics
    4 ardz24 40 topics
    5 VJesus12 14 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    160 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    102 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    99 posts
    4 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

    Manhattan Review

    86 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    80 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts