• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to $200 Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Veritas GMAT Class Experience Lesson 1 Live Free Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Trial & Practice Exam BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Free Practice Test & Review How would you score if you took the GMAT Available with Beat the GMAT members only code ## When there is less rainfall This topic has 3 expert replies and 5 member replies Amadalia Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 20 Jan 2014 Posted: 76 messages Thanked: 3 times #### When there is less rainfall Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:59 am Elapsed Time: 00:00 • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME]) When there is less rainfall than normal, the water level of Australian rivers falls and the rivers flow more slowly. Because algae whose habitat is river water grow best in slow-moving water, the amount of algae per unit of water generally increases when there has been little rain. By contrast, however, following a period of extreme drought, algae levels are low even in very slow-moving river water. Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the contrast described above? (A) During periods of extreme drought, the populations of some of the species that feed on algae tend to fall. (B) The more slowly water moves, the more conducive its temperature is to the growth of algae. (C) When algae populations reach very high levels, conditions within the river can become toxic for some of the other species that normally live there. (D) Australian rivers dry up completely for short intervals in periods of extreme drought. (E) Except during periods of extreme drought, algae levels tend to be higher in rivers in which the flow has been controlled by damming than in rivers that flow freely. the OA is D but I'm not really convinced why? "By contrast, however, following a period of extreme drought, algae levels are low even in very slow-moving river water[/u]. this sentence makes me think that the presence of water is necessary and answerD is completly out of scope. the answer Emakes sens as it said that in period of [u]extreme drought the algae prefer the flow freely river!!! Many thanks in advance!!!! Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums! bubbliiiiiiii Legendary Member Joined 14 Apr 2009 Posted: 971 messages Followed by: 12 members Thanked: 48 times Test Date: 18.10.2012 Target GMAT Score: 760 GMAT Score: 700 Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:01 am The question stem states that: During low rain than normal the water flow is slow, stimulating algae growth. However, following extreme drought algae growth is low even in slow moving river water. To resolve the contrast, there should be some additional requirement, besides slow moving water, for algae growth. That could be minerals from fresh rain water, appropriate water level, even in slow moving waters, etc. Option D hits the contrast by pointing completely dry rivers, hinting to low water levels. Why not E: E talks about the period EXCEPT during drought, a period irrelevant to our discussion. Hope it helps. _________________ Regards, Pranay ### GMAT/MBA Expert ceilidh.erickson GMAT Instructor Joined 04 Dec 2012 Posted: 1633 messages Followed by: 224 members Thanked: 1419 times Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:27 am When you have a CR problem that asks you to EXPLAIN A DISCREPANCY, it's usually in this format: It's generally true that ______. Normally, you'd think this would mean ______. In this case, though, _______. In this case: It's generally true that less rainfall = slow rivers, and slow river = algae. Normally, you'd think this would mean that drought = more algae. In this case, though, extreme drought = low algae levels. We need to find an answer that 1) keeps the original conditions true, and 2) supports the surprising outcome. Avoid answer choices that try to undermine the premises or support the expected outcome. The key is to find an answer that addresses the difference that EXTREME drought makes versus normal drought conditions. (A) During periods of extreme drought, the populations of some of the species that feed on algae tend to fall. This supports the expected outcome - if algae-eaters decline, there should be MORE algae. (B) The more slowly water moves, the more conducive its temperature is to the growth of algae. This explains why the premise (slow water = high algae) is true, but doesn't explain the surprising outcome. (C) When algae populations reach very high levels, conditions within the river can become toxic for some of the other species that normally live there. Other species are irrelevant (D) Australian rivers dry up completely for short intervals in periods of extreme drought. If the rivers dry up completely in EXTREME drought, then the rivers aren't just slow-moving - they don't exist anymore! The habitat that the algae lives in ceases to exist, so much of the algae would die. This keeps the original conditions true, and explains the surprising answer. Correct. (E) Except during periods of extreme drought, algae levels tend to be higher in rivers in which the flow has been controlled by damming than in rivers that flow freely. Any answer that starts "except during extreme drought" can't possibly tell us what it is about extreme drought that makes things different. This also just supports the given premise: slow rivers = high algae. It does nothing to explain why extreme drought = low algae. To your question: Quote: "By contrast, however, following a period of extreme drought, algae levels are low even in very slow-moving river water[/u]. this sentence makes me think that the presence of water is necessary and answerD is completly out of scope. You're absolutely right! The presence of water is necessary for algae growth - but that actually makes D totally relevant, not out of scope. Generally speaking, we don't want to think of "scope" the same way on EXPLAIN DISCREPANCY questions as we do on other CR questions. The right answer will always be a new piece of information, and it's ok if it feels out-of-the-blue. It just has to keep the original conditions and the surprising outcome true. _________________ Ceilidh Erickson Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education Harvard Graduate School of Education Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience. Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry! Thanked by: Amadalia, moumi2013 Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week. ### GMAT/MBA Expert ceilidh.erickson GMAT Instructor Joined 04 Dec 2012 Posted: 1633 messages Followed by: 224 members Thanked: 1419 times Mon Apr 21, 2014 7:30 am _________________ Ceilidh Erickson Manhattan Prep GMAT & GRE instructor EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education Harvard Graduate School of Education Manhattan Prep instructors all have 99th+ percentile scores and expert teaching experience. Sign up for a FREE TRIAL, and learn why we have the highest ratings in the GMAT industry! Thanked by: Amadalia, appy_fizz Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week. ### GMAT/MBA Expert David@VeritasPrep GMAT Instructor Joined 22 Feb 2010 Posted: 2193 messages Followed by: 507 members Thanked: 1186 times GMAT Score: 770 Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:21 am Amadalia - Others have already discussed this question, but I just wanted to point out the two most important words in the question: "short intervals" Choice D says: (D) Australian rivers dry up completely for short intervals in periods of extreme drought. I see that what you are thinking is - if the river is dry then there is no water! But what D is saying is not that the river stays dry, but that most of the time there is water and sometimes for brief periods the river dries up completely. It must be that this kills the algae. It is like saying that working women earn less than men in the U.S. And the answer choice says "Women often leave the workforce for SHORT INTERVALS." So these are still working women even if they are not employed for a few months here or there...so it is not out of scope and maybe leaving the workforce for even a short time sort of stalls or resets your career. So that would explain. Hope it helps! _________________ Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor Veritas Prep Reviews Save$100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!
Kamal2014 Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
12 May 2014
Posted:
22 messages
GMAT Score:
730
Tue May 13, 2014 5:55 am
When there is less rainfall than normal, the water level of Australian rivers falls and the rivers flow more slowly. Because algae whose habitat is river water grow best in slow-moving water, the amount of algae per unit of water generally increases when there has been little rain. By contrast, however, following a period of extreme drought, algae levels are low even in very slow-moving river water.

Which of the following, if true, does most to explain the contrast described above?

(A) During periods of extreme drought, the populations of some of the species that feed on algae tend to fall.
(B) The more slowly water moves, the more conducive its temperature is to the growth of algae.
(C) When algae populations reach very high levels, conditions within the river can become toxic for some of the other species that normally live there.
(D) Australian rivers dry up completely for short intervals in periods of extreme drought.
(E) Except during periods of extreme drought, algae levels tend to be higher in rivers in which the flow has been controlled by damming than in rivers that flow freely.

the OA is D but I'm not really convinced why?
"By contrast, however, following a period of extreme drought, algae levels are low even in very slow-moving river water[/u].
this sentence makes me think that the presence of water is necessary and answerD is completly out of scope.
the answer Emakes sens as it said that in period of [u]extreme drought
the algae prefer the flow freely river!!!
Hi
The answer for this question id D

Reason: The reason is simple. Just look at the second sentencer. It says that the habitat for the algae is river water. If the rivers dry up then there is no availability of the habitat. Hence drying up of rivers decreases algae population. Hope it helps
-------------
Inner peace

### Top Member

gocoder Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
05 Dec 2015
Posted:
120 messages
Target GMAT Score:
720
Thu Sep 21, 2017 1:22 am
ceilidh.erickson wrote:
(C) When algae populations reach very high levels, conditions within the river can become toxic for some of the other species that normally live there.
Other species are irrelevant

If the choice says the following, will it right ?
" When algae populations reach very high levels, conditions within the river can become toxic for some of the species of algae that normally live there.

### Top Member

gocoder Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
05 Dec 2015
Posted:
120 messages
Target GMAT Score:
720
Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:40 am
ceilidh.erickson wrote:
(E) Except during periods of extreme drought, algae levels tend to be higher in rivers in which the flow has been controlled by damming than in rivers that flow freely.
Any answer that starts "except during extreme drought" can't possibly tell us what it is about extreme drought that makes things different. This also just supports the given premise: slow rivers = high algae. It does nothing to explain why extreme drought = low algae.

The contrast is well shown between the times of extreme drought and that of others. It suggests to me that E is wrong because this choice doesn't discuss about the Australian rivers in general; instead, it hinges on rivers are that dammed.

### Top Member

gocoder Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
05 Dec 2015
Posted:
120 messages
Target GMAT Score:
720
Sat Oct 14, 2017 4:40 am
ceilidh.erickson wrote:
(E) Except during periods of extreme drought, algae levels tend to be higher in rivers in which the flow has been controlled by damming than in rivers that flow freely.
Any answer that starts "except during extreme drought" can't possibly tell us what it is about extreme drought that makes things different. This also just supports the given premise: slow rivers = high algae. It does nothing to explain why extreme drought = low algae.

The contrast is well shown between the times of extreme drought and that of others. It suggests to me that E is wrong because this choice doesn't discuss about the Australian rivers in general; instead, it hinges on rivers are that dammed.

Is this a valid reasoning...?

### Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 61 topics
3 Roland2rule 54 topics
4 ardz24 44 topics
5 VJesus12 14 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

155 posts
2 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

105 posts
3 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

101 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

82 posts
5 Matt@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

80 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts