to the lowest level in two years vs to a two-year low level

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 30
Joined: Sat May 21, 2011 7:28 am
According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment [u]so that it was the lowest in two years[/u] suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.
[a] to what would be the lowest in two years
[b] to a two-year low level
[c] to the lowest level in two years.

Correct answer is c. On what basis do you eliminate a and b?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 188
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 10:27 pm
Thanked: 34 times
Followed by:5 members
GMAT Score:700

by prodizy » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:34 pm
A -> Would is used in two cases - When referring to future in the past and in hypothetical situations. In this question "would" is not doing that. also the sentence is lengthy

B -> I am not really sure about the grammatical nuances, but "to a two-year low", would have been correct.
My journey towards the MBA: https://theroadlesstravellled.blocked/

Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:37 am
Can someone throw some light on this one?

Thanks.