data sufficiency question

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pm
Thanked: 42 times
Followed by:20 members

data sufficiency question

by sana.noor » Sat Dec 29, 2012 10:21 am
Is x(y/z) > 0?

(1) xyz > 0
(2) yz > 0

E[/spoiler]
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:54 pm
Location: Canada
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

by Param800 » Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:08 am
What's the source of this question ?

I am not able to get the correct answer. I am getting C.

Legendary Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pm
Thanked: 42 times
Followed by:20 members

by sana.noor » Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:16 am
its from original gmat paper and i believe it should be A
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:54 pm
Location: Canada
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

by Param800 » Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:37 am
hmm... I see... ok this is how I was approaching it and because of which I believe C is the correct answer.

We have to show xy/z >0
which means either xy and z are both positive
or xy and z are both negative.

St (1) - (xy)z >0 ...which means xy and z are both positive OR xy and z are both negative.

but we can also say this ... x(yz)>0 ...which will mean either x and yz are both positive or x and yz both negative.

CORRECTION
Since there would always be two negative signs and one positive signs...when we will perform xy/z we will always get a positive number ... thus answer is should be A

because of this St(1) is insufficient.

St (2) -- yz > 0 ....doesn't tell about the sign of x...so insufficient.

Combination-

xyz >0 and yz >0 ...if we substitute second in first ..we should get... x >0

now... yz > 0 means either y >0 and Z >0
OR y<0 and z <0

Plugging in the main equation --- xy/z ... first case - y>0 , z >0 and x >0

xy/z will be >0

second case -- y<0 , z< 0 and X >0

xy/z will be >0

So.. sufficient and thus answer is C

But, doesn't match the OA :(

I will be waiting for someone to tell me the error in my method.
Last edited by Param800 on Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:51 am, edited 1 time in total.

Legendary Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pm
Thanked: 42 times
Followed by:20 members

by sana.noor » Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:00 am
How can you multiply "x(yz) >0?? the original question asks X into Y divided by Z...but i couldnt understand that why you multiply y with z?? this question seems tricky
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:54 pm
Location: Canada
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

by Param800 » Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:06 am
I agree that the question asks xy/z but the first statement says xyz > 0 which can be interpreted as follows-

(i) (xy)z>0
OR
(ii) x (yz) >0
OR
(iii) (xz)y>0

So...that's why I am multiplying x(yz)

And..yes this question is tricky...I am thinking why the OA is E..but I am not getting it...I hate when I am stuck like this.. lol

Legendary Member
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 11:31 pm
Thanked: 42 times
Followed by:20 members

by sana.noor » Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:23 am
let take x as 2 or -2
y as 8 or -8
Z as 4 or -4

i) (xy)z taking xy negative we will get (-2)(-8) and 4 = 64
ii) x(yz) taking yz negative we will again get a positive answer
iii) and if we take (xz) negative and y positive we again get positive answer....

In X (y/z) whatever two integers if taken (-ve) the answer will be greater than 0 and if we take some non-integer number still the answer will be greater than 0...
Work hard in Silence, Let Success make the noise.

If you found my Post really helpful, then don't forget to click the Thank/follow me button. :)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:54 pm
Location: Canada
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

by Param800 » Sun Dec 30, 2012 7:48 am
YES.... i think you are right...it should be A... it makes sense... but lets see if someone else comes with another answer.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Dec 30, 2012 6:08 pm
sana.noor wrote:Is x(y/z) > 0?

(1) xyz > 0
(2) yz > 0
Target question: Is x(y/z) > 0?
Notice that x(y/z) = (xy)/z = (x)(y)(1/z) [you'll see why I did this later]

Rephrased target question: Is (x)(y)(1/z) positive?

IMPORTANT CONCEPTS:
If z is positive, then 1/z is positive.
If z is negative, then 1/z is negative.
In other words, z and 1/z must have the same sign.

Statement 1: xyz > 0
In other words, the product (x)(y)(z) is positive.
Since z and 1/z have the same sign (positive or negative) we can conclude with certainty that (x)(y)(1/z) is positive
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: yz > 0
There are several sets of numbers that meet this condition. Here are two:
Case a: x=1, y=1, z=1, in which case (x)(y)(1/z) is positive
Case b: x=-1, y=1, z=1, in which case (x)(y)(1/z) is negative
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer = A

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image