Logical rebuttal CR

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

Logical rebuttal CR

by karthikpandian19 » Tue May 08, 2012 11:38 pm
An orchard in full bloom is beautiful, even if there is no one to admire it.

The statement above would be a logical rebuttal to which of the following claims?

(A) You cannot argue with taste.

(B) Beauty exists only in the eye of the beholder.

(C) Beauty is only skin deep.

(D) People will see only what they want to see.

(E) A thing of beauty is a joy forever.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:08 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:4 members

by confuse mind » Wed May 09, 2012 12:31 am
IMO - C

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 462
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 1:08 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:4 members

by confuse mind » Wed May 09, 2012 12:33 am
karthikpandian19 wrote:An orchard in full bloom is beautiful, even if there is no one to admire it.

The statement above would be a logical rebuttal to which of the following claims?

(A) You cannot argue with taste.

(B) Beauty exists only in the eye of the beholder.

(C) Beauty is only skin deep.

(D) People will see only what they want to see.

(E) A thing of beauty is a joy forever.


Can you please help me with some source where I can find the theory and practice problems for the category 'Logical rebuttal' since I am seeing this for the first time and PowerScore book completely misses this one.

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:25 am

by Varun Venugopal » Wed May 09, 2012 4:12 am
B for me

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:57 pm
Location: Everywhere
Thanked: 503 times
Followed by:192 members
GMAT Score:780

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Wed May 09, 2012 8:37 am
This is an LSAT-like question, and I've never seen a GMAT question like it.

Stimulus: An orchard is beautiful regardless of anyone seeing it.

A--Nothing about taste/opinion in the original statement

B--Yes. For something to be beautiful, it must be seen. If an orchard is beautiful without being seen, then this statement cannot be true.

C--Nothing about superficial levels/depth in the original statement.

D--Nothing about selective seeing in the original statement.

E--Nothing about joy or timeframe (forever) in the original statement.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1665
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 7:04 pm
Thanked: 165 times
Followed by:70 members

by karthikpandian19 » Wed May 09, 2012 10:43 pm
OA is B....


I got some of these questions from Grockit GMAT.
confuse mind wrote:
karthikpandian19 wrote:An orchard in full bloom is beautiful, even if there is no one to admire it.

The statement above would be a logical rebuttal to which of the following claims?

(A) You cannot argue with taste.

(B) Beauty exists only in the eye of the beholder.

(C) Beauty is only skin deep.

(D) People will see only what they want to see.

(E) A thing of beauty is a joy forever.


Can you please help me with some source where I can find the theory and practice problems for the category 'Logical rebuttal' since I am seeing this for the first time and PowerScore book completely misses this one.