Types of Reasoning in CR

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 9:01 am
Followed by:1 members

Types of Reasoning in CR

by qwerty12321 » Wed Jun 25, 2014 4:13 am
What are the various types of reasoning in CR a per Powerscore CR Bible.....
for eg analogy, circular, conditional, causal......

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Wed Jun 25, 2014 9:15 am
Hi qwerty1321,

Have you purchased this book? If you'd like to know what's in it, then buying a copy would seem like the most direct way to answer this question.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Fri Jun 27, 2014 1:20 am
While it's helpful to recognize certain patterns of arguments (causation/correlation, generalization, etc.), I think it's MUCH more helpful to recognize the different CR question types and anticipate what they require of you strategy-wise.

I tend to subdivide CR into:

- Weaken
- Strengthen (ex: https://gmatrockstar.com/2014/01/26/gmat ... the-day-4/)
- Assumption
- Conclusion
- Bold Face
- Inference
- Must Be True
- Cause and Effect
- Paradox/Resolve (ex: https://gmatrockstar.com/2014/01/25/gmat ... uestion-2/)
- Numbers/Percents
- Flaw
- Additional Evidence
- Similar Reasoning
- Complete the Passage
- Method of Reasoning
- Evaluate the Argument

For example, a "Generalization" argument could appear in many of these Q-types! So I'd subdivide based on this or a similar model, break down the argument accordingly, and write down a prediction before reading the answer choices.

Good luck!
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 9:01 am
Followed by:1 members

by qwerty12321 » Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:14 am
Hi [email protected]

Yes, I have purchased this book. It is very informative.
:)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 63
Joined: Sat May 17, 2014 9:01 am
Followed by:1 members

by qwerty12321 » Tue Jul 08, 2014 10:16 am
Hi VivianKerr
Thank you for your reply.

I wanted to know about these reasoning types so that i can better understand how to solve parallel reasoning questions.

Thanks
:)

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Tue Jul 08, 2014 11:27 am
Hi qwerty12321,

Parallel Reasoning questions are relatively rare on the GMAT (you might see 1). They're most similar to Inference questions. You can answer this question by understanding the reasoning/logic/format that is presented in the prompt, then finding an answer that follows that same reasoning/logic/format.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:33 pm
Here's how you can analyze a similar reading question and get this question type correct!

"¢ Count the Evidence. How many components are there to the premise? The correct answer will always have the same number of pieces of evidence as the original argument.

"¢ Look for Keywords. Words like "might," "could," "must," etc. in the argument set up a relationship between the evidence and conclusion that should be mirrored in the correct answer.

"¢ Identify the Conclusion. What type of conclusion is in the argument? Is the author recommending something, making a prediction, giving a counterargument, etc.? Just as with the evidence, the correct conclusion will mimic the logic of the argument in the paragraph.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)