Gmat Prep Geometry

This topic has expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:53 am
Location: New York City
Thanked: 1 times

by GMATDavid » Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:02 am
The triangle is a special right triangle (30-60-90). The ratios of the sides are x, x-root3 and 2x, respectively. Because the y value is 1, the little angle adjacent to the right angle is 30-degrees. That means the angle on the other side of the right angle is 60 degrees, forming another 30-60-90 triangle. The question asks for the side opposite the 30-degree angle of that triangle, so the answer is 1. The diagram is not to scale -- you just have to apply the rules and ignore how it looks.

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:53 am
Location: New York City
Thanked: 1 times

by GMATDavid » Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:04 am
The triangle is a special right triangle (30-60-90). The ratios of the sides are x, x-root3 and 2x, respectively. Because the y value is 1, the little angle adjacent to the right angle is 30-degrees. That means the angle on the other side of the right angle is 60 degrees, forming another 30-60-90 triangle. The question asks for the side opposite the 30-degree angle of that triangle, so the answer is 1. The diagram is not to scale -- you just have to apply the rules and ignore how it looks.

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:53 am
Location: New York City
Thanked: 1 times

by GMATDavid » Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:05 am
The triangle is a special right triangle (30-60-90). The ratios of the sides are x, x-root3 and 2x, respectively. Because the y value is 1, the little angle adjacent to the right angle is 30-degrees. That means the angle on the other side of the right angle is 60 degrees, forming another 30-60-90 triangle. The question asks for the side opposite the 30-degree angle of that triangle, so the answer is 1. The diagram is not to scale -- you just have to apply the rules and ignore how it looks.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:14 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:760

by rs2010 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:35 am
Since one point is given so you can calculate radius of the circle which will
2. After this calculate the length of arc between these points which will be equal to 2*pi*r/4 ( since angle is 90 degrees).

This will give you values of s and t.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:59 am

by steinbock » Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:59 am
Thanks to both of you for your explanations. Still trying to understand though....

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 232
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 4:14 pm
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:760

by rs2010 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:07 am
Since O is center so distance would be equal to radius from any point on the circle.
Second is length of arc e.g.

If you have 360 degree angle then its called the circuference with 2*pi*r and if you have any angle then you will do angle/360degrees.


Let me know if this helps.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Florida
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:710

by lion147 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:19 am
steinbock wrote:Thanks to both of you for your explanations. Still trying to understand though....
Try drawing it to scale on paper.

Point P forms a 30-60-90 triangle with the X axis, the base is sroot(3), and the height is 1. We know the ratios of the sides (1:sroot(3):2) so the longest side, which is also the circle's radius, is 2x1 = 2. Also the angle formed by the line to P and the X axis is 30 degrees.

Now, you can calculate the size of the angle formed by the line to point Q and the X axis, it's 180-90-30 = 60 degrees.

So there's another 30-60-90 triangle, the base is 's', the height is 't' and the longest side is 2. Again we know the ratios, and we have the angles so:

s = 2/2 = 1
t = (2/2) x sroot(3) = sroot(3).

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 6:45 am

by onesome » Sun Jul 06, 2008 3:18 pm
Can you please explain how you are identifying that this triangle is a special triangle = 30-60-90 triangle?
I can see 90 but Im not sure how you conclude 30-60 for other 2.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:15 pm
Here's another thread on this question:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/please-help- ... t7941.html
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:14 am
Location: Florida
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:710

by lion147 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 6:20 pm
onesome wrote:Can you please explain how you are identifying that this triangle is a special triangle = 30-60-90 triangle?
I can see 90 but Im not sure how you conclude 30-60 for other 2.
The first triangle on the left has the X axis as it's base with a length of sroot(3), the height is 1 and there's a right angle in between; this must be a 30-60-90 triangle.

The same triangle is on the right, but rotated; the radius (2) is the longest side, we also have two angles - 30 and 90, so this also must be a 30-60-90 triangle.

Also, you don't need to use the 30-60-90 rule, you can use pythag once you know one angle is 90 degrees, but it would be better to know the shortcut as a time saver.

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 26
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 8:53 am
Location: New York City
Thanked: 1 times

by GMATDavid » Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:45 am
Yes, the 30-60-90 rule is very convenient to know as the GMAT test writers like to use it.

All 30-60-90 triangles have sides with the same ratios. x, x-root3 and 2x. So you could have 1, root3, 2 as here, or 3, 3-root3, 6 in a bigger triangle.

Every diagonal line in the coordinate plane is the hyptenuse of a right triangle. Here, using the x and y values (the two sides) you can recognize the 30-60-90 ratio.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:25 am
I could suggest a different approach here. Notice that OP and OQ are perpendicular lines, and are the same length. We can use the simple fact that they are perpendicular to get the answer directly here, with no calculations.

To review the theory (and I'll use concrete numbers to make things easier): if 2/3 is the slope of a line L, we know that -3/2 is the slope of a perpendicular line M. Now, what does the slope '2/3' mean? It means you need to go right 3 units in order that L will rise by 2 units. That's the definition of the slope. On the perpendicular line M, with slope -3/2, you would need to go right 2 units in order for the line to 'rise' -3 units (i.e. fall by 3 units). The vertical and horizontal changes get 'reversed' on the perpendicular line, and one of the changes becomes negative. Thus, if (0,0) is a point on both L and M, then we know that (3, 2) will be a point on L, and (2, -3) will be a point on the perpendicular line M. Notice that each of these points is the same distance from (0,0).

The relationship between perpendicular lines becomes much clearer if you draw a few examples on the co-ordinate plane. Anyway, if you understand this relationship well, the question can be solved almost immediately:

On OP, if we go right by sqrt(3) units, the line falls by 1 unit. On the perpendicular line OQ, if we go right by 1 unit, the line must rise by sqrt(3) units, since OQ is perpendicular to OP. Thus, point Q must be (1, sqrt(3)).
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com

ianstewartgmat.com

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
Location: Montreal
Thanked: 1090 times
Followed by:355 members
GMAT Score:780

by Ian Stewart » Mon Jul 07, 2008 9:30 am
Aha, I just followed the link Stuart posted above, and a while ago he suggested the same solution as I just did, with a very clear explanation as well- nice one!