tricky speed question

This topic has expert replies

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

tricky speed question

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Mon Apr 10, 2017 7:30 am
Ann and Bea leave X-ville at the same time and travel towards Y-ville, which is 70 kilometers away. Their individual speeds are constant, but Ann's speed is greater than Bea's speed. Upon reaching Y-ville, Ann immediately turns around and drives toward X-ville until she meets Bea. When they meet, how far has Bea traveled?

1) Ann's speed is 30 kilometers per hour greater than Bea's speed
2) Ann's speed is twice Bea's speed

Answer: B

Source: www.gmatprepnow.com
Difficulty level: 650 - 700
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Apr 11, 2017 7:15 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Ann and Bea leave X-ville at the same time and travel towards Y-ville, which is 70 kilometers away. Their individual speeds are constant, but Ann's speed is greater than Bea's speed. Upon reaching Y-ville, Ann immediately turns around and drives toward X-ville until she meets Bea. When they meet, how far has Bea traveled?

1) Ann's speed is 30 kilometers per hour greater than Bea's speed
2) Ann's speed is twice Bea's speed
Target question: When they meet, how far has Bea traveled?

Statement 1: Ann's speed is 30 kilometers per hour greater than Bea's speed
We can see that is not sufficient if we examine some EXTREME CASES:
Case a: Ann's speed = 30.00000001 kilometers per hour, and Bea's speed = 0.00000001 kilometers per hour. In this case, Bea travels almost 0 kilometers
Case b: Ann's speed = 40 kilometers per hour, and Bea's speed = 10 kilometers per hour. In this case, Bea travels more than 0 kilometers
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: Ann's speed is twice Bea's speed
One option here is to test a bunch of cases to see what happens. If we do this, we'll find that we keep getting the same answer to the target question

Alternatively, we can use some algebra:
Let B = the distance Bea traveled
Let R = Bea's speed.


NOTE: the total distance from Townville to Villageton and then BACK TO Townville = 140 kilometers.

So, 140 - B = the distance Ann traveled
And 2R = Ann's speed (since her speed is TWICE Bea's speed)


From here, let's create a WORD EQUATION that uses distance and speed.
How about: Ann's travel time = Bea's travel time

Time = distance/rate, so we get:
(140 - B)/2R = B/R
Cross multiply to get: (B)(2R) = (R)(140 - B)
Expand: 2BR = 140R - BR
Add BR to both sides: 3BR = 140R
Divide both sides by R to get: 3B = 140
Divide both sides by 3 to get: B = 140/3
In other words, Bea traveled 140/3 kilometers
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT

Answer: B

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Apr 11, 2017 9:52 am
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Ann and Bea leave X-ville at the same time and travel towards Y-ville, which is 70 kilometers away. Their individual speeds are constant, but Ann's speed is greater than Bea's speed. Upon reaching Y-ville, Ann immediately turns around and drives toward X-ville until she meets Bea. When they meet, how far has Bea traveled?

1) Ann's speed is 30 kilometers per hour greater than Bea's speed
2) Ann's speed is twice Bea's speed
Alternate approach for Statement 2:
Bea travels half as fast as Ann.
Thus, when Ann has traveled the WHOLE distance to Y-ville, Bea will be only HALFWAY to Y-ville.
As a result, half the total distance -- 35 miles -- will then separate Bea and Ann.
For Bea and Ann to meet, they must now WORK TOGETHER to cover the 35 remaining miles between them.
Since Bea travels 1km for every 2km that Ann travels, Bea will travel 1 of every 3 miles that are traveled when she and Ann work together.
Implication:
Bea will travel 1/3 of the 35 remaining miles between her and Ann.
Thus:
Total distance traveled by Bea = (half the total distance) + (1/3)(35 remaining miles between Bea and Ann) = 35 + (1/3)(35) = 140/3 miles.
SUFFICIENT.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members

by Mo2men » Sat Apr 15, 2017 3:43 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Alternate approach for Statement 2:
Bea travels half as fast as Ann.
Thus, when Ann has traveled the WHOLE distance to Y-ville, Bea will be only HALFWAY to Y-ville.
As a result, half the total distance -- 35 miles -- will then separate Bea and Ann.
For Bea and Ann to meet, they must now WORK TOGETHER to cover the 35 remaining miles between them.
Since Bea travels 1km for every 2km that Ann travels, Bea will travel 1 of every 3 miles that are traveled when she and Ann work together.
Implication:
Bea will travel 1/3 of the 35 remaining miles between her and Ann.

Thus:
Total distance traveled by Bea = (half the total distance) + (1/3)(35 remaining miles between Bea and Ann) = 35 + (1/3)(35) = 140/3 miles.
SUFFICIENT.
Dear GMATGuru,

How you do you interpret the same data in Red in case that two cars are chasing each other?

Can you please show with an example or direct to solved example in case of chasing?

Thanks

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:29 am
Mo2men wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Alternate approach for Statement 2:
Bea travels half as fast as Ann.
Thus, when Ann has traveled the WHOLE distance to Y-ville, Bea will be only HALFWAY to Y-ville.
As a result, half the total distance -- 35 miles -- will then separate Bea and Ann.
For Bea and Ann to meet, they must now WORK TOGETHER to cover the 35 remaining miles between them.
Since Bea travels 1km for every 2km that Ann travels, Bea will travel 1 of every 3 miles that are traveled when she and Ann work together.
Implication:
Bea will travel 1/3 of the 35 remaining miles between her and Ann.

Thus:
Total distance traveled by Bea = (half the total distance) + (1/3)(35 remaining miles between Bea and Ann) = 35 + (1/3)(35) = 140/3 miles.
SUFFICIENT.
Dear GMATGuru,

How you do you interpret the same data in Red in case that two cars are chasing each other?

Can you please show with an example or direct to solved example in case of chasing?

Thanks
After Bea arrives at the halfway point and Ann arrives at Y-ville, Ann TURNS AROUND and travels back TOWARD BEA, while Bea continues her journey and travels TOWARD ANN.
Since Bea and Ann are traveling TOWARD EACH OTHER, they are NOT chasing each other.
Rather, they are WORKING TOGETHER to cover the 35 miles between them.
Thus, the reasoning in the red portion applies.

If Ann is chasing Bea, and we want to determine the distance that Ann and Bea will each travel before Ann catches up to Bea, we could apply the following line of reasoning:
Let d = the distance between Ann and Bea.
Distance traveled by Ann = (Ann's rate)/(Difference between Ann's rate and Bea's rate) * d.
Distance traveled by Bea = (Bea's rate)/(Difference between Ann's rate and Bea's rate) * d.

Case 1: d=100, Ann's rate is twice Bea's rate
Since Ann is 100 miles BEHIND Bea, she must travel 100 more miles than Bea to CATCH UP to Bea.

Let Ann's rate = 2mph and Bea's rate = 1mph
Distance traveled by Ann = 2/(2-1) * 100 = 200 miles.
Distance traveled by Bea = 1/(2-1) * 100 = 100 miles.

Let Ann's rate = 4mph and Bea's rate = 2mph
Distance traveled by Ann = 4/(4-2) * 100 = 200 miles.
Distance traveled by Bea = 2/(4-2) * 100 = 100 miles.

Let Ann's rate = 20mph and Bea's rate = 10mph
Distance traveled by Ann = 20/(20-10) * 100 = 200 miles.
Distance traveled by Bea = 10/(20-10) * 100 = 100 miles.

In every case, Ann travels 100 more miles than Bea, with the result that she catches up to Bea.
Thus, as the three cases above illustrate, the distance traveled by Ann = 200 miles, while the distance traveled by Bea = 100 miles.

Case 2: d=100, Ann's rate is three times Bea's rate
Since Ann is 100 miles BEHIND Bea, she must travel 100 more miles than Bea to CATCH UP to Bea.

Let Ann's rate = 3mph and Bea's rate = 1mph
Distance traveled by Ann = 3/(3-1) * 100 = 150 miles.
Distance traveled by Bea = 1/(3-1) * 100 = 50 miles.

Let Ann's rate = 6mph and Bea's rate = 2mph
Distance traveled by Ann = 6/(6-2) * 100 = 150 miles.
Distance traveled by Bea = 2/(6-2) * 100 = 50 miles.

Let Ann's rate = 30mph and Bea's rate = 10mph
Distance traveled by Ann = 30/(30-10) * 100 = 150 miles.
Distance traveled by Bea = 10/(30-10) * 100 = 50 miles.

In every case, Ann travels 100 more miles than Bea, with the result that she catches up to Bea.
Thus, as the three cases above illustrate, the distance traveled by Ann = 150 miles, while the distance traveled by Bea = 50 miles.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Sat Apr 15, 2017 6:59 am, edited 2 times in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members

by Mo2men » Sat Apr 15, 2017 6:39 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Mo2men wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Alternate approach for Statement 2:
Bea travels half as fast as Ann.
Thus, when Ann has traveled the WHOLE distance to Y-ville, Bea will be only HALFWAY to Y-ville.
As a result, half the total distance -- 35 miles -- will then separate Bea and Ann.
For Bea and Ann to meet, they must now WORK TOGETHER to cover the 35 remaining miles between them.
Since Bea travels 1km for every 2km that Ann travels, Bea will travel 1 of every 3 miles that are traveled when she and Ann work together.
Implication:
Bea will travel 1/3 of the 35 remaining miles between her and Ann.

Thus:
Total distance traveled by Bea = (half the total distance) + (1/3)(35 remaining miles between Bea and Ann) = 35 + (1/3)(35) = 140/3 miles.
SUFFICIENT.
Dear GMATGuru,

How you do you interpret the same data in Red in case that two cars are chasing each other?

Can you please show with an example or direct to solved example in case of chasing?

Thanks
After Bea arrives at the halfway point and Ann arrives at Y-ville, Ann TURNS AROUND and travels back TOWARD BEA, while Bea continues her journey and travels TOWARD ANN.
Since Bea and Ann are traveling TOWARD EACH OTHER, they are NOT chasing each other.
Rather, they are WORKING TOGETHER to cover the 35 miles between them.
Thus, the reasoning in the red portion applies.

If Ann were chasing Bea, I would not apply this line of reasoning.
Dear Mitch,

Thanks for your help.However, you missed my point as I was not clear enough. My question above was a general question not related to the original problem. I want to see how to apply the same reasoning in CHASING situation.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Apr 15, 2017 6:48 am
Mo2men wrote:Thanks for your help.However, you missed my point as I was not clear enough. My question above was a general question not related to the original problem. I want to see how to apply the same reasoning in CHASING situation.
I've amended my second post above to answer your question.
Please check the revised post.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3