Tough probability

New MBA Student Life Forum: Ask your questions to current MBA students from Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Kellogg and Haas

Post new topic   Reply to topic

punitkaur
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 118

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts

Topic: Tough probability
PostThu Nov 05, 2009 3:14 pm Reply with quote

There are three secretaries who work for four departments. If each of the four departments has one report to be typed out, and the reports are randomly assigned to a secretary, what is the probability that all three secretaries are assigned at least one report?

Ans is 8/9

I have a basic doubt here. When calculating total outcomes or ways in which 4 reports can be assigned to 3 secretaries... how to decide whether it should be 3^4 or
4 x 3 x 2

for latter method - 1st secretary can be assigned a report in 4 ways, second can be assigned 3 ways and 3rd in 2 ways.

I know I am going wrong somewhere and need someone to clarify this doubt of mine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
grockit_jake
GMAT Instructor



Joined: 12 Aug 2009
Posts: 78

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 11 times in 10 posts
Location: San Francisco, CA

PostFri Nov 06, 2009 12:00 pm Reply with quote

Since each report is assigned randomly, you can look at each report as its own probability:

Since there are 3 options of where each report can do and 4 total reports, your total number of options is 3*3*3*3 = 3^4.

I would look at the term "at least 1" as "NOT Zero" or "1 - ZERO"

The probability of secretary A not receiving an individual report is 2/3. So the chances of NOT receiving any of the 4 reports (since they are assigned independantly) is (2/3)^4.

_________________
Jake Becker
Grockit Tutor
http://www.grockit.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
life is a test
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 136

Thanks given: 4
Thanked 8 times in 8 posts

PostFri Nov 06, 2009 10:37 pm Reply with quote

grockit_jake wrote:
Since each report is assigned randomly, you can look at each report as its own probability:

Since there are 3 options of where each report can do and 4 total reports, your total number of options is 3*3*3*3 = 3^4.

I would look at the term "at least 1" as "NOT Zero" or "1 - ZERO"

The probability of secretary A not receiving an individual report is 2/3. So the chances of NOT receiving any of the 4 reports (since they are assigned independantly) is (2/3)^4.
I am not clear on how this would lead to 8/9 as the ans... can you please explain?

also am not clear on where am going wrong with the approach of using 1- probability of any one of the secretaries getting no reports:

p(no reports)= (2/3)^4
P(Sec 1 gets no reports) or P(Sec 2 gets no reports)or P(Sec 1 gets no reports) = 3* ((2/3)^4)= 16/27

p(at least one report) = 1-16/27 = 11/27.
Where am I going wrong?

really appreciate your help.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
palvarez
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Posts: 181

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 14 times in 14 posts

GMAT Score: 710

PostFri Nov 06, 2009 11:48 pm Reply with quote

Let X, Y, Z be 3 secretaries.

X + Y + Z = 4

How many integer solutions does this equation have?

6c2 = 15

The question is asking to find the number of solutions such that X, Y, Z >= 1.

In this case, find all int solutions for X + Y + Z = 1 (after taking 1 out of each secy).

solutions = 3c2 = 3.

Answer is: 3/15 = 1/5
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
palvarez
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Posts: 181

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 14 times in 14 posts

GMAT Score: 710

PostSat Nov 07, 2009 12:01 am Reply with quote

I think 3^4 doesn't cut it.

3^4 does work when repetition and order are important like in picking up a code on a combination lock or picking a number in n-ary number system.

In this scenario, there is no repetition (once ya assign a letter to a particular secretary, you aint gonna assign the same to another secretary).

Order matters, because assigning dept1's letter to secy A is not same as dept1's letter to secy B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
viju9162
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 249

Thanks given: 8
Thanked 4 times in 4 posts

Target GMAT Score: 750

PostMon Nov 09, 2009 5:20 am Reply with quote

Hi palvarez,

Thanks for the explaination. I am unable to understand it.

How can we derive the answer with this formular:

P(reports) = 1 - P (no reports)..

Your help is much appreciated...

Regards,
Viju

_________________
I love to win, hate to lose
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Kevdog2834
Just gettin' started!



Joined: 10 Jun 2009
Posts: 1

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

Test Date: n/a
Target GMAT Score: 650

PostMon Nov 09, 2009 11:51 am Reply with quote

viju9162 wrote:
Hi palvarez,

How can we derive the answer with this formular:

P(reports) = 1 - P (no reports)..

Your help is much appreciated...

Regards,
Viju
If we are looking for a minimum of 1 report going to each secretary than the total of what you want to happen + what you dont want to happen = 1.

With this equation finding the probability of no reports is critical because then when you subtract it from 1 you are left with AT LEAST 1 report or more being assigned which is what it is looking for.

There are always more than one way to answer these questions but this is going to be your quickest way.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
life is a test
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 02 Mar 2009
Posts: 136

Thanks given: 4
Thanked 8 times in 8 posts

PostMon Nov 09, 2009 5:38 pm Reply with quote

would be helpful to have an instructor (or anyone else) give a detailed explanation with the final answer - still seems to be a lot of confusion over this question.

Thank you!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1