Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

Tough Overlapping sets

This topic has 6 expert replies and 5 member replies
abhi75 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
16 Oct 2007
Posted:
105 messages
Thanked:
3 times
Tough Overlapping sets Post Sat May 03, 2008 11:32 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Favorable Unfavorable Not sure
    Candidate M 40 20 40
    Candidate N 30 35 35

    The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters each responded "favorable" or "unfavorable" or "not sure" when asked about their impressions of candidate M and of candidate N. What was the number of voters who responded "favorable" for both candidates?

    (1) The number of voters who did not respond "favorable" for either candidate was
    40.
    (2) The number of voters who responded "unfavorable" for both candidates was 10.
    A. Statement (1) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (2) alone is not sufficient.
    B. Statement (2) ALONE is sufficient, but statement (1) alone is not sufficient.
    C. BOTH statements TOGETHER are sufficient, but NEITHER statement ALONE is
    sufficient.
    D. EACH statement ALONE is sufficient.
    E. Statements (1) and (2) TOGETHER are NOT sufficient.

    Can someone please explain how to solve this kind of problems. If the table is not clear please refer to the attached document.

    Thanks in advance.
    Attachments

    This post contains an attachment. You must be logged in to download/view this file. Please login or register as a user.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Thu May 08, 2008 1:42 am
    explanation on the image (link attached)

    the orange and blue are no accident. go gators!

    click here to see the solution

    [editor: this link is broken - for an updated link, see below.]

    _________________
    Ron is a Director of Curriculum Development at Manhattan GMAT. He has been teaching various standardized tests for almost 20 years.

    He wears white after Labor Day, gets 55% of his calories from protein, and takes standardized tests for fun.

    Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron o en inglés o en español.

    If you send Ron a private message, please allow 1-2 weeks for a response.

    Learn more about ron



    Last edited by lunarpower on Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:37 am; edited 1 time in total

    Free Manhattan GMAT online events - The first class of every online Manhattan GMAT course is free. Classes start every week.
    abhi75 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
    Joined
    16 Oct 2007
    Posted:
    105 messages
    Thanked:
    3 times
    Post Fri Jun 13, 2008 7:43 am
    Hey Ron,

    Thanks a lot for the solution. I really appreciate it.

    -A

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Fri Jun 13, 2008 11:42 am
    no problem - i'm glad you found it useful. that is a cool problem.

    _________________
    Ron is a Director of Curriculum Development at Manhattan GMAT. He has been teaching various standardized tests for almost 20 years.

    He wears white after Labor Day, gets 55% of his calories from protein, and takes standardized tests for fun.

    Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron o en inglés o en español.

    If you send Ron a private message, please allow 1-2 weeks for a response.

    Learn more about ron

    Free Manhattan GMAT online events - The first class of every online Manhattan GMAT course is free. Classes start every week.

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Sun Jun 15, 2008 5:59 pm
    lunarpower wrote:
    no problem - i'm glad you found it useful. that is a cool problem.
    haha, i just realized i posted the wrong answer on the solution sheet.

    the reasoning is all correct, but the answer is supposed to be 'a'

    just testing you guys.
    really.

    _________________
    Ron is a Director of Curriculum Development at Manhattan GMAT. He has been teaching various standardized tests for almost 20 years.

    He wears white after Labor Day, gets 55% of his calories from protein, and takes standardized tests for fun.

    Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron o en inglés o en español.

    If you send Ron a private message, please allow 1-2 weeks for a response.

    Learn more about ron

    Free Manhattan GMAT online events - The first class of every online Manhattan GMAT course is free. Classes start every week.

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Mon Nov 16, 2009 3:35 am
    here's an updated link

    http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=gx1ffBD9

    the answer still mistakenly says 'B' on the bottom of the page. (it's supposed to be (a))

    _________________
    Ron is a Director of Curriculum Development at Manhattan GMAT. He has been teaching various standardized tests for almost 20 years.

    He wears white after Labor Day, gets 55% of his calories from protein, and takes standardized tests for fun.

    Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron o en inglés o en español.

    If you send Ron a private message, please allow 1-2 weeks for a response.

    Learn more about ron

    Thanked by: gmattesttaker2
    Free Manhattan GMAT online events - The first class of every online Manhattan GMAT course is free. Classes start every week.
    OneTwoThreeFour Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    01 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    85 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Sat Jan 01, 2011 1:58 pm
    Great solution! But wouldn't it be helpful just to create a triple matrix in the beginning? I don't think two minutes is enough time to make two separate tables. Thanks a lot I was having a lot of trouble with this one!

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Sat Jan 01, 2011 2:48 pm
    OneTwoThreeFour wrote:
    Great solution! But wouldn't it be helpful just to create a triple matrix in the beginning? I don't think two minutes is enough time to make two separate tables. Thanks a lot I was having a lot of trouble with this one!
    well -- no matter what approach you take, you should always make separate matrices for statements (1) and (2) -- even if the row and column headings are the same (which they usually will be).
    the reason is simple: statement (1) contains information that's not in statement (2), and statement (2) also contains information that's not in statement (1). if you try to do all of this in one matrix, the potential for confusion is way too high, especially because you have to write on plastic with a marker (no pencils or erasers!).

    if you want to make the full-on Favorable/Unfavorable/Not Sure matrix for statement (1), you can do so.
    if you do this, instead of a simple "40" in the "not favorable" row (which encompasses both "unfavorable" and "not sure"), you'll have an "x" and a "40 - x", respectively, in separate rows for "unfavorable" and "not sure" (or vice versa). overall, the problem will still work out the same way, though -- if you do the algebra through the rest of the table, you'll notice that all of the x's cancel out of the square that you want.
    still, though, it's good to be able to recognize that you don't have to consider any distinctions other than "favorable"/"not favorable" in that problem, though -- this sort of recognition is the linchpin of several other problems with multiple distinctions between items, too. for example, see problem #107 in the OG12 data sufficiency section.

    _________________
    Ron is a Director of Curriculum Development at Manhattan GMAT. He has been teaching various standardized tests for almost 20 years.

    He wears white after Labor Day, gets 55% of his calories from protein, and takes standardized tests for fun.

    Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron o en inglés o en español.

    If you send Ron a private message, please allow 1-2 weeks for a response.

    Learn more about ron

    Free Manhattan GMAT online events - The first class of every online Manhattan GMAT course is free. Classes start every week.
    OneTwoThreeFour Rising GMAT Star Default Avatar
    Joined
    01 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    85 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Sat Jan 08, 2011 12:01 pm
    I understand. I was thinking by creating one triple matrix in the beginning, and if only part A is sufficient, then you can just black out your numbers and eliminate B, C, E and move on to statement 2. You can then fill out the table with the remaining spaces left in the table when analyzing statement 2. However if statement 1 one is insufficient, statement 2 is insufficient, and only the combined statements of 1 & 2 are sufficient, then the table would get a lot messier with all the blacked out numbers. So in the end, I guess your strategy is the more efficient one. Anyways, thank you so much for replying back to me and I sincerely appreciated your input.

    GMAT/MBA Expert

    Post Sat Jan 08, 2011 4:38 pm
    abhi75 wrote:
    Favorable Unfavorable Not sure
    Candidate M 40 20 40
    Candidate N 30 35 35

    The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters each responded favorable or unfavorable or not sure when asked about their impressions of candidate M and of candidate N. What was the number of voters who responded favorable for both candidates?

    (1) The number of voters who did not respond favorable for either candidate was
    40.
    (2) The number of voters who responded unfavorable for both candidates was 10.


    Thanks in advance.
    I wouldn't do much math for this problem. We're looking for the number who voted favorable for both M and N. In other words, the overlap between the 2 favorable groups.

    The big idea with overlapping group problems is to subtract the overlap. When we count the number who voted favorable for M and the number who voted favorable for N, the number who voted favorable for both -- the overlap -- gets counted twice. So that we don't double-count the overlap, it must be subtracted from the total:

    Total favorable = Favorable for M + Favorable for N - Favorable for Both


    Since we know that 40 voted favorable for M and that 30 voted favorable for N, to solve for the number who voted favorable for both -- the overlap -- we need to know the total number of favorable votes.

    Statement 1:
    If 40 did not respond favorable for either candidate, then the total who did respond favorable was 100-40 = 60.
    60 = 40 + 30 - both.
    Both = 10.
    Sufficient.

    Statement 2:
    Tells us the overlap between the 2 unfavorable groups. Doesn't help us to determine the overlap between the 2 favorable groups.
    Insufficient.

    The correct answer is A.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor and Instructor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Contact me about long distance tutoring!

    Thanked by: vikram.sumer, crisro
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    helloanupam Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    25 Nov 2009
    Posted:
    4 messages
    Post Thu Nov 10, 2011 9:47 am
    Dear Ron,
    Turtle speed if you want to call that...but my lack of understanding is the below point in your sheet-

    Statement 2 actually does distinguish between the two not favorable cases....HOW? How is this apparent. Please help clarify.

    vikram.sumer Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    15 May 2011
    Posted:
    9 messages
    Post Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:19 am
    This is a classic kick as* approach. Simple solution to a problem which seems very tough.

    Kudos !!

    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    abhi75 wrote:
    Favorable Unfavorable Not sure
    Candidate M 40 20 40
    Candidate N 30 35 35

    The table above shows the results of a survey of 100 voters each responded favorable or unfavorable or not sure when asked about their impressions of candidate M and of candidate N. What was the number of voters who responded favorable for both candidates?

    (1) The number of voters who did not respond favorable for either candidate was
    40.
    (2) The number of voters who responded unfavorable for both candidates was 10.


    Thanks in advance.
    I wouldn't do much math for this problem. We're looking for the number who voted favorable for both M and N. In other words, the overlap between the 2 favorable groups.

    The big idea with overlapping group problems is to subtract the overlap. When we count the number who voted favorable for M and the number who voted favorable for N, the number who voted favorable for both -- the overlap -- gets counted twice. So that we don't double-count the overlap, it must be subtracted from the total:

    Total favorable = Favorable for M + Favorable for N - Favorable for Both


    Since we know that 40 voted favorable for M and that 30 voted favorable for N, to solve for the number who voted favorable for both -- the overlap -- we need to know the total number of favorable votes.

    Statement 1:
    If 40 did not respond favorable for either candidate, then the total who did respond favorable was 100-40 = 60.
    60 = 40 + 30 - both.
    Both = 10.
    Sufficient.

    Statement 2:
    Tells us the overlap between the 2 unfavorable groups. Doesn't help us to determine the overlap between the 2 favorable groups.
    Insufficient.

    The correct answer is A.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 varun289 43 topics
    2 greenwich 30 topics
    3 sana.noor 22 topics
    4 guerrero 20 topics
    5 killerdrummer 18 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    205 posts
    2 image description Anju@Gurome

    Gurome

    146 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    145 posts
    4 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    96 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    39 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts