Tough One

New MBA Student Life Forum: Ask your questions to current MBA students from Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Kellogg and Haas

Post new topic   Reply to topic

2010gmat
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 06 Mar 2009
Posts: 291

Thanks given: 7
Thanked 6 times in 5 posts

Target GMAT Score: 750

Topic: Tough One
PostFri Nov 06, 2009 7:08 am Reply with quote

7. During the 1980s it became clear that soliciting private funds was far more efficient for environmentalists who sought financial aid than to go to state or federal agencies.
(A) that soliciting private funds was far more efficient for environmentalists who sought financial aid
(B) that for environmentalists who sought financial aid, it was far more efficient to solicit private funds
(C) that for environmentalists seeking financial aid, private organizations were far more efficient to go to
(D) for environmentalists seeking financial aid, going to private organizations was far more efficient
(E) for environmentalists who sought financial aid, private organizations were far more efficient


I know this one is posted on the forum but there is no proper reasoning....

Can the experts pls help...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hitmewithgmat
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 189

Thanks given: 4
Thanked 8 times in 8 posts

Target GMAT Score: 750

PostFri Nov 06, 2009 7:55 am Reply with quote

This question tests us whether you know:
1.idiom- X more than Y (X and Y are parallel)
2.Parallelism
3.We need 'that" after 'clear' So D and E are out.
Between A,B and C
(A)'Soliciting private funds' is not parallel to 'to go to state '. So the comparison itself is faulty.
(B) Correct- 'to solicit private funds' is parallel to 'to go to' and therefore the comparison is grammatically correct. Also the expression 'more' is as close to 'than' as possible. Placement of the phrase 'to solicit private funds' between 'more' and 'than' is required for proper and clear comparison is therefore necessary in this sentence.
(C)'private organizations were far more efficient to go to than to go to' is awkward expression and illogical.

Hope it helps.

_________________
Disclaimer-I am not a GMAT savvy yet, but I am learning everyday with my fellow beatthegmat citizens.

I AM DETERMINED TO CRASH/NIX OUT/ATTACK BRUTALLY/CRACK VERBAL PART OF GMAT. ROAR!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
2010gmat
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 06 Mar 2009
Posts: 291

Thanks given: 7
Thanked 6 times in 5 posts

Target GMAT Score: 750

PostSat Nov 07, 2009 7:14 am Reply with quote

thanks a lot that was helpful
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
duongthang
GMAT Destroyer!



Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 530

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 3 times in 3 posts

PostMon Nov 09, 2009 6:10 am Reply with quote

it is seldom that "to do" is used as a subject of a sentence.

to do is to do

this pattern is only pattern I see on gmat inwhich "to do" is subject
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1