• Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT

To reduce waste of raw materials, the government

This topic has 1 expert reply and 2 member replies

Top Member

To reduce waste of raw materials, the government

Post Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:18 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    To reduce waste of raw materials, the government of Sperland is considering requiring household appliances to be broken down for salvage when discarded. To cover the cost of salvage, the government is planning to charge a fee, which would be imposed when the appliance is first sold. Imposing the fee at the time of salvage would reduce waste more effectively, however, because consumers tend to keep old appliances longer if they are faced with a fee for discarding them.

    Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

    A. Increasing the cost of disposing of an appliance properly increases the incentive to dispose it improperly.
    B. The fee provides manufacturers with no incentive to produce appliances that are more durable.
    C. For people who have bought new appliances recently, the salvage fee would not need to be paid for a number of years.
    D. People who sell their used, working appliances to others would not need to pay the salvage fee.
    E. Many nonfunctioning appliances that are currently discarded could be repaired at relatively little expense.

    Source:OG

    OA:A

    Experts how do I break down this argument and down with correct ans. Advice Please.

    @GMATGuruNY, Matt@VeritasPrep, DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Fri Jan 06, 2017 9:26 am
    Hello Experts ,

    Please share your thoughts on this.

    Thanks,

    Rashi

    Sun Light Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    12 Jul 2015
    Posted:
    48 messages
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Post Fri Jan 06, 2017 11:50 pm
    Premise: A charge at the time of disposal will push people to use the product for a long time, so that they don't throw it and fully utilise it.

    Conclusion : this will reduce wastage.

    A. Correct, people might just throw anywhere rather than disposing it properly.

    B. Out of scope, manufactures intent is not at the core, the user's intent is at the core of the argument.

    C. Irrelevant.. fee is only charged at the time of disposal... Timing of salvage fee is not queationed.

    Both D and E are strengthners..Both increases the life of the product therefore reducing waste, an idea that we have to weaken...

    Surely, tough one..

    Post Sat Jan 07, 2017 10:52 am
    NandishSS wrote:
    To reduce waste of raw materials, the government of Sperland is considering requiring household appliances to be broken down for salvage when discarded. To cover the cost of salvage, the government is planning to charge a fee, which would be imposed when the appliance is first sold. Imposing the fee at the time of salvage would reduce waste more effectively, however, because consumers tend to keep old appliances longer if they are faced with a fee for discarding them.

    Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

    A. Increasing the cost of disposing of an appliance properly increases the incentive to dispose it improperly.
    B. The fee provides manufacturers with no incentive to produce appliances that are more durable.
    C. For people who have bought new appliances recently, the salvage fee would not need to be paid for a number of years.
    D. People who sell their used, working appliances to others would not need to pay the salvage fee.
    E. Many nonfunctioning appliances that are currently discarded could be repaired at relatively little expense.

    Source:OG

    OA:A

    Experts how do I break down this argument and down with correct ans. Advice Please.

    @GMATGuruNY, Matt@VeritasPrep, DavidG@VeritasPrep
    The conclusion: It's better to charge a fee at the time of disposal/salvage than when an appliance is first sold.
    Premise: If people have to pay a fee at the time of salvage, they'll hold on to the appliance longer.

    We want to weaken this conclusion, so we want to show that charging a fee at the time of disposal/salvage won't work to reduce waste. In effect, we're looking for problems with charging a fee at the time of salvage.

    A gives us a pretty compelling problem. If people dispose of the appliance improperly they'll 1) avoid the fee associated with proper disposal and thus 2) have no incentive to hold on to the appliance for a longer period of time.

    _________________
    Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

    Veritas Prep Reviews
    Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

    Thanked by: rsarashi
    Enroll in a Veritas Prep GMAT class completely for FREE. Wondering if a GMAT course is right for you? Attend the first class session of an actual GMAT course, either in-person or live online, and see for yourself why so many students choose to work with Veritas Prep. Find a class now!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 132 topics
    2 lheiannie07 65 topics
    3 LUANDATO 54 topics
    4 Roland2rule 43 topics
    5 ardz24 40 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    133 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    114 posts
    3 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    113 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    109 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    72 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts