• PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep

Tiger hunting

This topic has 1 expert reply and 9 member replies
tarina Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
06 Mar 2010
Posted:
30 messages

Tiger hunting

Post Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:00 pm
Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild.The countries in which the tigers' habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting.Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species

C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers

D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting

E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers' survival as a guarantee of their survival

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
iamseer Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Posted:
170 messages
Upvotes:
13
Post Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:10 pm
IMO E

Argument says if legislation is enforced, survival will be ensured. And we are asked to find the flaw in the reasoning.

Extinction could be caused by many factors and one of them is hunting. E correctly identifies the flaw: takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers' survival as a guarantee of their survival.

Just adding:
Now, how do we make this argument better?

It would have been better if it said "if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the chances of survival of tigers will improve.

HTH

_________________
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
beat_gmat_09 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
22 Nov 2008
Posted:
437 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Upvotes:
50
Test Date:
TBD
Target GMAT Score:
700
GMAT Score:
580
Post Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:10 pm
tarina wrote:
Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild.The countries in which the tigers' habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting.Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.

The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument

A. assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
B. considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species

C. fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers

D. neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting

E. takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers' survival as a guarantee of their survival
IMO A

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
tarina Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
06 Mar 2010
Posted:
30 messages
Post Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:26 pm
iamseer wrote:
IMO E

Just adding:
Now, how do we make this argument better?

It would have been better if it said "if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the chances of survival of tigers will improve.

HTH
OA E

But as you just added, the successful enforcement can improve the chance. So what about option A?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
iamseer Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Joined
10 Jun 2009
Posted:
170 messages
Upvotes:
13
Post Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:37 pm
tarina wrote:
iamseer wrote:
IMO E

Just adding:
Now, how do we make this argument better?

It would have been better if it said "if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the chances of survival of tigers will improve.

HTH
OA E

But as you just added, the successful enforcement can improve the chance. So what about option A?
The argument is "If these countries can successfully enforce this legislation,...."

"If X happens Y will happen for sure" In this argument, no one is assuming that X could be successfully made to occur. So, that is not a flaw.
HTH

_________________
"Choose to chance the rapids and dance the tides"

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
tarina Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
06 Mar 2010
Posted:
30 messages
Post Fri Apr 30, 2010 11:44 pm
Thanks iamseer

It's quite helpful!

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
jainrahul1985 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
17 Aug 2008
Posted:
228 messages
Upvotes:
4
Post Thu Apr 14, 2011 10:53 pm
Can someone please explain why A is wrong ?

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
bubbliiiiiiii Legendary Member
Joined
14 Apr 2009
Posted:
971 messages
Followed by:
12 members
Upvotes:
49
Test Date:
18.10.2012
Target GMAT Score:
760
GMAT Score:
700
Post Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:50 pm
jainrahul1985 wrote:
Can someone please explain why A is wrong ?
Option A tries to question the enforcement of the proposed legislation whereas its already given in the argument that 'countries can successfully enforce this legislation'.

Thus not A.

Hope it helps.

_________________
Regards,

Pranay

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

GMAT/MBA Expert

Testluv GMAT Instructor Default Avatar
Joined
19 Oct 2009
Posted:
1302 messages
Followed by:
162 members
Upvotes:
539
GMAT Score:
800
Post Thu Apr 14, 2011 11:56 pm
jainrahul1985 wrote:
Can someone please explain why A is wrong ?
The author is very careful in NOT assuming that a ban will be successful because he concludes "IF these countries can successfully enforce this legislation..."

_________________
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Free GMAT Practice Test under Proctored Conditions! - Find a practice test near you or live and online in Kaplan's Classroom Anywhere environment. Register today!
HSPA Legendary Member
Joined
28 Jan 2011
Posted:
1101 messages
Followed by:
13 members
Upvotes:
47
Target GMAT Score:
720
GMAT Score:
640
Post Fri Apr 15, 2011 12:13 am
Wow... weird options but they are not tough

Opinion: Hunting is not the only reason for the decrease in its number.
Tigers are having low birht rate and no illness
Forest area is decreasing.
Legislation to pass the rule will take long time.

A) Argument has no proof that there will be failure in enforcing the legislation.
B) Out of scope
C) huneters success rate is out of scope
D) past efforts are not in consideration
E) Present means of survival is sufficient for their long term survival and considers that hunting is the only impedement.

I agree with OA E

_________________
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
chedaning Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
04 May 2013
Posted:
6 messages
Upvotes:
1
Post Mon May 20, 2013 5:04 am
hi, instrutors.

i wonder that, in the background "Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild". the author has already connected the survival of tiger with the hunting. so if the hunting is decreased ,then the tiger will not soon extinct. But doesn't that conflict with the OA E?

thanks~

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 Roland2rule 181 topics
2 lheiannie07 110 topics
3 ardz24 56 topics
4 LUANDATO 55 topics
5 swerve 51 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

158 posts
2 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

124 posts
3 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

123 posts
4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

111 posts
5 image description EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

81 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts