• Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer

Thyrian Lawmaker

This topic has 1 member reply
komal Legendary Member
Joined
01 Jan 2010
Posted:
777 messages
Followed by:
46 members
Thanked:
117 times
Target GMAT Score:
800

Thyrian Lawmaker

Post Mon Feb 08, 2010 7:29 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Thyrian lawmaker: Thyria's Cheese Importation Board inspects all cheese shipments to Thyria and rejects
    shipments not meeting specified standards. Yet only 1 percent is ever rejected. Therefore, since the health
    consequences and associated economic costs of not rejecting that 1 percent are negligible, whereas the
    board's operating costs are considerable, for economic reasons alone the board should be disbanded.
    Consultant: I disagree. The threat of having their shipments rejected deters many cheese exporters from
    shipping substandard product.

    The consultant responds to the lawmaker's argument by

    (A) rejecting the lawmaker's argument while proposing that the standards according to which the board
    inspects imported cheese should be raised

    (B) providing evidence that the lawmaker's argument has significantly overestimated the cost of maintaining
    the board

    (C) objecting to the lawmaker's introducing into the discussion factors that are not strictly economic

    (D) pointing out a benefit of maintaining the board, which'the lawmaker's argument has failed to consider

    (E) shifting the discussion from the argument at hand to an attack on the integrity of the cheese inspectors

    OA D

    _________________
    https://www.e-gmat.com/

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    Post Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:59 pm
    Notice the term- 'I disagree'. this disagreement is against the conclusion that the board must be disbanded.
    Premise: The threat of having their shipments rejected deters many cheese exporters from
    shipping substandard product.
    so you see the consultant is disagreeing to the conclusion of the lawmaker by showing the advantage the board elicits due to its presence.

    Lets look at options now.

    (A) rejecting the lawmaker's argument while proposing that the standards according to which the board
    inspects imported cheese should be raised [the consultant does not give any further advice. he just shows the advantage of the existence of a board. Eliminated!]

    (B) providing evidence that the lawmaker's argument has significantly overestimated the cost of maintaining
    the board
    [consultant does not attack the cost of maintaining the board at all. Eliminated!]

    (C) objecting to the lawmaker's introducing into the discussion factors that are not strictly economic [neither the lawmaker nor the consultant introduce any other external unrelated factor. Eliminated!]

    (D) pointing out a benefit of maintaining the board, which'the lawmaker's argument has failed to consider [Correct!this perfectly sits in with our reasoning.]

    (E) shifting the discussion from the argument at hand to an attack on the integrity of the cheese inspectors [consultant talks only about the board and not on the integrity of any person. Eliminated!]

    Hope this helps!

    Thanked by: vinodsundaram, NandishSS

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 180 topics
    2 lheiannie07 65 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 44 topics
    5 LUANDATO 23 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    147 posts
    2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    103 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    102 posts
    4 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    94 posts
    5 image description DavidG@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts