teenagers doomed!

[This topic has 9 member replies]
Forum Index GMAT Verbal & Essays
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

ashish1354
Rising GMAT Star



Joined: 30 Jul 2008
Posts: 94

Thanks given: 12
Thanked 2 times in 2 posts
Topic: teenagers doomed!
PostWed Oct 07, 2009 11:30 pm
Elapsed Time:
00:00
 Lap   Why a timer is critical to improving your score
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum wage has risen.
(B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant.
(C) Employers often hire extra help during holiday and warm weather seasons.
(D) The teenage unemployment rate rose more quickly in the 1970’s than it did in the 1960’s.
(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.

OA after some replies
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
punitkaur
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 168

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 5 times in 5 posts
PostThu Oct 08, 2009 12:18 pm
IMO C?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
artistocrat
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 41

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
PostWed Oct 14, 2009 12:47 pm
The answer is B.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kiennguyen
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 73

Thanks given: 5
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
PostThu Oct 22, 2009 1:41 am
IMO A
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
kiennguyen
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 03 Oct 2009
Posts: 73

Thanks given: 5
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
PostSat Oct 24, 2009 1:21 am
anybody please specifies your answers! OA plese!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nakul_anand
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 09 Oct 2009
Posts: 40

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
PostSun Oct 25, 2009 2:23 pm
I think the right answer is (B)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mridula
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 44

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
PostFri Jan 01, 2010 12:53 pm
ashish1354 wrote:
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum wage has risen.
(B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant.
(C) Employers often hire extra help during holiday and warm weather seasons.
(D) The teenage unemployment rate rose more quickly in the 1970’s than it did in the 1960’s.
(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.

OA after some replies
Answer should be A.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from Top Beat The GMAT Member
See All Top Members
gmatmachoman
GMAT Titan

Default Avatar
Most Thanked Member Most Active Member Most Conversational Member
Joined: 28 Jul 2008
Posts: 1135

Thanks given: 89
Thanked 41 times in 38 posts
PostTue Jan 19, 2010 4:04 am
It has to be C
_________________
My Favorite Post..

http://www.beatthegmat.com/appendicitis-t41855.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bhartiindia
Just gettin' started!

Default Avatar

Joined: 05 Jan 2010
Posts: 7

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
PostWed Jan 20, 2010 1:24 pm
IMO A bt why not E??
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Reply from Top Beat The GMAT Member
See All Top Members
komal
Moderator

Most Thanked Member Most Conversational Member
Joined: 01 Jan 2010
Posts: 765

Thanks given: 54
Thanked 47 times in 45 posts
Location: Mumbai, India

Target GMAT Score: 800
PostTue Jan 26, 2010 6:44 am
3)Author states teenage unemployment rate will cease to rise if minimum wage is lowered. To weaken this we have to prove minimum wage has no effect on unemployment rate.
A.Supports the argument.
B. correct if unemployment rate keeps on rising when minimum wage is constant then this weakens the conclusion
C.Irrelevant
D.Irrelevant
E. this happens only once in a while and has no impact on the conclusion
_________________
Aim For The Stars, U'll Atleast End Up On The Moon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Forum Index GMAT Verbal & Essays
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. kstv 322 posts
2. shashank.ism 312 posts
3. harsh.champ 308 posts
4. gmatmachoman 256 posts
5. thephoenix 238 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher 		97 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher 		58 posts
3. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher 		51 posts
4. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting 		49 posts
5. Bryant@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep 		41 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts