| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hduraiswamy1982 Just gettin' started!
Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 5
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:18 pm Post subject: Simple DS question |
|
|
I thought the answer is (d) but apparently I got it wrong
any explanation?
The answer is (b) by the way
_________________ Good times ahead!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
hduraiswamy1982 Just gettin' started!
Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 5
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 7:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Source: hellochampion.com
_________________ Good times ahead!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
discreet Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 69
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Second statement says K - L is positive,
This means K - L > 0
=> so, K > L , sufficient.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jay2007 Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 02 Jul 2007 Posts: 50
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Does K>2L imply that K>L
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
owodee Just gettin' started!
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Posts: 17
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Note that for (1), K>2L does not mean K>L.
For instance, take K=-5, and L=-4,
Thus K<L.
Since L=-4, 2L=-8
Thus K>2L
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
hduraiswamy1982 Just gettin' started!
Joined: 09 Jul 2007 Posts: 5
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Chicago
|
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2007 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you guys, appreciate it
_________________ Good times ahead!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|