Similar Reasoning

[This topic has 1 expert reply and 1 member reply]
Free $100 Amazon.com Gift Card - Buy a GMAT course using a Beat The GMAT discount code between Mar 8-22 and get a $100 Amazon.com Gift Card. Learn more!
Post New Topic   Post Reply

italian7745
Rising GMAT Star

Default Avatar

Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 82

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 2 times in 2 posts

Topic: Similar Reasoning
PostFri Nov 06, 2009 12:56 am

Elapsed Time:
00:00
Lap   Why a timer is critical to improving your score

Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dangerous. I would never use it on a patient.

Dr. B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective.

Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless.

In which of the following is the reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.

(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.

(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.

(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.

(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thanked by: Testluv
Reply from GMAT/MBA Admissions Expert
Testluv
GMAT Instructor

Default Avatar Joined: 19 Oct 2009
Posts: 758

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 179 times in 158 posts
Location: Toronto

GMAT Score: 800

PostFri Nov 06, 2009 1:18 am

italian7745 wrote:
Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dangerous. I would never use it on a patient.

Dr. B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective.

Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless.

In which of the following is the reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.

(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.

(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.

(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.

(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.
Hi Italian 7745,

Dr. A’s argument is classical circular reasoning: the evidence (that the vaccine is worthless) is the same as his conclusion (vaccine is useless). In this context, “worthless,” and “useless” are the same.
Choice C matches this: The conclusion here is that these balls perform the best. The evidence is that they are most effective. This is the same thing.
Choose C.
Let me know if a particular answer choice was bothering you.
As an aside, this is a parallel reasoning question, which is a staple question on the LSAT. I don’t think I’ve ever seen an official GMAT question that was parallel reasoning. In other words, probably wasting your time studying this kind of question.

(Accidentally hit the thanks button instead of the quote button!)

_________________
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
joyseychow
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!

Default Avatar

Joined: 15 Dec 2008
Posts: 121

Thanks given: 7
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts

PostSat Nov 07, 2009 7:26 am

Testluv wrote:
italian7745 wrote:
Dr. A: The new influenza vaccine is useless at best and possibly dangerous. I would never use it on a patient.

Dr. B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective.

Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless.

In which of the following is the reasoning most similar to that of Dr. A?

(A) Three of my patients have been harmed by that vaccine during the past three weeks, so the vaccine is unsafe.

(B) Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk, and I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk.

(C) Wingzz tennis balls perform best because they are far more effective than any other tennis balls.

(D) I’m buying Vim Vitamins. Doctors recommend them more often than they recommend any other vitamins, so Vim Vitamins must be good.

(E) Since University of Muldoon graduates score about 20 percent higher than average on the GMAT, Sheila Lee, a University of Muldoon graduate, will score about 20 percent higher than average when she takes the GMAT.
Hi Italian 7745,

Dr. A’s argument is classical circular reasoning: the evidence (that the vaccine is worthless) is the same as his conclusion (vaccine is useless). In this context, “worthless,” and “useless” are the same.
Choice C matches this: The conclusion here is that these balls perform the best. The evidence is that they are most effective. This is the same thing.
Choose C.
Let me know if a particular answer choice was bothering you.
As an aside, this is a parallel reasoning question, which is a staple question on the LSAT. I don’t think I’ve ever seen an official GMAT question that was parallel reasoning. In other words, probably wasting your time studying this kind of question.

(Accidentally hit the thanks button instead of the quote button!)
Testluv, just for discussion sake, why B not acceptable?
Jerrold Jersey recommends this milk = Dr.B: But three studies published in the Journal of Medical Associates have rated that vaccine as unusually effective.

I don’t trust Jerrold Jersey, so I won’t buy this milk = Dr. A: The studies must have been faulty because the vaccine is worthless.

It does illustrate Dr. A's stubbornness of insisting the vaccine is worthless despite of evidence.

Does it make sense? Pls. correct me if I'm wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post New Topic   Post Reply All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1
 
Most Active Members in Last 30 Days
1. kstv 322 posts
2. shashank.ism 312 posts
3. harsh.champ 308 posts
4. gmatmachoman 256 posts
5. thephoenix 238 posts
Most Active Experts in Last 30 Days
1. lunarpower
Manhattan GMAT Teacher
97 posts
2. Stuart Kovinsky
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
58 posts
3. Testluv
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
51 posts
4. Lisa Anderson
Stacy Blackman Consulting
49 posts
5. Bryant@VeritasPrep
Veritas Prep
41 posts