Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

Silkweed

This topic has 3 member replies
ranjeet75 Really wants to Beat The GMAT! Default Avatar
Joined
01 Aug 2008
Posted:
242 messages
Thanked:
6 times
Test Date:
15/02/2011
Target GMAT Score:
750
Silkweed Post Sat May 05, 2012 10:37 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Few insects are able to feed on the leaves of silkweed, a toxic plant, by first cutting and draining the vein that secretes the toxin. This method of detoxification guarantees that some insects will always be able to eat silkweed, because the plant could never evolve to produce a toxin that is lethal in the trace amounts left after the vein is cut.

    The argument depends on which of the following assumptions?

    A. The insects that successfully detoxify silkweed are not able to undergo the evolutionary changes necessary to allow them to detoxify other plants.
    B. Unlike silkweed, other kinds of toxic plants would be able to overcome their vulnerabilities to predators through evolutionary changes.
    C. The toxin-carrying veins of the mildewed plant can never evolve in such a way that insects cannot cut through.
    D. The method of detoxification used by insect predators of mildewed would not successfully detoxify other kinds of toxic plants.
    E. There are insects that use means other than draining the toxin in order to feed on toxic plants.

    OA is [spoiler]C[/spoiler]

    I couldn't understand the reasoning how [spoiler]C[/spoiler] is correct. Please substantiate your answer with reasons.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    chandan.mnnit Just gettin' started! Default Avatar
    Joined
    06 Feb 2012
    Posted:
    5 messages
    Post Sat May 05, 2012 11:32 pm
    [quote="ranjeet75"]Few insects are able to feed on the leaves of silkweed, a toxic plant, by first cutting and draining the vein that secretes the toxin. This method of detoxification guarantees that some insects will always be able to eat silkweed, because the plant could never evolve to produce a toxin that is lethal in the trace amounts left after the vein is cut.

    The argument depends on which of the following assumptions?

    A. The insects that successfully detoxify silkweed are not able to undergo the evolutionary changes necessary to allow them to detoxify other plants.
    B. Unlike silkweed, other kinds of toxic plants would be able to overcome their vulnerabilities to predators through evolutionary changes.
    C. The toxin-carrying veins of the mildewed plant can never evolve in such a way that insects cannot cut through.
    D. The method of detoxification used by insect predators of mildewed would not successfully detoxify other kinds of toxic plants.
    E. There are insects that use means other than draining the toxin in order to feed on toxic plants.

    The Argument has the conclusion that "This method of detoxification guarantees that some insects will always be able to eat silkweed, because the plant could never evolve to produce a toxin that is lethal in the trace amounts left after the vein is cut." The conclusion is based on the argument that the Plant will never evolve to produce a toxin that i lethal in the trace amt left after the vein is cut." What if the Plant evolves a technique that makes it impossible for the insect to cut the vein carrying lethal toxins. In this case the conclusion given by the author would be deemed senseless. Hence we need to assume that the "The toxin-carrying veins of the mildewed plant can never evolve in such a way that insects cannot cut through." to make the conclusion valid.
    Hope it helps.!!

    vk_vinayak GMAT Destroyer!
    Joined
    04 Jun 2008
    Posted:
    502 messages
    Followed by:
    20 members
    Thanked:
    97 times
    Post Sun May 06, 2012 8:36 am
    Is there a spelling mistake in the argument typed?

    The argument talks about Silkweed plant. Only once answer choice mentions the Silkweed plant, and rest others, including the OA, talk about some other plant, Milkweed.

    _________________
    - VK

    I will (Learn. Recognize. Apply)

    ice_rush GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    25 Mar 2012
    Posted:
    336 messages
    Followed by:
    3 members
    Thanked:
    14 times
    Test Date:
    04/10/2013
    Target GMAT Score:
    700+
    GMAT Score:
    650
    Post Sun May 06, 2012 11:01 am
    Negation of (C): The toxin-carrying veins of the mildewed plant can evolve in such a way that insects cannot cut through ---> negation destroys the conclusion and therefore is a necessary assumption for the argument.

    hope this helps

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 varun289 42 topics
    2 greenwich 25 topics
    3 guerrero 20 topics
    4 sana.noor 19 topics
    5 killerdrummer 19 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    196 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    143 posts
    3 image description Anju@Gurome

    Gurome

    121 posts
    4 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    86 posts
    5 image description David@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    41 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts