sharks...

New MBA Student Life Forum: Ask your questions to current MBA students from Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Kellogg and Haas

Post new topic   Reply to topic

shipra
Rising GMAT Star



Joined: 26 May 2008
Posts: 74

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Dubai

Topic: sharks...
PostTue Jun 24, 2008 8:43 pm Reply with quote

79. The metabolic rate of sharks is low compared with the rates of most other fishes.
(A) with the rates of most other fishes
(B) to most other fishes' rate
(C) to that of rates for most other fishes
(D) to most other fishes
(E) with most other fishes


can sum1 pls tell me the difference bw 'compared to' and 'compared with'?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
loki.gmat
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!



Joined: 24 May 2008
Posts: 182

Thanks given: 1
Thanked 4 times in 4 posts

PostTue Jun 24, 2008 9:54 pm Reply with quote

to show comparison between unlike things, compare to is used.
eg.He compared T20 cricket match to a hindi movie.

to show comparison between like things, compare with is used.
eg.The police compared the duplicate document with the original.

hence B C n D r out.
E - metabolic rate is compared with fishes. hence incorrect.


hence IMO A.


Thanks!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nareshattri
Just gettin' started!



Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Posts: 10

Thanks given: 2
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts

PostWed Jun 25, 2008 1:36 am Reply with quote

Yes, IMO A is the correct answer for the same reasons that loki stated. Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
reachac
Moderator



Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 570

Thanks given: 3
Thanked 20 times in 19 posts

Test Date: 7th Aug
Target GMAT Score: 770
GMAT Score: 780

PostWed Jun 25, 2008 7:09 am Reply with quote

IMO A

Loki is rite, 'comapred to' for unlike things and 'comapred with' for like things
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   

Post new topic   Reply to topic All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1