The world's finest single-malt whiskies come from the highland of Scotland. If the quality of the blended whisky derives from the quality of its component ingredients, then MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies.
The argument above could be seriously weaken if which of the followin were true?
A. The more single-malt whiskies involved in the batch of blended whisky, the finer the quality of whisky.
B. Whereas many of MacDuff's competitors have been in industry for decades or even century, the MacDuff brand was created within the last decade by marketing committee.
C. Including more than five single-malt whiskies in a blended whisky is a waste, because no one can taste that many component flavors.
D. A blended whisky is as fine as the average quality of its components.
E. The concept of "finest" in a whisky is a subjective measure that cannot be quantified in a statistically valid way.
OA Later
Scotch
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 8:47 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
It feels like a close tie between C and D.
But the Argument tells that the quality of the whisky is derived from its components. But not about how it is derived.
As option D helps me find out how that derivation works and the result thus will be opposite two what the author states here.
D is the answer.
But the Argument tells that the quality of the whisky is derived from its components. But not about how it is derived.
As option D helps me find out how that derivation works and the result thus will be opposite two what the author states here.
D is the answer.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:3 members
I did not get this question.reply2spg wrote:The world's finest single-malt whiskies come from the highland of Scotland. If the quality of the blended whisky derives from the quality of its component ingredients, then MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies.
The argument above could be seriously weaken if which of the followin were true?
A. The more single-malt whiskies involved in the batch of blended whisky, the finer the quality of whisky.
B. Whereas many of MacDuff's competitors have been in industry for decades or even century, the MacDuff brand was created within the last decade by marketing committee.
C. Including more than five single-malt whiskies in a blended whisky is a waste, because no one can taste that many component flavors.
D. A blended whisky is as fine as the average quality of its components.
E. The concept of "finest" in a whisky is a subjective measure that cannot be quantified in a statistically valid way.
OA Later
Can somebody explain the why the credited answer is correct?
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 11:56 pm
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:1 members
IMO D
simple :
You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A
So avg rating = 6
D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6
clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.
simple :
You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A
So avg rating = 6
D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6
clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:08 am
- Thanked: 6 times
My method of reasoning wasFightWithGMAT wrote:reply2spg wrote:The world's finest single-malt whiskies come from the highland of Scotland. If the quality of the blended whisky derives from the quality of its component ingredients, then MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies.
The argument above could be seriously weaken if which of the followin were true?
A. The more single-malt whiskies involved in the batch of blended whisky, the finer the quality of whisky.
B. Whereas many of MacDuff's competitors have been in industry for decades or even century, the MacDuff brand was created within the last decade by marketing committee.
C. Including more than five single-malt whiskies in a blended whisky is a waste, because no one can taste that many component flavors.
D. A blended whisky is as fine as the average quality of its components.
E. The concept of "finest" in a whisky is a subjective measure that cannot be quantified in a statistically valid way.
OA Later
I did not get this question.
Can somebody explain the why the credited answer is correct?
Conclusion " MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies"
How can finest be average : If 5 finest malt whisky make one average blend whisky , option D suggest fine blended whisky is an average qaulity, than finest Macduff whisky is not a finest whisky - that is not the conclusion.
Thanks for posting this question : Now I can make difference in BP and JD. JD is Single malt premium stoch and BP is blended whisky.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:3 members
Hey Thanks Man!!!paes wrote:IMO D
simple :
You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A
So avg rating = 6
D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6
clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.
Awesome is your maths!!! I got the clue from ur explanation
Actually, the argument says that quality of a blend is proportional to that of its components.
D denies this, saying that such proportionality does not exists.
Rather
quality of a blend is linked to the AVERAGE of the qualities of its components.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 364
- Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 5:13 am
- Thanked: 31 times
- Followed by:3 members
GMAC... you are very tricky the way you phrase questions and answer choices.FightWithGMAT wrote:Hey Thanks Man!!!paes wrote:IMO D
simple :
You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A
So avg rating = 6
D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6
clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.
Awesome is your maths!!! I got the clue from ur explanation
Actually, the argument says that quality of a blend is proportional to that of its components.
D denies this, saying that such proportionality does not exists.
Rather
quality of a blend is linked to the AVERAGE of the qualities of its components.
- ikaplan
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:06 pm
- Thanked: 17 times
- Followed by:1 members
I was stuck between C and D. I read the question again and I try to find out why I should have eliminated C in the first place. The stem says 'no fewer than 5'. It means exactly 5 but not less right? If the latter is true, than C can be eliminated for exaggeration (more than five is out of scope). I would be grateful if someone can clarify my reasoning.
"Commitment is more than just wishing for the right conditions. Commitment is working with what you have."
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:23 pm
- Thanked: 7 times
- Followed by:1 members
@ikaplan
it is critical to distinguish between world's finesh whiskies (WFWs) and finesh whisky in the world (FWW)
WFWs come from scotland.
The new whiskey blends =5 or greater than 5 of WFWs.
The assumption here is FWW is rated > WFW's each are.
Assumption 2 is that the 5 or more that were blended to get FWW, have top rating among all WFWs.
Best case scenario, If =5, even if all the 5 WFWs are rated 10/10, FWW=10
>5 can only get worser.
Thanks
it is critical to distinguish between world's finesh whiskies (WFWs) and finesh whisky in the world (FWW)
WFWs come from scotland.
The new whiskey blends =5 or greater than 5 of WFWs.
The assumption here is FWW is rated > WFW's each are.
Assumption 2 is that the 5 or more that were blended to get FWW, have top rating among all WFWs.
Best case scenario, If =5, even if all the 5 WFWs are rated 10/10, FWW=10
>5 can only get worser.
Thanks
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:39 pm
i was confused between C and D but i chose the wrong answer option C.i am still not getting it cna anyone please explain it to me in more detail.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2011 10:04 am
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:4 members
IMO D
reply2spg wrote:The world's finest single-malt whiskies come from the highland of Scotland. If the quality of the blended whisky derives from the quality of its component ingredients, then MacDuff's whisky must be the finest whisky in the world, because it blends no fewer than five Scotland's finest single-malt whiskies.
The argument above could be seriously weaken if which of the followin were true?
A. The more single-malt whiskies involved in the batch of blended whisky, the finer the quality of whisky.
B. Whereas many of MacDuff's competitors have been in industry for decades or even century, the MacDuff brand was created within the last decade by marketing committee.
C. Including more than five single-malt whiskies in a blended whisky is a waste, because no one can taste that many component flavors.
D. A blended whisky is as fine as the average quality of its components.
E. The concept of "finest" in a whisky is a subjective measure that cannot be quantified in a statistically valid way.
OA Later
- tuanquang269
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
- Location: Vietnam
- Thanked: 10 times
- Followed by:5 members
Very easy one. IMO D. For two reason:
If 5 finest whiskies have different rank. The average will lower than the highest rank.
If 5 finest whiskies have same rank. For example, #1, why they did not sell 5 different whiskies rather than combine them.
If 5 finest whiskies have different rank. The average will lower than the highest rank.
If 5 finest whiskies have same rank. For example, #1, why they did not sell 5 different whiskies rather than combine them.
- tuanquang269
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
- Location: Vietnam
- Thanked: 10 times
- Followed by:5 members
Nope, 6<8. He type erroredirik wrote:Sorry but I did not understand how you get to the 10. Mean is 6 Ok, but how do you come up with the 10?
paes wrote:IMO D
simple :
You are mixing 5 components with rating : 4 5 6 7 8 -to make new component A
So avg rating = 6
D says : rating of the new component A = avg rating = 6
clearly 6 < 10, so it is not the best.