The first thing that jumped out at me when I read the question was "it". What is it? Where is its antecendant? Is it Germany, nuclear power or energy? It's not clear.
This signalled to me that this was a pronoun sc correction problem, and that the best solution would have to fix the ambiguity related to it. In particular, the correct answer should make it clear that 'it' is actually energy derived from nuclear power within the respective country (i.e., Germany)
I then scanned the answer choices and the only one that clearly fixes this ambiguity is C. D is tempting, but was the nuclear power derived from energy produced in Germany? We're not told anything about where it was produced - perhaps it was produced in France?!
IMO C, was quite clearly the correct answer. All I had to rely on for this was the pronoun error.
p.s., I'm not familiar with the distinction between compared vs whereas. How could I have immediately knocked out compared using this rule?
Thanks
SC-Help
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
your heart's in the right place, but just make sure you know that ambiguity alone doesn't make a pronoun incorrect -- there are lots and lots and lots and lots of official problems on which the correct answer contains a technically ambiguous pronoun. see here:tgou008 wrote:The first thing that jumped out at me when I read the question was "it". What is it? Where is its antecendant? Is it Germany, nuclear power or energy? It's not clear.
This signalled to me that this was a pronoun sc correction problem, and that the best solution would have to fix the ambiguity related to it. In particular, the correct answer should make it clear that 'it' is actually energy derived from nuclear power within the respective country (i.e., Germany)
I then scanned the answer choices and the only one that clearly fixes this ambiguity is C. D is tempting, but was the nuclear power derived from energy produced in Germany? We're not told anything about where it was produced - perhaps it was produced in France?!
IMO C, was quite clearly the correct answer. All I had to rely on for this was the pronoun error.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/pronoun-ambi ... tml#305959
the real issue with the pronoun in that sentence isn't ambiguity -- it's incorrectness. there's *no* noun in that sentence that is completely logical as a replacement for "it".
i'm glad you aren't familiar with that distinction, because it's not actually a "distinction" at all; those are two completely different structures. (in general, you should *not* assume that distinctions present in the answer choices are actionable, or can producing rules, unless the different options are presented in an otherwise identical context.)p.s., I'm not familiar with the distinction between compared vs whereas. How could I have immediately knocked out compared using this rule?
--
"whereas" is a conjunction that indicates contrast. it's a lot like "but", except, unlike "but", it can appear at the beginning of a sentence:
whereas only 10% of the employees had signed up for the program by the end of january, that number had risen to 44% by the end of february.
I speak parlache, the slang-heavy dialect of MedellÃn, whereas my wife speaks textbook Castilian Spanish.
(notice that "but" would work just as well in the second of these sentences, but not in the first)
--
if you have a sentence that says "compared to/with", then the purpose is (obviously) to make a comparison.
the sentence CANNOT also say a comparison word, such as more, less, greater, prefer, better, worse, etc. to use "compared to/with", you just STATE the objective statistics/facts to be compared, without using any other comparison word.
examples:
*this year's unemployment rate of 12% is three times as great compared to the rate in 1994 --> INCORRECT (redundant -- you already have "3x as great", so "compared" is superfluous)
this year's unemployment rate is 12%, compared to 4% in 1994 --> CORRECT
i.e., you just come out and SAY the statistics, and then give "compared to/with"
Last edited by lunarpower on Wed Jul 04, 2012 5:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2011 9:39 pm
my official answer is E.i chose the right form compared with is more appropriate but got the wrong answer
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 160
- Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 1:09 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:1 members
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 11:08 pm
Actually this is the reason why I've picked E instead of C.adilka wrote:First, the OA is attached in the picture below (from GMATPrep). Circled in blue square. I chose E.
Here's my question: is anyone else confused by this part of the sentence?
"Over 75 percent of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power"
Energy produced in France derives? Excuse me?? Isn't it grammatically incorrect?
SHould be either:
"Over 75 percent of the energy produced in France is derivED from"
or
"Over 75 percent of the energy produced, France derives from" (notice the absence of "in" before France)
I understand the answer itself, but I dont understand the grammatical mistake on GMAT. Or maybe the mistake is in my brain
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
remember that questioning the official answers is a waste of your time.adilka wrote:Energy produced in France derives? Excuse me?? Isn't it grammatically incorrect?
the answer to "is this official answer incorrect?" will be yes in 0% of cases. it will be no in the other 100% of cases.
therefore, this is a pointless question to ask (especially with the sort of attitude that's evident here -- that's certainly not going to help anyone, either). a better question to ask is, "why is this correct? what am i not understand here? what can i LEARN here?"
if that isn't the attitude you're taking into this, then it's going to be extremely difficult for you to improve.
--
the active verb "derive" can be used, correctly, in this way.
the meaning is relatively close to that of the passive form ("to be derived"), but there's a difference: "X derives from Y" just means that X somehow comes from Y (in whatever way -- intentionally or organically), while "X is derived from Y" specifically implies that this is effected by human beings.
e.g.
x% of the energy in France derives from nuclear power --> correct (this is the source of the energy)
x% of the energy in France is derived from nuclear power --> also correct (because this is done by human beings)
human emotions derive from our evolutionary history --> makes sense
human emotions are derived from our evolutionary history --> wrong; this is nonsense (people don't actually derive these emotions; the sentence is just supposed to say that's where the emotions come from.)
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2012 10:38 am
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 6:07 am
I could not understand why it is C. If will see the parallelism and comparison, i all respect D fits in the rules. "Over 75 percent of the energy" and "over 33 percent of the energy".
Please explain.
IMO is D
Please explain.
IMO is D
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 11:46 pm
Where is answer ???
For god' sake please post the answer and explanation also.
atleast after a day of posting the question.
or else there is no use in using the Verbal thread, infact all the discussions lead to mere confusion.
My suggestion to the moderator/admin or to the person who posted the question
Please post the answer atleast if not explanation for the question after 1 day.
That would be helpful.
Thank you.
For god' sake please post the answer and explanation also.
atleast after a day of posting the question.
or else there is no use in using the Verbal thread, infact all the discussions lead to mere confusion.
My suggestion to the moderator/admin or to the person who posted the question
Please post the answer atleast if not explanation for the question after 1 day.
That would be helpful.
Thank you.
A) confusing: not sure whether "it" refers to nuclear power or energy
B) wrong: the comparison is between the energy produced from nuclear power in France and Germany
C) parallelism issue
D) Correct
E) againt the pronoun "it" is confusing
Choose D
B) wrong: the comparison is between the energy produced from nuclear power in France and Germany
C) parallelism issue
D) Correct
E) againt the pronoun "it" is confusing
Choose D
- theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
D sounds as if out of 75% of energy produced in France, 33% comes from Germany's nuclear powerndqv wrote:A) confusing: not sure whether "it" refers to nuclear power or energy
B) wrong: the comparison is between the energy produced from nuclear power in France and Germany
C) parallelism issue
D) Correct
E) againt the pronoun "it" is confusing
Choose D
R A H U L
- jaspreetsra
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2014 10:26 pm
- Thanked: 1 times