| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
codesnooker GMAT Destroyer!

Joined: 18 Jan 2008 Posts: 359
Thanks given: 8 Thanked 18 times in 18 posts
Test Date: Soon Target GMAT Score: 800 GMAT Score: 580
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:52 am Post subject: Salary :D |
|
|
How to solve this question?
_________________ Code Snooker | Happy to Help
---------------------------------
Born to WIN
http://btg760.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
olika Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 10 Nov 2007 Posts: 41
Thanks given: 11 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 8:38 am Post subject: Re: Salary :D |
|
|
Is the answer "C"?
I would solve it in this way.
Lets label 'K'- Karen's salary in '95 and 'J' - Jason's salary in '95.
In 1995, the difference between Karen's salary and Jason's salary was 2,000 (K-J=2,000).
In 1998, the gap between their salaries increased by 400, which represents "p" percent. So, we have 2,000 is 100% and 400 is p%. Solving this, we get p=20%.
The answer is C. We need both statements.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ksh Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 17 Feb 2008 Posts: 107
Thanks given: 1 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 4:56 am Post subject: Re: Salary :D |
|
|
| olika wrote: | Is the answer "C"?
I would solve it in this way.
Lets label 'K'- Karen's salary in '95 and 'J' - Jason's salary in '95.
In 1995, the difference between Karen's salary and Jason's salary was 2,000 (K-J=2,000).
In 1998, the gap between their salaries increased by 400, which represents "p" percent. So, we have 2,000 is 100% and 400 is p%. Solving this, we get p=20%.
The answer is C. We need both statements. |
From the available data (combining 1+2), we can get value of p i.e. $440. But certaily in percentage term it can not be derived since Jason's salary is not mentioned. What is the OA codesnooker?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
olika Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 10 Nov 2007 Posts: 41
Thanks given: 11 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: Re: Salary :D |
|
|
| ksh wrote: | | From the available data (combining 1+2), we can get value of p i.e. $440. But certaily in percentage term it can not be derived since Jason's salary is not mentioned. What is the OA codesnooker? |
Give your solution
You can solve this problem in more complicated way... But still you'll get the answer C.
Lets
K - Karen's salary in '95
J - Jason's salary in '95
(100K+KP)/100 - Karen's salary in '98
(100J+JP)/100 - Jason's salary in '98
Then
K-J=2000
((100K+KP)/100) - ((100J+JP)/100)=2400
Solving these two equations, you will get p=100*400/2000, which means that C is correct answer
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
 |
lunarpower GMAT Instructor

Joined: 03 Mar 2008 Posts: 361
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 29 times in 29 posts
GMAT Score: 800
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
remember that you can think of percentage increases in the same way in which you'd think of just multiplying by a constant - because that's all that percentage increases really are, after all.*
simpler analogy:
let's say you multiply a series of numbers x, y, and z by some unknown constant. now let's say i tell you that the gaps between the numbers are 3 times as big as they used to be.
what does this mean?
it means that we must have tripled the numbers, because the size of the gaps increases proportionally with the size of the numbers themselves.
this means that, if we know the number by which the gaps between the numbers have been multiplied (which is the same as knowing the % change in those gaps), we'll also know the multiplier / % change for the numbers themselves.
in this problem, if we take the 2 statements together, we know that the gap between the salaries has increased by a factor of 2440/2000 = 1.22; this means a percentage increase of 22%. (note that you don't really care about the specific percentages, since this is data sufficiency; all that matters is that you can find them.)
therefore, the salaries themselves have increased by 22 percent.
that means both statements together are sufficient.
--
note that none of the above reasoning is valid if the quantities increase by different percentages.
--
*as a side note, it's extremely useful to be able to use percentage multipliers for percent increases. some examples:
to increase a quantity by 14%, multiply by 1.14
to increase a quantity by 70%, multiply by 1.7
to decrease a quantity by 14%, multiply by 0.86
to decrease a quantity by 70%, multiply by 0.3
etc.
_________________ ron purewal
instructor, mgmat
Learn more about me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.
|
|