• e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider

Saffir-Simpson Scale

This topic has 18 member replies
Goto page
  • 1,
  • 2
Next
blackarrow Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
19 Mar 2009
Posted:
104 messages
Upvotes:
6
Target GMAT Score:
740

Saffir-Simpson Scale

Post Thu Mar 26, 2009 10:15 pm
The category 1 to 5 rating known as the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale provides an estimate of a hurricane's potential of destroying or damaging property, and is primarily determined from wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds so high as to blow away small buildings, completely destroy mobile homes, and cause severe window and door damage.


a)of destroying or damaging property, and is primarily determined from wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds so high as
b)to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined from wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds high enough
c)of destroying or damaging property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds so high as
d)to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds high enough
e)to destroy or damage property, and is primarily determined by wind speed; a category 5 storm has wind speeds so high as


Source- MGMAT SC. Difficulty level 700-800

_________________
Its better to burn out than to fade away

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
cm47323 Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
21 Oct 2008
Posted:
26 messages
Upvotes:
3
GMAT Score:
770
Top Reply
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:52 am
blackarrow - what is the source of the question? GMAC seems to have changed its mind on this idiom. OG11 SC 33 - Choice C uses the "So x as to y" construct and is deemed unidiomatic. This is in contrast to prior OGs. If this question was from a third party publication which was based on OG 10, C is probably wrong and we should ignore the question.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
orel Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
27 Jul 2008
Posted:
247 messages
Upvotes:
2
Target GMAT Score:
720
GMAT Score:
660
Top Reply
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:05 am
Is there any explanation why "so high as...", please???

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
cm47323 Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
21 Oct 2008
Posted:
26 messages
Upvotes:
3
GMAT Score:
770
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 8:52 am
blackarrow - what is the source of the question? GMAC seems to have changed its mind on this idiom. OG11 SC 33 - Choice C uses the "So x as to y" construct and is deemed unidiomatic. This is in contrast to prior OGs. If this question was from a third party publication which was based on OG 10, C is probably wrong and we should ignore the question.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
orel Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
27 Jul 2008
Posted:
247 messages
Upvotes:
2
Target GMAT Score:
720
GMAT Score:
660
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 6:05 am
Is there any explanation why "so high as...", please???

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
gmat740 MBA Student
Joined
16 Aug 2008
Posted:
1194 messages
Followed by:
15 members
Upvotes:
71
GMAT Score:
710
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:30 pm
Feruza

It is good to say the original sentence can be wrong, but it's not good to change the meaning of the original sentence


If we are given :
I played basketball yesterday
And one of the option says:

I played basketball yesterday with my friends.

Although both mean the same that" I played basketball yesterday"

but it never says anything about friends, may be I played alone or with friends etc


So is the option correct??

I hope this clear what I mean to say the MEANING OF THE ORIGINAL SENTENCE

Karan

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
orel Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
27 Jul 2008
Posted:
247 messages
Upvotes:
2
Target GMAT Score:
720
GMAT Score:
660
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:06 pm
Gmat740,

But it is possible that he original sentence can be wrong, right? That is the reason we have other four options.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
gmat740 MBA Student
Joined
16 Aug 2008
Posted:
1194 messages
Followed by:
15 members
Upvotes:
71
GMAT Score:
710
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 4:56 pm
I agree with tedcornell even after reading your explanation for OA

Determined By v/s Determined from

I think both the idioms are correct depending upon their use.

Determined By: when Only Wind speed is the parameter

determined from : result is derived from the wind speed.

Since the original sentence says Determined from i.e result is derived from wind speed, we cannot change its meaning in the answer


Please explain if I am wrong somewhere

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
blackarrow Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
19 Mar 2009
Posted:
104 messages
Upvotes:
6
Target GMAT Score:
740
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 9:55 am
cm47323,

Please llok carefully, i had mentioned whats the source+ the difficulty bin of the question when I posted the question itself ( small font)

The explaination is(manhattan)... and I agree :-

When referring to y as the potential outcome of x, the correct idiom is "x's potential to y." This sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as "a hurricane's potential of destroying or damaging." When referring to the use of y to determine x, the correct idiom is "x is determined by y." This sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as "potential is determined from wind speeds." Finally, there is a subtle distinction between the idiom "so x as to y" and "x is enough to y." The original sentence uses the idiom "so x as to y" to indicate that characteristic x is so extreme in the particular case that y results. In contrast, the idiom "x is enough to y" is used when x is the criteria by which an ability to achieve y is measured. Thus, if a sentence stated that "a category 5 storm has wind speeds high enough to blow away small buildings," this would convey a different meaning: that wind speeds are the criteria by which one measures the ability to blow away small houses.

(A) This choice is incorrect as it repeats the original sentence.

(B) When referring to the use of y to determine x, the correct idiom is "x is determined by y." This sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as "potential is determined from wind speeds." The change from the original idiom "wind speeds so high as to..." to the idiom presented in this sentence "high enough to..." changes the original meaning of the sentence; it conveys that wind speeds are the criteria by which one measures the ability to blow away small houses. The idiom "so x as to y" is required instead to match the original meaning: that characteristic x (the wind speed) is so extreme in the particular case (a category 5 storm) that y results (small houses are blown away).

(C) When referring to y as the potential outcome of x, the correct idiom is "x's potential to y." This sentence incorrectly phrases the idiom as "a hurricane's potential of destroying or damaging."

(D) The idiom "high enough to blow away small buildings" changes the original meaning; it conveys that wind speeds are the criteria by which one measures the ability to blow away small houses. The idiom "so x as to y" is required instead to match the original meaning: that characteristic x (the wind speed) is so extreme in the particular case (a category 5 storm) that y results (small houses are blown away).

(E) CORRECT. All idioms in the sentence are used correctly.

_________________
Its better to burn out than to fade away

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
Thanked by: imyuva
blackarrow Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
19 Mar 2009
Posted:
104 messages
Upvotes:
6
Target GMAT Score:
740
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:57 am
OA is E

_________________
Its better to burn out than to fade away

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
orel Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
27 Jul 2008
Posted:
247 messages
Upvotes:
2
Target GMAT Score:
720
GMAT Score:
660
Post Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:10 am
IMO OA is D.
"so high as to blow.." sounds like an exaggeration, doesn't it?
"high enough to blow.." is more moderate... and more scientific, IMO.

And i'd go with "determined by.."
Am I totally incorrect? Shocked
OA please!

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
bjp2008 Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
30 Sep 2008
Posted:
25 messages
Post Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:19 pm
delhiboy1979 wrote:
E looks the right option to me.

To destroy is correct. determnined by is correct and also correct use of idiom so..as.
Also think the same. It should be E. What is OA..

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
TedCornell Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
09 Mar 2009
Posted:
207 messages
Followed by:
22 members
Upvotes:
115
Test Date:
March 9 2009
GMAT Score:
750
Post Fri Mar 27, 2009 10:12 am
ouch

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
delhiboy1979 Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
11 Feb 2009
Posted:
239 messages
Post Fri Mar 27, 2009 3:17 am
E looks the right option to me.

To destroy is correct. determnined by is correct and also correct use of idiom so..as.

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag
blackarrow Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
19 Mar 2009
Posted:
104 messages
Upvotes:
6
Target GMAT Score:
740
Post Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:46 am
Tedcornell,

Love the way you dissect the question,

But you are incorrect here.

Will wait for more replies before posting OA

_________________
Its better to burn out than to fade away

  • +1 Upvote Post
  • Quote
  • Flag

Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 116 topics
2 LUANDATO 68 topics
3 swerve 65 topics
4 ardz24 65 topics
5 Roland2rule 64 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

198 posts
2 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

181 posts
3 image description Jeff@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

168 posts
4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

134 posts
5 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

119 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts