Residents of city Y have more purchasing power than resident

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 164
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:34 pm
Location: Bangalore
GMAT Score:590

by iwill » Sat Aug 02, 2008 5:31 am
please post the OA

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 172
Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 11:21 am
Thanked: 1 times

by gmattester » Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:51 pm
IMO 'A'

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 401
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 9:21 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:1 members

by NSNguyen » Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:03 am
HI my airan,
what is the OA?
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:09 pm

by natalietong » Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:09 am
D doesn't sound right. purchasing more products doesn't mean spending more money, so it doesn't mean having more purchase power. I would choose C. lower tax and cheaper land account for the lower spend on food and house, as well as for a higher purchase power.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:37 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:1 members

by pranavc » Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:21 am
going with B. What is the OA?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:42 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by Stockmoose16 » Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:01 pm
This is a very tough question. I think the answer is D. C sounds right, but you can't infer that the reason they have more purchasing power is BECAUSE of lower taxes, etc. There are many reasons they could have more purchasing power.

What's the OA?

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:47 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
airan wrote:Residents of city Y have more purchasing power than residents of cities X and Z. At the same income levels, residents of city Y spend less for food and housing and can therefore purchase more products.

Which of the following inferences is best supported by the statements made above ?

A. Residents of City Y have the ability to purchase food and pay for the housing considerably less than the residents of City X and Z because food and housing cost less.

B. Residents of City Y do not need to buy as much food and rent/build as big of houses as residents of cities X and Z.

C. City Y has lower sales taxes and cheaper land to build property on, compared to the cities X and Z.
D. Residents of city Y do purchase more products than residents of cities X and Z.
E. Residents of city U pay more for the other expenses compared to residents of X and Z.

A -> We are nowhere told of the ABILITY to purchase food n pay for housing of the residents of City y

B -> Seems the right answer to me

c-> Well this might be the correct answer too. but not sure

D-> we do not know if they DO purchase. We only know that their Purchasing power is higher than the other 2 cities.

E -> If it is 'U' then this choice is is clearly out. If it is a typo and if it was supposed to be 'Y' then the reasoning is same as D


Please drop in the OA.
Please visit my blog Gmat Tips and Strategies

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 7:58 am

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 1:43 am
I would go for A as well. It seems the best and safest among the rest.