• Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep

Re: Please rate my AWA Essay. Thank a ton !!

This topic has 0 member replies
anuraggh2002 Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
04 Sep 2016
Posted:
5 messages
Test Date:
01/11/2016
Target GMAT Score:
740

Re: Please rate my AWA Essay. Thank a ton !!

Post Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:13 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    The following appeared in a memorandum sent by a vice-president of the Nadir Company to the company’s human resources department.

    “Nadir does not need to adopt the costly ‘family-friendly’ programs that have been proposed, such as part-time work, work at home, and job-sharing. When these programs were made available at the Summit Company, the leader in its industry, only a small percentage of employees participated in them. Rather than adversely affecting our profitability by offering these programs, we should concentrate on offering extensive training that will enable employees to increase their productivity.”

    Discuss how well reasoned . . . etc.


    In the preceding argument, the vice president proposes not to adopt the costly family friendly programs such as part-time work, work at home and job sharing because these programs have not been successful in the case of its competitor, but rather focus on offering extensive training, which will result in improved profitability for the company by improving employee productivity. Though the author's claim may well have some merit, the author presents a poorly reasoned argument, based on several questionable claims and assumptions, and based solely on the evidence that the author offers, we cannot accept his argument as valid.

    To begin with, the assumption that the family friendly measures will not work for the Nadir Company because they did not work for the Summit Company is flawed, as even though both the companies are in the same industry, they may be different from each other in many aspects. For instance, in case the number of employees having families and children in the Nadir Company is much higher than that in the Summit Company, the plan may well succeed fin the Nadir Company, although it failed in the Summit Company. To support his claim, the author needs to provide supporting data on the number and percentage of employees, who have families and children, for both the companies.

    Second, the author proposed to introduce extensive training without offering any additional support for its success. It is quite possible that extensive training may also not provide the required results. To strengthen his argument, the author needs to provide evidence about why extensive training will succeed in improving employee productivity.

    To sum, the argument presented above is unconvincing, and based on unsubstantiated assumptions and premises. We will have to reject the author's claim, unless the author presents additional supporting evidence to back his claim that the family program will not succeed in the Summit Company because it failed in the other company, and also why the extensive training program will succeed.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 lheiannie07 111 topics
    2 ardz24 64 topics
    3 LUANDATO 62 topics
    4 swerve 60 topics
    5 AAPL 57 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    160 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    130 posts
    3 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    122 posts
    4 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    122 posts
    5 image description Scott@TargetTestPrep

    Target Test Prep

    118 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts