• Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors

RC: extradition - Try it out

This topic has 3 member replies
beater Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
22 Apr 2008
Posted:
301 messages
Thanked:
2 times

RC: extradition - Try it out

Post Wed Jul 23, 2008 12:18 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    The refusal of some countries to extradite persons accused or convicted of terrorist act has focused attention on the problems caused by the political offense exception to extradition. Extradition is the process by which one country returns an accused or convicted person found within its borders to another country for trial or punishment. Under the political offense exception, the requested state may, if it considers the crime to be a "political offense," deny extradition to the requesting state.
    Protection of political offenses is a recent addition to the ancient practice of extradition. It is the result of two fundamental changes that occurred as European monarchies were replaced by representative governments. First, these governments began to reject what had been a primary intent of extradition, to expedite the return of political offenders, and instead sought to protect dissidents fleeing despotic regimes. Second, countries began to contend that they had no legal or moral duty to extradite offenders without specific agreements creating such obligations. As extradition laws subsequently developed through international treaties, the political offense exception gradually became an accepted principle among Western nations.
    There is no international consensus, however, as to what constitutes a political offense. For analytical purposes illegal political conduct has traditionally been divided into two categories. "Pure" political offenses are acts perpetrated directly against the government, such as treason and espionage. These crimes are generally recognized as nonextraditable, even if not expressly excluded from extradition by the applicable treaty. In contrast, common crimes, such as murder, assault, and robbery, are generally extraditable. However, there are some common crimes that are so inseparable from a political act that the entire offense is regarded as political. These crimes, which are called "relative" political offenses, are generally nonextraditable. Despite the widespread acceptance of these analytic constructs, the distinctions are more academic than meaningful. When it comes to real cases, there is no agreement about what transforms a common crime into a political offense and about whether terrorist acts fall within the protection of the exception. Most terrorists claim that their acts do fall under this protection.
    Nations of the world must now balance the competing needs of political freedom and international public order. It is time to reexamine the political offense exception, as international terrorism eradicates the critical distinctions between political offenses and nonpolitical crimes. The only rational and attainable objective of the exception is to protect the requested person against unfair treatment by the requesting country. The international community needs to find an alternative to the political offense exception that would protect the rights of requested persons and yet not offer terrorists immunity from criminal liability.


    12. The author would most likely agree that the political offense exception
    (A) has, in some cases, been stretched beyond intended use
    (B) has been used too infrequently to be evaluated
    (C) has been a modestly useful weapon again terrorism
    (D) has never met the objective for which it was originally established
    (E) has been of more academic than practical value to political dissidents

    13. Which one of the following, if true, would give the author most cause to reconsider her recommendation regarding the political offence exception (lines 62-66)?
    (A) More nations started refusing to extradite persons accused or convicted of terrorist acts.
    (B) More nations started extraditing persons accused or convicted of treason, espionage, and other similar crimes.
    (C) The nations of the world sharply decreased their use of the political offense exception protect persons accused of each of the various types of "pure" political offenses.
    (D) The nations of the world sharply decreased their use of the political offense exception to protect persons accused of each of the various types of "relative" political offenses.
    (E) The nations of the world started to disagree over the analytical distinction between "pure" political offenses and "relative" political offenses.

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    abhijeetsinghai Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    04 Jul 2008
    Posted:
    39 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    GMAT Score:
    700
    Post Thu Jul 24, 2008 2:30 pm
    12-A

    13-A

    Plz supply the correct answers n explanation.Thanx !!

    beater Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    22 Apr 2008
    Posted:
    301 messages
    Thanked:
    2 times
    Post Fri Jul 25, 2008 5:43 am
    OA = A/D

    lalitgmat Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    05 Jul 2007
    Posted:
    33 messages
    Post Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:59 pm
    A is correct as in case of Terrorists, some countries use unethical practice.
    D is correct as it weakens the conclusion of author as in last para.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 40 topics
    5 LUANDATO 32 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    141 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    107 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    106 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    104 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts