| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fk352 Just gettin' started!
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 3
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Philadelphia, PA Test Date: November 3, 2008 Target GMAT Score: 800
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:56 pm Post subject: Rare Coins problem |
|
|
Hi All, I took one look at the following problem and was completely stumped. I looked like a deer in headlights. Anyone want to give it a shot? I'll post the OA later:
Rare Coins
In a rare coin collection, one in six coins is gold. If 10 non-gold coins are subsequently traded for 10 gold coins, the ratio of gold coins to non-gold coins will be 1 to 4. Based on this information, how many gold coins are there now in this collection (after the trade)?
A) 50
B) 60
C) 180
D) 200
E) 300
[/u] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
dmateer25 Really wants to Beat The GMAT!
Joined: 06 Apr 2008 Posts: 103
Thanks given: 4 Thanked 9 times in 8 posts
Location: Pittsburgh, PA Target GMAT Score: 700
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ratio is
1 Gold : 5 Non Gold
Let X = Number of Gold Coins Originally
5X = Number of Non-Gold Originally
That means that:
(x+10)/(5x-10) = 1 Gold/ 4 Non Gold
4X + 40 = 5x -10
50 = X
Originally 50 gold coins.
So now there are 60 gold coins and 240 non gold coins (because of the ratio of 4 non gold for every 1 gold)
I go with B |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vishubn GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 01 Jun 2008 Posts: 368
Thanks given: 7 Thanked 18 times in 18 posts
Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Indeed.
i approached the problem in the same way as dmateer25 did.
60 is my call as well
Vishu
oa ???
Last edited by vishubn on Thu Oct 16, 2008 6:26 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
stop@800 GMAT Destroyer!

Joined: 13 Aug 2008 Posts: 852
Thanks given: 5 Thanked 30 times in 30 posts
Target GMAT Score: 790+
|
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
B for me too..
OA? _________________ "GMAT is tough, so what" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rohangupta83 GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 386
Thanks given: 2 Thanked 7 times in 7 posts
Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Total # of coins = 5X
gold coins = X
After trade
Total # of coins = 5X - 10
Gold coins = X + 10
New ratio
Coins: Gold = 1:4
Thus, 5X - 10 = 4X + 40
X = 50 (originally)
New # of gold coins = X + 10 or 50 + 10 = 60 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
msvmuthu Just gettin' started!
Joined: 27 Mar 2008 Posts: 13
Thanks given: 3 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Singapore Test Date: 21-oct-2008 Target GMAT Score: 700
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 12:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
let no of gold coins originally be x
and no of non gold coins originally be n
=> one in six coins is gold
no of gold coin originally = 1
no of non gold coins originally = total coins - gold coins = 6-1 =5
there fore forming an equation:
x/n = 1/5
n= 5x
5x-n =0 -> eq1
=>If 10 non-gold coins are subsequently traded for 10 gold coins
current no of gold coins = x+10
current no of non gold coins = n-10
=>the ratio of gold coins to non-gold coins will be 1 to 4
(x+10) / (n-10) = 1/4
4(x+10) = n-10
4x+40 = n-10
4x-n=-50
-4x+n=50 ->eq2
solving eq1 and eq2 will give
x=50
But please remember that x is no of gold coins before the trade.
After the trade 10 gold coins are added to the collection.
There fore no of gold coins in the current collection is 50 + 10 = 60 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
fk352 Just gettin' started!
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 Posts: 3
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Location: Philadelphia, PA Test Date: November 3, 2008 Target GMAT Score: 800
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
haha, sheesh. maybe the problem wasn't as hard as I thought.
Yes, OA is B, 60 gold coins.
Thanks everyone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
vishubn GMAT Destroyer!
Joined: 01 Jun 2008 Posts: 368
Thanks given: 7 Thanked 18 times in 18 posts
Location: Bangalore
|
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 6:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | haha, sheesh. maybe the problem wasn't as hard as I thought. |
.... Ya may be wording was bit on tricky side ...
thanks for the question though
Vishu |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|