take any two digit
Eg: 55 square= 1. 5 square 25 and take 5 and carry down 2.
2. then multiply 5*5*2 u will get 50 and then take the carry down value2 now the total is 50+2=52.
3. Again take 2 and carry down 5.
4.now do the square of first digit and add the carry down number i.e.5.
Now the Answer is 3025.
Quick way to calculate square root of large number?
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:28 am
- Location: Philippines
- Thanked: 2 times
Isn't much easier this way?kprat90 wrote:take any two digit
Eg: 55 square= 1. 5 square 25 and take 5 and carry down 2.
2. then multiply 5*5*2 u will get 50 and then take the carry down value2 now the total is 50+2=52.
3. Again take 2 and carry down 5.
4.now do the square of first digit and add the carry down number i.e.5.
Now the Answer is 3025.
In squaring a two-digit number ending in 5, simply put 25 as the last two digit (of your answer) and multiply the digit in the ten's decimal place by a number next to it higher by 1...
that is, 5 x 6 (6 is a number next to 5 higher by 1)= 30
= 30'25
Here's another example... squaring 85
_ _ ' 2 5 (as the last digit of your answer)
8 x 9 = 72
Answer: 72'25
Make things SAP (simple as possible)
- beat da gmat
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:12 am
- Followed by:1 members
a certain method for squaring of numbers exists
as in if i wantd to figure out da answer for 33^2,the ans can be found by 33^2=35^2-34*4
if i used the same method for 34^2 naturally it would be 35^2-34.5*4
but my answer is incorrect. Is this method appropriate??
as in if i wantd to figure out da answer for 33^2,the ans can be found by 33^2=35^2-34*4
if i used the same method for 34^2 naturally it would be 35^2-34.5*4
but my answer is incorrect. Is this method appropriate??
- beat da gmat
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2011 7:12 am
- Followed by:1 members
a certain method for squaring of numbers exists
as in if i wantd to figure out da answer for 33^2,the ans can be found by 33^2=35^2-34*4
if i used the same method for 34^2 naturally it would be 35^2-34.5*4
but my answer is incorrect. Is this method appropriate??
as in if i wantd to figure out da answer for 33^2,the ans can be found by 33^2=35^2-34*4
if i used the same method for 34^2 naturally it would be 35^2-34.5*4
but my answer is incorrect. Is this method appropriate??
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:28 am
- Location: Philippines
- Thanked: 2 times
35^2 = 12'25 (can be done mentally)beat da gmat wrote:a certain method for squaring of numbers exists
as in if i wantd to figure out da answer for 33^2,the ans can be found by 33^2=35^2-34*4
if i used the same method for 34^2 naturally it would be 35^2-34.5*4
but my answer is incorrect. Is this method appropriate??
but why the need to multiply 34 by 4?
The simplest way is by the use of this popular equation, (x+y)^2 - x^2 + 2xy + y^2
33^2 = 09'09 (Partial Square Value w/c is equivalent to x^2 + y^2)
30x3x2= 1 80 (Sub-product) w/c is equivalent to 2xy...
Total = 10'89
(of course with the conditions that x = 30 and y = 3)
w/ SSQ Method (Synthetic Squaring Method), the appropriate 'index squares' fall in their respective decimal places, such as...
34^2 = 09'16
3x4x2 = 2 4
Total= 11'56
Why complicate your self?
Make things SAP (simple as possible)
- flixblixclix
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:20 pm
- Followed by:1 members
we can find the sqare root by two methods
1)prime factorisation
2)Division method
PRIME FACTORISATION
Q)Find the square of 9801
3|9801
3|3267
3|1089
3|363
11|121
|11
prime factors are=3x3x3x3x11x11
make the pairs of aa
3x3x11=99
thus the square root of9801 is 99
IT IS A EASIEAR WAY TO FIND
to find square root of 9801 by division method
1) divide it into pairs (98)(01)
2) divide first pair with square of number and take that number as quotient and bring next pair with remainder 9 |(98)(01)| 9
______________________________ -81
_______________________________1701
now taking double of quotient divide again byng nearest number next to it such that by multiplying final number by number obtained the product is less than equal to dividend 189|1701|99
_____________________________1701
_____________________________0
this is somewhat difficult....
1)prime factorisation
2)Division method
PRIME FACTORISATION
Q)Find the square of 9801
3|9801
3|3267
3|1089
3|363
11|121
|11
prime factors are=3x3x3x3x11x11
make the pairs of aa
3x3x11=99
thus the square root of9801 is 99
IT IS A EASIEAR WAY TO FIND
to find square root of 9801 by division method
1) divide it into pairs (98)(01)
2) divide first pair with square of number and take that number as quotient and bring next pair with remainder 9 |(98)(01)| 9
______________________________ -81
_______________________________1701
now taking double of quotient divide again byng nearest number next to it such that by multiplying final number by number obtained the product is less than equal to dividend 189|1701|99
_____________________________1701
_____________________________0
this is somewhat difficult....
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:28 am
- Location: Philippines
- Thanked: 2 times
Sorry, I rather prefer the easier method of:flixblixclix wrote:we can find the sqare root by two methods
1)prime factorisation
2)Division method
PRIME FACTORISATION
Q)Find the square of 9801...
1) Determining the first two digits
2) Determining the last digit
With the condition: THE GIVEN NUMBER IS A PERFECT SQUARE
OK, let's assume 9801 is a perk (perfect square number)
1) the first digit is 98
2) the last digit is 1
There is a technique w/c I called "Ten-Square Complements" in which there are always a pair of single digit numbers, when added will give us a sum of 10 and which their 'index squares' end, with the same digit number, such:
1 + 9 = 10, square of 1 = 01 while square of 9 = 81
2 + 8 = 10, square of 2 = 04 while square of 8 = 64
3 + 7 = 10, square of 3 = 09 while square of 7 = 49
4 + 6 = 10, square of 4 = 16 while square of 6 = 36
(Except 0 and 5, which don't have a pair)
9801 is a 4 digit number,
1) Regroup by twos - 98'01
2) Consider the first two digit, 98
The nearest square but less than 98 is 81 and its equivalent square root value is 9
3) The last digit of 98'01 is, of course, 1
There is a pair of single digit numbers with squares ending in 1 and these are 1 and 9
4) So,we have two possible square roots 91 and 98 and only one of them is correct
To determine which of the two is the right answer, simply consider the first digit of the possible answers (91 or 98) and "add 1" (that is, 9 + 1 = 10) and multiply to the original digit (9)
9 x 10 = 90
Conditions:
1) If the product (90) is less than the first two digits of the given problem (98), consider the much higher value among the two possible answers (between 91 and 98, choose 98)
2) If the product (90) is greater than the first two digits of the given problem (98),(which is not true or contradicting, in this case), consider the much lower value among the two possible answers (between 91 and 98, choose 91)
In this case, 90 is less than 98, therefore, (with the assumption that 9801 is a perk), the right answer would be: 98
NOTE: To make condition 2 agreeable, the given problem must be = 8,281
...2) If the product (90) is greater than the first two digits of the given problem (82), consider the much lower value among the two possible answers (between 91 and 98, choose 91)
Both prime factorization and division method were both traditionals and we're familiar with them.
These "alternative methods", go beyond the traditionals, or simply stated as "breaking the conventional strict rules we learned in the class rooms"
Make things SAP (simple as possible)
- shaurya.lawcitizen
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:50 am
how would u noe the closest square number in a small amount of time
in my method i recommend prime factorization.....
for example to find √625
5|625
5|125
5|25
5|5
|1
Now find √5*5*5*5 = 5*5 = 25
hope dat ws easy..☺
---------------------------------------------
QED (Quite Easily Done)
in my method i recommend prime factorization.....
for example to find √625
5|625
5|125
5|25
5|5
|1
Now find √5*5*5*5 = 5*5 = 25
hope dat ws easy..☺
---------------------------------------------
QED (Quite Easily Done)
- shaurya.lawcitizen
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:50 am
to find 55² we can split the numbers as 5|5, (units place)²
multiply the tens digit by n*(n+1)
that is, 5 x 6 (6 is a number next to 5 higher by 1)= 30
= 30'25
multiply the tens digit by n*(n+1)
that is, 5 x 6 (6 is a number next to 5 higher by 1)= 30
= 30'25
Last edited by shaurya.lawcitizen on Thu Nov 10, 2011 8:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
- shaurya.lawcitizen
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 7:50 am
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 1:28 am
- Location: Philippines
- Thanked: 2 times
Try MSM-3 Method (Please read this thread from the beginning and you'll come up w/ the topic about MSM-3). This avoid repeating the explanations about MSM-3 or search in google " Square Root: A Digit Per Digit Approach by F. Mendoza, it would help you a lot). Thanksshaurya.lawcitizen wrote:How 2 find √39601 .............?? tell a quicker method plzzzzzzzz..........
Make things SAP (simple as possible)