• Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep

Q11-OG13th CR

This topic has 4 expert replies and 5 member replies
rupalikunmun123 Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
29 May 2012
Posted:
4 messages

Q11-OG13th CR

Post Fri Aug 17, 2012 11:04 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    The Maxilux car company's design for its new luxury model, the Max 100, included a special design for the tires that was intended to complement the model's image. The winning bid for supplying these tires was submitted by Rubco. Analysts concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's costs on the tires, but Rubco executives claim that winning the bid will actually make a profit for the company.

    Which of the following, if true, most strongly justifies the claim made by Rubco's executives?

    (A) In any Maxilux model, the spare tire is exactly the same make and model as the tires that are mounted on the wheels.

    (B) Rubco holds exclusive contracts to supply Maxilux with the tires for a number of other models made by Maxilux.

    (C) The production facilities for the Max 100 and those for the tires to be supplied by Rubco are located very near each other.

    (D) When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.

    (E) When Maxilux awarded the tire contract to Rubco, the only criterion on which Rubco's bid was clearly ahead of its competitors' bids was price.


    1)Can anyone please explain me why we are eliminating B,C and D options?

    Option B)As per my understanding we are eliminating B as it talks about the other models of Maxilux company but our concern is how Rubco makes profit on the winning bid for Max 100 ........Please let me know if my understanding is correct on this answer?

    Option C talks about less production cost so it should help Rubco in earning profits. Why are we eliminating this option?

    Please explain why D is correct?

    2)One more question is that in the passage it is mentioned that the Analyst concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's cost on tires.Is this a premise/fact ?Do we have to consider this as a fact? Can we attack what analyst concluded?

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    ssidda01 Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    10 Nov 2010
    Posted:
    15 messages
    Thanked:
    1 times
    Post Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:57 pm
    Looking carefully at the conclusion we can summarize that in spite of Rubco's bid only covering up the cost of the tires the company will make profits. Rubco will not make a profit immediately but in the future it will through some other source. We need to identify this and choice D clearly states that. Tires eventually wear out and the cars need to buy the same designed tires from Rubco. More sales more money.

    You are absolutely right about choice B as that does not lead us to identify how Rubco will make profit. Choice C is also incorrect because the statement
    Quote:
    Analysts concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's costs on the tires
    clearly states that the money they receive will almost even out with the costs for the tires. This includes the travel charges, material, labor etc. Hence choice C does not fit our requirement.

    The above quote should be considered as a fact in our analysis.

    Post Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:41 pm
    rupalikunmun123 wrote:
    The Maxilux car company's design for its new luxury model, the Max 100, included a special design for the tires that was intended to complement the model's image. The winning bid for supplying these tires was submitted by Rubco. Analysts concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's costs on the tires, but Rubco executives claim that winning the bid will actually make a profit for the company.

    Which of the following, if true, most strongly justifies the claim made by Rubco's executives?

    (A) In any Maxilux model, the spare tire is exactly the same make and model as the tires that are mounted on the wheels.

    (B) Rubco holds exclusive contracts to supply Maxilux with the tires for a number of other models made by Maxilux.

    (C) The production facilities for the Max 100 and those for the tires to be supplied by Rubco are located very near each other.

    (D) When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.

    (E) When Maxilux awarded the tire contract to Rubco, the only criterion on which Rubco's bid was clearly ahead of its competitors' bids was price.


    1)Can anyone please explain me why we are eliminating B,C and D options?

    Option B)As per my understanding we are eliminating B as it talks about the other models of Maxilux company but our concern is how Rubco makes profit on the winning bid for Max 100 ........Please let me know if my understanding is correct on this answer?

    Option C talks about less production cost so it should help Rubco in earning profits. Why are we eliminating this option?

    Please explain why D is correct?

    2)One more question is that in the passage it is mentioned that the Analyst concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's cost on tires.Is this a premise/fact ?Do we have to consider this as a fact? Can we attack what analyst concluded?
    Premise: The bid to supply tires for the Max 100 will just cover Rubco's costs.
    Conclusion: As a result of winning the bid, Rubco will make a profit.
    For the conclusion to be valid, what must be true?
    As a result of winning the bid, Rubco must be able to make a profit in SOME OTHER WAY.

    Answer choice D: When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.
    This answer choice shows how Rubco will make a profit: when purchasers of the Max 100 need a new tire, they will buy the specially-designed tire made by Rubco.

    The correct answer is D.

    Reasons to eliminate:

    A: The spare tire is irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that supplying tires for the Max 100 will not yield a profit.

    B: Since these contracts are already held by Rubco, they are not affected by the bid to supply tires for the Max 100.

    C: How the tires are produced is irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that supplying tires for the Max 100 will not yield a profit.

    E: Irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that Rubco supplied the winning bid. The correct answer must show how -- as a RESULT of winning the bid -- Rubco will realize a profit.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    hjafferi Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
    Joined
    19 Aug 2012
    Posted:
    83 messages
    Post Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:48 pm
    IMO D

    davidfrank Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
    Joined
    27 Jun 2010
    Posted:
    13 messages
    Post Fri May 10, 2013 3:01 am
    I thought that we could never dispute conclusion. My question is also around option c. If the two plants are located close to each other, then my cost of production would come down and thus profit increases. Please tell me why is D a stronger answer. On the other hand if I look at D then even though the tires are supplied new every time a part worns out, the cost of the tyres will remain the same irrespective of the number sold. Please clarify
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    rupalikunmun123 wrote:
    The Maxilux car company's design for its new luxury model, the Max 100, included a special design for the tires that was intended to complement the model's image. The winning bid for supplying these tires was submitted by Rubco. Analysts concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's costs on the tires, but Rubco executives claim that winning the bid will actually make a profit for the company.

    Which of the following, if true, most strongly justifies the claim made by Rubco's executives?

    (A) In any Maxilux model, the spare tire is exactly the same make and model as the tires that are mounted on the wheels.

    (B) Rubco holds exclusive contracts to supply Maxilux with the tires for a number of other models made by Maxilux.

    (C) The production facilities for the Max 100 and those for the tires to be supplied by Rubco are located very near each other.

    (D) When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.

    (E) When Maxilux awarded the tire contract to Rubco, the only criterion on which Rubco's bid was clearly ahead of its competitors' bids was price.


    1)Can anyone please explain me why we are eliminating B,C and D options?

    Option B)As per my understanding we are eliminating B as it talks about the other models of Maxilux company but our concern is how Rubco makes profit on the winning bid for Max 100 ........Please let me know if my understanding is correct on this answer?

    Option C talks about less production cost so it should help Rubco in earning profits. Why are we eliminating this option?

    Please explain why D is correct?

    2)One more question is that in the passage it is mentioned that the Analyst concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's cost on tires.Is this a premise/fact ?Do we have to consider this as a fact? Can we attack what analyst concluded?
    Premise: The bid to supply tires for the Max 100 will just cover Rubco's costs.
    Conclusion: As a result of winning the bid, Rubco will make a profit.
    For the conclusion to be valid, what must be true?
    As a result of winning the bid, Rubco must be able to make a profit in SOME OTHER WAY.

    Answer choice D: When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.
    This answer choice shows how Rubco will make a profit: when purchasers of the Max 100 need a new tire, they will buy the specially-designed tire made by Rubco.

    The correct answer is D.

    Reasons to eliminate:

    A: The spare tire is irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that supplying tires for the Max 100 will not yield a profit.

    B: Since these contracts are already held by Rubco, they are not affected by the bid to supply tires for the Max 100.

    C: How the tires are produced is irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that supplying tires for the Max 100 will not yield a profit.

    E: Irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that Rubco supplied the winning bid. The correct answer must show how -- as a RESULT of winning the bid -- Rubco will realize a profit.

    richachampion Legendary Member
    Joined
    21 Jul 2015
    Posted:
    678 messages
    Followed by:
    24 members
    Thanked:
    31 times
    Test Date:
    ∞ →
    Target GMAT Score:
    760
    GMAT Score:
    740
    Post Tue May 31, 2016 9:43 pm
    GMATGuruNY wrote:
    rupalikunmun123 wrote:
    The Maxilux car company's design for its new luxury model, the Max 100, included a special design for the tires that was intended to complement the model's image. The winning bid for supplying these tires was submitted by Rubco. Analysts concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's costs on the tires, but Rubco executives claim that winning the bid will actually make a profit for the company.

    Which of the following, if true, most strongly justifies the claim made by Rubco's executives?

    (A) In any Maxilux model, the spare tire is exactly the same make and model as the tires that are mounted on the wheels.

    (B) Rubco holds exclusive contracts to supply Maxilux with the tires for a number of other models made by Maxilux.

    (C) The production facilities for the Max 100 and those for the tires to be supplied by Rubco are located very near each other.

    (D) When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.

    (E) When Maxilux awarded the tire contract to Rubco, the only criterion on which Rubco's bid was clearly ahead of its competitors' bids was price.


    1)Can anyone please explain me why we are eliminating B,C and D options?

    Option B)As per my understanding we are eliminating B as it talks about the other models of Maxilux company but our concern is how Rubco makes profit on the winning bid for Max 100 ........Please let me know if my understanding is correct on this answer?

    Option C talks about less production cost so it should help Rubco in earning profits. Why are we eliminating this option?

    Please explain why D is correct?

    2)One more question is that in the passage it is mentioned that the Analyst concluded that the bid would only just cover Rubco's cost on tires.Is this a premise/fact ?Do we have to consider this as a fact? Can we attack what analyst concluded?
    Premise: The bid to supply tires for the Max 100 will just cover Rubco's costs.
    Conclusion: As a result of winning the bid, Rubco will make a profit.
    For the conclusion to be valid, what must be true?
    As a result of winning the bid, Rubco must be able to make a profit in SOME OTHER WAY.

    Answer choice D: When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.
    This answer choice shows how Rubco will make a profit: when purchasers of the Max 100 need a new tire, they will buy the specially-designed tire made by Rubco.

    The correct answer is D.

    Reasons to eliminate:

    A: The spare tire is irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that supplying tires for the Max 100 will not yield a profit.

    B: Since these contracts are already held by Rubco, they are not affected by the bid to supply tires for the Max 100.

    C: How the tires are produced is irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that supplying tires for the Max 100 will not yield a profit.

    E: Irrelevant. It is given as a PREMISE -- as a FACT not in dispute -- that Rubco supplied the winning bid. The correct answer must show how -- as a RESULT of winning the bid -- Rubco will realize a profit.
    I have a disagreement over this.

    Profit = Revenue - Cost

    If we know the composition of one particle of a soil than me know the whole soil. Similarly if know the cost of 1 Tyre then we know the cost of 1 million tires too.

    As per the premise
    Profit = 0
    Because revenue = cost


    Replacement Tyre is also a tyre with the same manufacturing cost and holds the same relationship -

    Profit = Revenue - Cost = 0

    Post Wed Jun 01, 2016 3:00 am
    davidfrank wrote:
    I thought that we could never dispute conclusion. My question is also around option c. If the two plants are located close to each other, then my cost of production would come down and thus profit increases.
    C: The production facilities for the Max 100 and those for the tires to be supplied by Rubco are located very near each other.
    The location of the two facilities is irrelevant, since it is given as a PREMISE that the bid would only just cover Rubco's costs.
    A premise is a FACT.
    It cannot be disputed.
    The correct answer choice cannot dispute this premise by claiming that the bid would MORE THAN COVER Rubco's costs.
    Rather, the correct answer choice must show how Rubco will make a profit DESPITE the high cost of producing the tires.

    Quote:
    Please tell me why is D a stronger answer. On the other hand if I look at D then even though the tires are supplied new every time a part worns out, the cost of the tyres will remain the same irrespective of the number sold. Please clarify
    D: When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.
    Here, there is a market for the tires BEYOND those supplied to Maxilux in the original bid.
    Implication:
    Rubco can charge a high price for each replacement tire, enabling the company to make a profit.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.
    Post Wed Jun 01, 2016 3:05 am
    richachampion wrote:
    Replacement Tyre is also a tyre with the same manufacturing cost and holds the same relationship -

    Profit = Revenue - Cost = 0
    The portion in red is not necessarily true.
    As noted in my post just above, Rubco can charge a high price for each replacement tire, leading to an INCREASE IN REVENUES and enabling the company to make a profit.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Thanked by: ritzzzr
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.

    Top Member

    rsarashi Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
    Joined
    24 Dec 2016
    Posted:
    182 messages
    Followed by:
    2 members
    Thanked:
    4 times
    Most Conversational Member
    Post Wed Jun 14, 2017 10:00 am
    Quote:
    Premise: The bid to supply tires for the Max 100 will just cover Rubco's costs.
    Conclusion: As a result of winning the bid, Rubco will make a profit.
    For the conclusion to be valid, what must be true?
    As a result of winning the bid, Rubco must be able to make a profit in SOME OTHER WAY.

    Answer choice D: When people who have purchased a carefully designed luxury automobile need to replace a worn part of it, they almost invariably replace it with a part of exactly the same make and type.
    This answer choice shows how Rubco will make a profit: when purchasers of the Max 100 need a new tire, they will buy the specially-designed tire made by Rubco.

    The correct answer is D.

    Hi GMATGuruNY ,

    This is a inference question and inference question can also be solved by negating method.

    Can you please explain this by negation method?

    Please explain.

    Thanks

    Post Wed Jun 14, 2017 10:30 am
    rsarashi wrote:
    Hi GMATGuruNY ,

    This is a inference question and inference question can also be solved by negating method.

    Can you please explain this by negation method?

    Please explain.

    Thanks
    This is not an inference CR but a STRENGTHEN CR.
    According to the question stem, the correct answer choice must justify the claim that winning the bid will actually make a profit for the company.
    In other words, the correct answer choice must STRENGTHEN the conclusion in blue.
    The negation test is not applicable to strengthen CRs.

    _________________
    Mitch Hunt
    GMAT Private Tutor
    GMATGuruNY@gmail.com
    If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Thank" icon.
    Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance.
    For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com.

    Thanked by: rsarashi
    Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now.

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 Vincen 152 topics
    2 lheiannie07 61 topics
    3 Roland2rule 49 topics
    4 ardz24 40 topics
    5 LUANDATO 32 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    141 posts
    2 image description EconomistGMATTutor

    The Economist GMAT Tutor

    107 posts
    3 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    106 posts
    4 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

    EMPOWERgmat

    104 posts
    5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

    Veritas Prep

    76 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts