• Economist Test Prep
    Free Trial & Practice Exam
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Economist Test Prep
  • Magoosh
    Magoosh
    Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Magoosh
  • e-gmat Exclusive Offer
    Get 300+ Practice Questions
    25 Video lessons and 6 Webinars for FREE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    e-gmat Exclusive Offer
  • Veritas Prep
    Free Veritas GMAT Class
    Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Veritas Prep
  • EMPOWERgmat Slider
    1 Hour Free
    BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    EMPOWERgmat Slider
  • Target Test Prep
    5-Day Free Trial
    5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Target Test Prep
  • PrepScholar GMAT
    5 Day FREE Trial
    Study Smarter, Not Harder

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    PrepScholar GMAT
  • Varsity Tutors
    Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
    Register now and save up to $200

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Varsity Tutors
  • Kaplan Test Prep
    Free Practice Test & Review
    How would you score if you took the GMAT

    Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

    MORE DETAILS
    Kaplan Test Prep

Problem with IR from OG 13

This topic has 1 expert reply and 4 member replies
undefeated Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
05 Sep 2011
Posted:
2 messages

Problem with IR from OG 13

Post Tue Aug 14, 2012 4:40 pm
Hi,

I was practicing IR from Willey.com (the access came with OG 13), when I came across this problem. At the first glance, this seemed pretty easy. But I selected Inferable for 7B, which is wrong.

In my view, I can obviously infer from the given data that the given statement in 7B is wrong (in fact, this should be overpriced). So can't I say this is reasonably inferable from the given data? What's wrong with my reasoning?

Thanks for your help.
Attachments

This post contains an attachment. You must be logged in to download/view this file. Please login or register as a user.

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
alex.gellatly Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
16 Nov 2011
Posted:
435 messages
Followed by:
16 members
Thanked:
48 times
Post Mon Aug 27, 2012 11:21 pm
I would like to help... but I can't read the attachment clearly

_________________
A useful website I found that has every quant OG video explanation:

http://www.beatthegmat.com/useful-website-with-og-video-explanations-t112985.html#475231

bynddrvn Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
16 Apr 2009
Posted:
33 messages
Thanked:
2 times
Test Date:
Summer 2015
Target GMAT Score:
700
Post Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:21 am
I had trouble with this case as well, but I was hammered on the NEXT question where board prestige is apparently inferable?

For question 7A I agree with OG13 that this is NOT inferable as there are several factors that effect the IPO price.

What I don't understand is that on question 8A why you can infer the prestige of the board on a case by case basis. If you can infer board prestige on an individual basis, wouldn't this hold for most cases in the general population?
Attachments

This post contains an attachment. You must be logged in to download/view this file. Please login or register as a user.

tanviet Legendary Member Default Avatar
Joined
20 May 2008
Posted:
1404 messages
Followed by:
2 members
Thanked:
18 times
Post Wed Oct 03, 2012 6:55 pm
I see you do right on 7B. 7B should be "not inferable
I am confuse too.

GMAT/MBA Expert

Whitney Garner GMAT Instructor
Joined
21 Sep 2010
Posted:
273 messages
Followed by:
73 members
Thanked:
154 times
GMAT Score:
770
Post Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:38 pm
Hi undefeated (and everyone else following this thread)!

I thought I would start by re-posting the IR prompt in full (both tabs together) so people can try these problems out on their own!

TABS:


QUESTIONS:

#7:

#8:

#9:


Okay, let's take a read and see what we can generally understand from the short paragraph and table. The following are the notes I jotted down from each tab - just something quick to make sure I had a clear understanding of what was offered, and the I could sit back and try to connect the dots...

"Kenyan IPO Pricing" Tab


"Kenyan IPOs, 1994-2008" Tab


Can I put it together??
Okay, I see a couple of patterns so I just want to make sure I'm clear in my understanding:

- I "hear" that basically all of the Kenyan companies started the bidding WAY too low on their IPOs (an average of 50% too low). But I only "see" (from the table) 3 companies that were over 50% (it is a couple of nasty outliers that are really driving this number).

- I also understand that during this study they tried to figure out if any factors about the companies explained why they set their initial prices where they did. So they assumed that bigger and older firms, with more prestige and with excited investors would start their prices out higher than smaller, newer, less prestigious firms with less excited investors. But that isn't what they found...
...(a) The size and age of the firm was pretty unrelated to initial price
...(b) if investors were MORE interested, the price actually started out LOWER
...(C) if the board was MORE prestigious, the price actually started out LOWER

**NOTE**
It is totally okay that we have spent a bit more time here than on other prompts. Remember that MSR (Multi-Source Reasoning = the ones with the tabs) will typically have 3 questions that accompany it so we should expect to have 7.5 minutes to budget (2.5 min per question).

Now we're ready for the questions!

7A: "IPOs of firms with prestigious boards were more likely to be underpriced than those of other firms."
We know from the reading that IPOs with prestigious boards were more likely to be LOWER-priced than those of other firms, but we do NOT know that they are necessarily UNDER-priced!
NOT Inferable

7B: "Firestone East Africa set its IPO price slightly lower than it should have."
It is clear that Firestone actually set its IPO price TOO HIGH so definitely not slightly LOWER than it should have! Now, make sure you are clear about what it means to be inferable. If something is "inferable" then it can be shown to be TRUE given the information in the passage. We CANNOT show this statement to be true (it is clearly false) so we cannot infer it!
NOT Inferable

7C: "At least one of the firms examined by the researchers did not have an underpriced IPO"
We can actually show that 2 firms (Mumias Sugar & Firestone East Africa) did NOT have underpriced IPOs (the first was priced perfectly with closing prices and the second was overpriced). Therefore we can show that this statement is TRUE based on the information from the passage.
Inferable


8A: "The board of Safaricom was likely considered more prestigious than that of Co-Operative Bank at the time of their IPOs"
What do we know about prestige - well from our notes we know that what the researchers found was that the more prestige, the LOWER the IPO price. Does this match what this question is saying? Safaricom had an IP) of 5 while Co-Operative Bank had a price of 9.50. According to what we read, since Safaricom was cheaper, it was probably considered "more" prestigious.
SUPPORTED

8B: "Kenya Re and Eveready were approximately the same size firms at the time of their IPOs"
What did we read about the size of the firm as it related to the IPO - oh, they were NOT correlated, so we cannot tell anything about trends in firm size from relative IPOs!!
NOT Supported

8C: "When their IPO prices were set, investor sentiment was likely more favorable toward Kengen than toward Scangroup or Eveready"
What did we read about investor sentiment - OH, it was negatively correlated to IPO. So that means the MORE favorable, the LOWER the price. Let's check the table. Kengen was set at 11.90, Scangroup at 10.45 and Eveready at 9.50. This means that Kengen had a HIGHER price than either of the others so would be expected to have a LESS favorable investor sentiment. This is the opposite of what the statement gives.
NOT Supportable


9: "The discussion of the researchers' study of Kenyan IPOs refers to "board prestige" primarily to..."
Well, they talk about it as they try to figure out what causes different companies to set their IPO prices at different amounts. And it was one of the potential "variables" that went in the exact opposite direction of causation compared to what was expected. Check the answer choices...

(A) nope - it doesn't explain anything about sentiment, they were just in a list together
(B) hmmm, maybe but it doesn't say anything about accuracy of the variables
(C) OH, this one looks like what we just summarized
(D) what?? no, this is never related to investor interest (same issue as choice A)
(E) hmmm, now this is talking about the negative correlation to the IPO price, BUT did they mention it to intentionally demonstrate that fact? not really, they seemed to find it "surprising"

That means that we really can trust CHOICE (C) as the best choice!

SO SUPER long post, but what can we take from it - for MSR problems, take your time doing the following:

(1) Get a clear understanding of ALL tabs, both individually as well as how they connect (the connections are usually where most of the questions will live)

(2) Take a moment to make sure that you clearly understand what the Either/Or questions are asking you to evaluate (what does it mean to be "Inferable" or "Supported")

Hope this helps!
Smile
Whit

_________________
Whitney Garner
GMAT Instructor & Instructor Developer
Manhattan Prep

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Math is a lot like love - a simple idea that can easily get complicated Smile

Thanked by: bynddrvn
Free Manhattan Prep online events - The first class of every online Manhattan Prep course is free. Classes start every week.
bynddrvn Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Default Avatar
Joined
16 Apr 2009
Posted:
33 messages
Thanked:
2 times
Test Date:
Summer 2015
Target GMAT Score:
700
Post Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:53 am
Thank you for clearly explaining your thought process to get to the correct answers.

Best Conversation Starters

1 Vincen 180 topics
2 lheiannie07 61 topics
3 Roland2rule 61 topics
4 ardz24 40 topics
5 VJesus12 14 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

Most Active Experts

1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

160 posts
2 image description Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

102 posts
3 image description GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

99 posts
4 image description Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

86 posts
5 image description Matt@VeritasPrep

Veritas Prep

80 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts