| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ritula Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 10 Aug 2008 Posts: 81
Thanks given: 4 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Test Date: 27th September'2008 Target GMAT Score: 740
|
Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2008 3:06 am Post subject: probability |
|
|
Mary and Joe are to throw three dice each. The score is the sum of points on all three dice. If Mary scores 10 in her attempt what is the probability that Joe will outscore Mary in his?
Ans: 32/64 _________________ Philosophers have interpreted world in various ways, the point is to change it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
sid1979 Just gettin' started!
Joined: 02 Sep 2008 Posts: 9
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 1 times in 1 posts
|
Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
I am trying to solve the problem but not sure whether i am correct or not. Also it is not matching with your answer. But my way is very time consuming also. Basically the question is asking how many triplets are there whose sum is > 10. Then only Joe will win. So what i found is how many ways we can score 10. Then probabiltiy of scoring >10 will be 1-p(scoring <=10). So the following is the list of triplets which will add up to 10.
163,136,154,145,262,226,254,245,244,361,316,352,325,343,334,451,415,442,424,433,541,514,532,523,631,613,622. So it comes out to be 27 cases. So Probabibilty of Joe winning is 1-27/216 = 61/72. Note 216 is the total no of cases if we throw 3 dice. (6*6*6). Please let me know my approach. But in the real test if there is no other approach for this problem then better to guess & move ahead.
Sid. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chase4meg Rising GMAT Star
Joined: 14 Sep 2008 Posts: 48
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
Target GMAT Score: 750
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can any of the moderators/instructors help?
Thanks! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ian Stewart GMAT Instructor

Joined: 02 Jun 2008 Posts: 862
Thanks given: 2 Thanked 166 times in 153 posts
Location: London GMAT Score: 780
|
Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Note that an 'average' roll on one die is 3.5, so the average sum on three dice is 3*3.5 = 10.5. So the question is asking for the probability that you roll an 'above average' sum (11 or greater). The probability of an 'above average' sum when you roll dice is equal to the probability of a 'below average' sum; that is, the probability is 1/2.
I have no idea why they've written "32/64" instead of 1/2 as the correct answer; even if you do the calculation the long way (case by case), you won't get 64 in the denominator. _________________ co-founder, www.gmatix.com
-GMAT blogs, free international directory of GMAT tutors and MBA Admissions Consultants, and more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
forgetneoiamtheone Just gettin' started!
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Posts: 11
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sum can range from 3 to 18,
So no. of possibilties=16
number of possibilties greater than 10= (18-11)+1=8
so, prob=1/2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
Ian Stewart GMAT Instructor

Joined: 02 Jun 2008 Posts: 862
Thanks given: 2 Thanked 166 times in 153 posts
Location: London GMAT Score: 780
|
Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| forgetneoiamtheone wrote: | sum can range from 3 to 18,
So no. of possibilties=16
number of possibilties greater than 10= (18-11)+1=8
so, prob=1/2. |
Unfortunately things aren't so simple. The outcomes are not equally likely- you are much more likely to have a sum of 10 than to have a sum of 3, for example. By the logic above, I imagine you might conclude that the probability is 1/16 that you will get a sum of 3, but it's not; to get a sum of 3, you need to roll a 1 on each die, so the probability is (1/6)*(1/6)*(1/6) = 1/216. _________________ co-founder, www.gmatix.com
-GMAT blogs, free international directory of GMAT tutors and MBA Admissions Consultants, and more... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
forgetneoiamtheone Just gettin' started!
Joined: 14 Apr 2008 Posts: 11
Thanks given: 0 Thanked 0 times in 0 posts
|
Posted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Ian for pointing out the flawed assumption.
The likelihood of each individual outcome didnt cross my mind.
Luckily, the symmetery of the distribution of outcomes around mean(the logic u used above) turned out to be saviour.
p[3]=p[18]
p[4]=p[17]
..and so on
therefore, p(3)+..+p(10)= p(11)+...p[18]=1/2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
|
"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.
|
|