• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Award-winning private GMAT tutoring
Register now and save up to \$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Magoosh
Study with Magoosh GMAT prep

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

## Princeton Verbal1 Q16

tagged by:

This topic has 1 member reply
sandeep_chhabra Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Joined
01 Feb 2008
Posted:
73 messages
Followed by:
1 members
Thanked:
1 times
Test Date:
22nd May 2008
Target GMAT Score:
650

#### Princeton Verbal1 Q16

Sun May 11, 2008 12:41 am
Elapsed Time: 00:00
• Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
An explaination on this would be appriciated.

thanks
Attachments

Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
Ur_Sky Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Joined
12 May 2008
Posted:
13 messages
Mon May 12, 2008 6:05 pm
Hi,
I see it like this:

Part 1.- From the beginning of the argument you can state that people in general tend to strongly believe that an event X will happen to them if they are in frequent contact with proofs of this event X happening.
Part 2.- As a supporting idea you read that not only more lotteries have been stablished, but also the advertising of lottery winners has increased. Why could this be taken as a supporting idea?. Because if people need to see lots of proofs of an event that they would like to believe in (in this case to be a lottery winner), it is logical to asume that it would be a good idea to publish a picture of the winners on every media that you can in order to atract more consumers.

With this first info, we go to the choices:
1.- This idea could be part of the argument, but not the conclusion. Remember that the main point we are talking about is the people´s judgements, not what those who run lotteries want.

3.- This is OK. Why?. Because it relates the two ideas stated in the text: people tend to judge that an event will happen to them if they see many proofs of this event happening, so I see lots of ads with lottery winners and I judge (and believe) that I will be one of them overestimating the real probabilities of winning (maybe one out of thousands).

4.- Irrelevant idea. We aren´t talking about taking right or wrong decisions.

5.-This seems to be a good answer. The problem is (like in choice 1), that it refers to the specific case of lottery businness, and remember that the main point is about people´s judgements in general. Lotteries are just an example to distract you.

Hope this could help

### Best Conversation Starters

1 lheiannie07 116 topics
2 ardz24 64 topics
3 swerve 63 topics
4 LUANDATO 62 topics
5 M7MBA 57 topics
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

### Most Active Experts

1 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

170 posts
2 EconomistGMATTutor

The Economist GMAT Tutor

129 posts
3 Rich.C@EMPOWERgma...

EMPOWERgmat

122 posts
4 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

121 posts
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

118 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts