Reading Comprehension

A majority taken collectively may be regarded as a being whose opinions and, most frequently, whose interests are opposed to those of another being, which is styled a minority. If it is admitted that a man possessing absolute power may misuse that power by wronging his adversaries, why should a majority not be liable to the same reproach? Men are not apt to change their characters by agglomeration; nor does their patience in the presence of obstacles increase with the consciousness of their strength. For these reasons we should not willingly invest any group of our fellows with that unlimited authority which we should refuse to any individual.
One social power must always predominate over others, but liberty is endangered when this power is checked by no obstacles which may retard its course and force it to moderate its own vehemence. Unlimited power is in itself a bad and dangerous thing, and no power on earth is so worthy of honor for itself or of reverential obedience to the rights which it represents that we should admit its uncontrolled and all-predominant authority. When the right and means of absolute command are conferred on a people or a king, on an aristocracy or a democracy, a monarchy or a republic, there has been implanted the germ of tyranny.
The main evil of the present democratic institutions of the United States does not arise, as is often asserted in Europe, from their weakness, but from their overpowering strength; the excessive liberty which reigns in that country is not so alarming as is the very inadequate security which exists against tyranny.
When an individual or a party is wronged in the United States, to whom can he apply for redress? If to the public opinion, public opinion constitutes the majority; if to the legislature, it represents the majority and implicitly obeys its injunctions; if to the executive power, it is appointed by the majority and remains a passive tool in its hands; the public troops consist of the majority under arms; the jury is the majority invested with the right of hearing judicial cases, and in certain states even the judges are elected by the majority. However iniquitous or absurd the evil complained about, no sure barrier is established to defend against it.

In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) challenging a commonly held belief
(B) contrasting two opposing views
(C) advocating a course of action
(D) reconciling an apparent conflict
(E) proposing a solution to an unrecognized problem

The author's treatment of the topic of the passage can best be described as
(A) ironic
(B) neutral
(C) logical
(D) irreverent
(E) diffident

My pick:

1 -> A
2 -> E

I think the author is trying to advocate a course of action.

Read the last sentence of the first paragraph.

IMO C.

OA pls????

IMO
1. A
2. A (I cant seem to find a fault with C)

Tone of the author : Positive - X ; Neutral - X; Negative - Yes

In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) challenging a commonly held belief - The only answer choice that reflects the tone of the author. Negative.
(B) contrasting two opposing views - Where is the second view in the passage?
(C) advocating a course of action - No course of action is advocated here
(D) reconciling an apparent conflict - Author has not reconciled any conflict
(E) proposing a solution to an unrecognized problem - No solution is proposed in the passage

So, A.

The author's treatment of the topic of the passage can best be described as
(A) ironic - Yes
(B) neutral - No
(C) logical - Could be a possiblility
(D) irreverent - Not at all
(E) diffident - diffident means shy because of lack of self confidence. That is not at all reflected in the passage.

So, A. But could be C as well. Both are extremely close

What is the Source.

Please post OA along with the questions. I'v noticed very few Experts helping out on posts which do not mention the OA.

OAs are
A n C...
How to solve 2nd q?