RBBmba@2014 wrote:DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:Hi Dave,
Actually in the Qs Pack CR# 1283, I found Option D as: Nonpartisan auditors were President's friends.
If an argument stipulated that the auditors were nonpartisan and an answer choice asserted that, in fact, they weren't non-partisan, that answer could not be correct.
Thanks for confirming Dave!
However, could you please share your quick thoughts on my FOLLOWING analysis of this VERSION of
Option D (as it appears in this thread):
The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the president's party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
Option D (in BLUE) implies any of the two -
The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the president's party were generally LESS expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties. So, it seems to STRENGTHEN the CONCLUSION.
OR
The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the president's party were generally AS expensive AS the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties. So, it seems to WEAKEN the CONCLUSION.
Therefore, any answer choice that attempts to STRENGTHEN the CONCLUSION at one hand and on the other hand attempts to WEAKEN the CONCLUSION, will definitely be a WRONG Option.
Am I correct ?
I'd argue that neither has much an impact on the conclusion. According to the non-partisan analysis, all the canceled projects were too expensive to justify continuing, right? If you have an ironclad rule stipulating that anything over-budget is going to be canceled (we don't know that they had this rule, but it's useful for illustrative purposes) knowing
how over-budget a project is, just isn't helpful information, because the project that's $1 over budget will be canceled on the merits and the project that's $10,000,000 will be canceled on the merits. In order to assess whether there's bias, we need to know information about what fraction of each party's over-budget projects were canceled, not how over-budget the canceled ones were.