Announcement, 11/3/08: Welcome Test Prep New York experts!

prep question


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Verbal & Essays -> Critical Reasoning
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jc114
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 53

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 1 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:29 pm    Post subject: prep question Reply with quote

Connsumers in California seeking personal loans have fewer banks to turn than do consumers elsewhere in the US. This shortage of competion among banks explains why interest rates on personal loans in California are higher than in any other region of the US.
Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the conclusion above?

A. Because of the comparatively high wayes they must pay to attract qualified workers, California banks charge depositors more than banks elsewhere do for many of the services they offer.
B. Personal loans are risker than other types of loans, such as home mortgage loans, that banks make.
C. Since bank deposits in California are covered by the same type of insurnance that guarentees bank deposit in other parts of the United States, they are no less secure than deposits elsewhere
D. The proportion of consumers who default on their personal loans is lower in California than in any other region of the US
E. Interest rates paid by California banks to depositors are lower than those paid by banks in other parts of the US because in California there is less competition to attract depositors

In the passage, does the shortage of competition among banks mean that there is no competition? I am a bit confused
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
guynoor
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 10 Feb 2007
Posts: 59

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 1 times in 1 posts


PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is the answer A?
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
jc114
Rising GMAT Star


Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 53

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 1 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 2:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes, the answer is A...could you explain for me pls?
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
jayhawk2001
Moderator


Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 789

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 11 times in 11 posts

Location: Silicon valley, California

PostPosted: Thu May 10, 2007 9:14 pm    Post subject: Re: prep question Reply with quote

jc114 wrote:
Connsumers in California seeking personal loans have fewer banks to turn than do consumers elsewhere in the US. This shortage of competion among banks explains why interest rates on personal loans in California are higher than in any other region of the US.
Which of the following, if true, most substantially weakens the conclusion above?

A. Because of the comparatively high wayes they must pay to attract qualified workers, California banks charge depositors more than banks elsewhere do for many of the services they offer.
B. Personal loans are risker than other types of loans, such as home mortgage loans, that banks make.
C. Since bank deposits in California are covered by the same type of insurnance that guarentees bank deposit in other parts of the United States, they are no less secure than deposits elsewhere
D. The proportion of consumers who default on their personal loans is lower in California than in any other region of the US
E. Interest rates paid by California banks to depositors are lower than those paid by banks in other parts of the US because in California there is less competition to attract depositors

In the passage, does the shortage of competition among banks mean that there is no competition? I am a bit confused


The claim is shortage of competition is the reason for the higher
interest rates on loans


If we can provide an alternative reason for why interest rates are higher,
it would weaken the argument.

A does this by telling us that higher wages is the reason for the higher
interest rate.

B and C are out of scope

D does not weaken the argument. If the number of people defaulting
on loans is less, banks would love to give their money and there
might hence be a larger number of banks

E tells us something different i.e. interest paid to depositors - not
interest rates on loans
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Verbal & Essays -> Critical Reasoning All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.