Welcome! Check out our free B-School Guides to learn how you compare with other applicants.
Login or Register
 

PR - main point

This topic has 1 member reply
confuse mind GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
Joined
19 Jan 2011
Posted:
462 messages
Followed by:
4 members
Thanked:
10 times
PR - main point Post Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:42 pm
Elapsed Time: 00:00
  • Lap #[LAPCOUNT] ([LAPTIME])
    Despite quantum leaps in transportation technology in the twentieth century, laws regarding cargo found at sea have remained virtually unchanged since the seventeenth century. Flotsam (floating cargo from a shipwrecked vessel), jetsam (sunken cargo thrown overboard to lighten a distressed vessel), and lagan (discarded underwater cargo marked with a buoy for subsequent retrieval) all belong, according to maritime law, to the original owner no matter how long the cargo remain in the water. Discarded cargo of any type can be held for salvage; the owner may then claim it if they pay an equitable reward to the finder. If, after a reasonable time, the owners fail to appear, the salvager may claim the cargo as his or her own.

    The advent of the airplane brought about a new legal dilemma: were salvage laws applicable to cargo retrieved from an airplane downed at sea? According to judicial decisions in the United States, such cargo is placed under appropriate maritime laws as long as it is found in navigable waters. But this should come as no surprise to students of American jurisprudence, since previous United States court rulings have absurdly applied salvage laws to money found on a body floating in a lake. No doubt future American judges will allow cargo salvaged in space to fall under these same laws.



    The author of the passage is primarily concerned with


    explaining a widely disputed point of law


    refuting critics of current maritime law


    tracing the origins of modern maritime law


    describing a point of law and its modern applications


    presenting a case against current maritime law



    IMO - E OA - D Please explain

    Need free GMAT or MBA advice from an expert? Register for Beat The GMAT now and post your question in these forums!
    confuse mind GMAT Destroyer! Default Avatar
    Joined
    19 Jan 2011
    Posted:
    462 messages
    Followed by:
    4 members
    Thanked:
    10 times
    Post Fri Aug 03, 2012 9:47 pm
    another question - same RC


    The author of the passage concludes which of the following about current maritime law?


    It has drawbacks that are far outweighed by its benefits.


    It seems unlikely to change in the near future.


    It will require complete revision if it is to remain useful.


    It is no longer relevant in light of current technology.


    It cannot be made to apply to space-age technology.


    IMO - D OA - B

    Best Conversation Starters

    1 varun289 42 topics
    2 guerrero 21 topics
    3 sana.noor 20 topics
    4 killerdrummer 18 topics
    5 sanaa.rizwan 14 topics
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Members...

    Most Active Experts

    1 image description Brent@GMATPrepNow

    GMAT Prep Now Teacher

    202 posts
    2 image description GMATGuruNY

    The Princeton Review Teacher

    140 posts
    3 image description Anju@Gurome

    Gurome

    113 posts
    4 image description Jim@StratusPrep

    Stratus Prep

    92 posts
    5 image description Jon@Admissionado

    Admissionado

    45 posts
    See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts