Brutal SC #30

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 175
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2007 12:01 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members

Brutal SC #30

by jangojess » Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:43 am
Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he also won the loyalty of its citizens: the invading Danes were well aware of this weakness and used it to their advantage in 893.

(A) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he
(B) The fact that King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886 did not mean that he had
(C) Just because King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he
(D) The fact that King Alfred occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean that he
(E) Just because King Alfred had occupied and fortified London in 886, it did not mean he

OA : B
Trying hard!!!

Moderator
Posts: 772
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 6:29 pm
Followed by:6 members

by BTGmoderatorRO » Tue Nov 14, 2017 10:58 am
Option A. 'Just because'? there are proper 'starters' than this. And it is not a proper idiom.This option is incorrect.

Option B. This option fully explains how 'King Alfred occupied and fortified London', in a simple and clear term. This makes the option perfect choice and thus it is the correct option.

Option C. Two irregularities were spotted in this option, first is the absence of 'had' to introduce the act.Also the use of 'it' sounds awkward and does not fits where it occupies in the middle of the sentence.

Option D. This option suffers the same fate as the option B, because 'it' does not fits where it occupies.

Option E. This option suffers the same fate as option A because of the use of 'Just because' it sounds so awkward to begin a statement in such a manner. This option is also guilty of the use of 'it' which was a major problem in option C.