Hi, This is from MCAT Question.
Can you please help me on solving this question.
Steps Followed :: I tried to rephrase the question , Essentially the question is -1<X<1 ?
St 1:: If X is +ve, X < 1
if X is _ve, -x/X < -x
so 1/x <-1 (Dividing -x on both the sides) Is this correct ?
-1< x or X > -1 NS
St 2:: X is +ve, It cannot happen |X| >x
but if x is negative , x < -x ..I got stuck here. and I thought This is also not sufficient
After this, I thought C is also not sufficient so I chose E . Can you please help., What is my mistake in Statement 2.
Is |X| < 1 ?
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:08 pm
- Followed by:2 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi kamalakarthi,
This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES and Number Properties.
We're told that X cannot equal 0. We're asked if |X| is less than 1. This is a YES/NO question.
1) X/|X| < X
From a Number Property standpoint, there are specific values of X that will 'fit' this inequality:
-Any positive number greater than 1.
-Any negative fraction (re: -1 < X < 0)
For example, IF....
X = 2.... 2/|2| = 1 < 2 and the answer to the question is NO.
X = -1/2.... (-1/2)/|-1/2| = -1 < -1/2 and the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
2) |X| > X
From a Number Property standpoint, there are specific values of X that will 'fit' this inequality:
-Any negative value
For example, IF....
X = -1/2.... |-1/2| > -1/2 and the answer to the question is YES.
X = -2... |-2| > -2 and the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT
Combined, there is only one specific type of value that will fit BOTH Facts: negative fractions (-1 < X < 0), so the answer to the question will be ALWAYS YES.
Combined, SUFFICIENT
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES and Number Properties.
We're told that X cannot equal 0. We're asked if |X| is less than 1. This is a YES/NO question.
1) X/|X| < X
From a Number Property standpoint, there are specific values of X that will 'fit' this inequality:
-Any positive number greater than 1.
-Any negative fraction (re: -1 < X < 0)
For example, IF....
X = 2.... 2/|2| = 1 < 2 and the answer to the question is NO.
X = -1/2.... (-1/2)/|-1/2| = -1 < -1/2 and the answer to the question is YES.
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
2) |X| > X
From a Number Property standpoint, there are specific values of X that will 'fit' this inequality:
-Any negative value
For example, IF....
X = -1/2.... |-1/2| > -1/2 and the answer to the question is YES.
X = -2... |-2| > -2 and the answer to the question is NO.
Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT
Combined, there is only one specific type of value that will fit BOTH Facts: negative fractions (-1 < X < 0), so the answer to the question will be ALWAYS YES.
Combined, SUFFICIENT
Final Answer: C
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Here's one way:
S1:
Since |x| must be > 0, we can safely multiply both sides by it:
x < x * |x|
Now subtract x from both sides:
0 < x * |x| - x
Now factor out x:
0 < x * (|x| - 1)
This gives us two possibilities:
(i) x AND |x| - 1 are both positive
OR
(ii) x and |x| - 1 are both negative
(i) reduces to |x| - 1 > 0, or |x| > 1, or x > 1
(ii) reduces to |x| - 1 < 0, or |x| < 1, or -1 < x < 0
So IF x is negative, then |x| < 1. This helps, but isn't sufficient on its own. (It does reduce the question to "Is x < 0?", though!)
S2:
|x| > x
This obviously won't be true if x ≥ 0 (since, if x ≥ 0, |x| = x). So x < 0. This is great ... but not on its own!
Together, though, we're set. S1 reduces the prompt to "Is x < 0?" and S2 answers that question in the affirmative.
S1:
Since |x| must be > 0, we can safely multiply both sides by it:
x < x * |x|
Now subtract x from both sides:
0 < x * |x| - x
Now factor out x:
0 < x * (|x| - 1)
This gives us two possibilities:
(i) x AND |x| - 1 are both positive
OR
(ii) x and |x| - 1 are both negative
(i) reduces to |x| - 1 > 0, or |x| > 1, or x > 1
(ii) reduces to |x| - 1 < 0, or |x| < 1, or -1 < x < 0
So IF x is negative, then |x| < 1. This helps, but isn't sufficient on its own. (It does reduce the question to "Is x < 0?", though!)
S2:
|x| > x
This obviously won't be true if x ≥ 0 (since, if x ≥ 0, |x| = x). So x < 0. This is great ... but not on its own!
Together, though, we're set. S1 reduces the prompt to "Is x < 0?" and S2 answers that question in the affirmative.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Another way, if the first is too technical:
S1:
x > x / |x|
|x| * x > x
Now take two cases. If x > 0, then we divide both sides to get |x| > 1.
If x < 0, then we divide both sides to get |x| < 1.
So |x| will be < 1 if and only if x < 0.
S2 I'd treat the same way I did in my post above, and much like that one, we'll arrive at the same conclusion: S1 simplifies the question and S2 answers that simplified question, leaving us with an answer of C.
S1:
x > x / |x|
|x| * x > x
Now take two cases. If x > 0, then we divide both sides to get |x| > 1.
If x < 0, then we divide both sides to get |x| < 1.
So |x| will be < 1 if and only if x < 0.
S2 I'd treat the same way I did in my post above, and much like that one, we'll arrive at the same conclusion: S1 simplifies the question and S2 answers that simplified question, leaving us with an answer of C.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:08 pm
- Followed by:2 members
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780