If x > y, is |x| > |y|?
(1) x > 0
(2) y > 0
Source : Math Revolution
OA=B
If x > y, is |x| > |y|? (1) x > 0 (2)
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 5:34 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:4 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
HI ziyuenlau,
This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES.
We're told that X > Y. We're asked if |X| > |Y|. This is a YES/NO question.
1) X > 0
IF....
X = 1, Y = 0, then the answer to the question is YES
X = 1, Y = -2, then the answer to the question is NO
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
2) Y > 0
Here, since Y is POSITIVE, X must ALSO be positive. Since we already know that X > Y, dealing with two POSITIVE values means that |X| will ALWAYS be greater than |Y|. Thus the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.
Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT
Final Answer: B
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
This question can be solved by TESTing VALUES.
We're told that X > Y. We're asked if |X| > |Y|. This is a YES/NO question.
1) X > 0
IF....
X = 1, Y = 0, then the answer to the question is YES
X = 1, Y = -2, then the answer to the question is NO
Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT
2) Y > 0
Here, since Y is POSITIVE, X must ALSO be positive. Since we already know that X > Y, dealing with two POSITIVE values means that |X| will ALWAYS be greater than |Y|. Thus the answer to the question is ALWAYS YES.
Fact 2 is SUFFICIENT
Final Answer: B
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
It can be helpful when approaching a DS yes/no question to ask yourself: when would we get a NO answer?
In this case, when would the absolute value of x *NOT* be greater than y, if x itself is greater than y?
The only time that would be the case is if y is a negative number further away from 0 than x (whether x is positive or negative). If they were both positive, x would have to be further from 0 than y is, i f x > y. So we could rephrase the question as:
Is y positive?
If you frame the question that way before looking at the statements, it's clear that statement 1 is insufficient, but statement 2 is sufficient.
In this case, when would the absolute value of x *NOT* be greater than y, if x itself is greater than y?
The only time that would be the case is if y is a negative number further away from 0 than x (whether x is positive or negative). If they were both positive, x would have to be further from 0 than y is, i f x > y. So we could rephrase the question as:
Is y positive?
If you frame the question that way before looking at the statements, it's clear that statement 1 is insufficient, but statement 2 is sufficient.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education