Estimated difficulty level: 650
Answer: BIf x < 3, is (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3?
(1) x < 2
(2) x > -1
Cheers,
Brent
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
If x < 3, is (x + 1)/(x - 3)
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Here's one I just made up.
Estimated difficulty level: 650
Cheers,
Brent
Estimated difficulty level: 650
Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
-
DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
Brent original!Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Here's one I just made up.
Estimated difficulty level: 650
Answer: BIf x < 3, is (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3?
(1) x < 2
(2) x > -1
Cheers,
Brent
We could always do a little number-picking.
S1: Say x = 0; (x + 1)/(x - 3) = 1/-3 = -(1/3). Not greater than 1/3 so we get a NO.
x = -10; (x + 1)/(x - 3) = -9/-13 = 9/13. Greater than 1/3, so we get a YES. S1 is not sufficient.
S2: We already know that x = 0 gives us a NO. What about 1? (x + 1)/(x - 3) = 2/-2 = -1. Not greater than 1/3. Again, we get a NO. Not a coincidence.
If -1 < x < 3, the numerator will always be positive and the denominator will always be negative, so we're dealing with a negative number, which, of course, is less than 1/3. Because the answer is always NO, this statement alone is sufficient. Answer is B
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Given: x < 3Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:If x < 3, is (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3?
(1) x < 2
(2) x > -1
Target question: Is (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3?
This is a good candidate for rephrasing the target question.
Aside: Here's a video with tips on rephrasing the target question: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1100
Since x < 3, we know that (x - 3) will always be NEGATIVE.
So, let's take (x + 1)/(x - 3) > 1/3, and multiply both sides by (x - 3)
We get: x + 1 < (1/3)(x - 3) [ASIDE: since we multiplied both sides by a NEGATIVE value, we REVERSED the inequality sign]
Now take x + 1 < (1/3)(x - 3) and multiply both sides by 3 to get: 3(x + 1) < x - 3
Expand to get: 3x + 3 < x - 3
Subtract x from both sides: 2x + 3 < -3
Subtract 3 from both sides: 2x < -6
Divide both sides by 2 to get: x < -3
This equivalent inequality is much easier to work with. So, ....
REPHRASED target question: Is x < -3?
Statement 1: x < 2
There are several values of x that satisfy statement 1. Here are two:
Case a: x = -7, in which case x < -3
Case b: x = 0, in which case x > -3
Since we cannot answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: x > -1
If x is greater than -1, then we can be 100% certain that x IS NOT less than -3
Since we can answer the REPHRASED target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer: B
Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
