If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 4:38 am
Thanked: 1 times
If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?

1) x>3

2) x^2>9

3) |x-1|>2

A) 1 only

B) 2 only

C) 1 and 2 only

D) 2 and 3 only

E) 1,2, and 3

OAD

Please explain how come 3 is possible?

Thanks,

Sid

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Nov 24, 2016 12:18 pm
GMATsid2016 wrote:If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?

1) x>3

2) x^2>9

3) |x-1|>2

A) 1 only
B) 2 only
C) 1 and 2 only
D) 2 and 3 only
E) 1,2, and 3
When solving inequalities involving ABSOLUTE VALUE, there are 2 things you need to know:
Rule #1: If |something| < k, then -k < something < k
Rule #2: If |something| > k, then EITHER something > k OR something < -k
Note: these rules assume that k is positive


Given: |x| > 3
Applying Rule #2, we get: EITHER x > 3 OR x < -3

Now check the statements...

1) x > 3
This ignores the possibility that x < -3
For example, x could equal -4, in which case statement 1 is NOT TRUE
ELIMINATE answer choices A, C and E

Important: Check out the two remaining answer choices: B) 2 only and D) 2 and 3 only
Since both remaining answer choices tell us that statement 2 is true, we need not check statement 2.
So, we need only check statement 3...

3) |x-1|>2
Applying Rule #2, we get:
EITHER x - 1 > 2 OR x - 1 < -2
Consider both cases:
case a) x - 1 > 2
Add 1 to both sides to get x > 3

case b) x - 1 < -2
Add 1 to both sides to get x < -1

So...EITHER x > 3 OR x < -1
Well, the first part, x > 3, matches the one part of the conclusion we reached from the given information.
But what about x < -1?
Well, if we already know from the given information that x < -3, then we can be certain that x < -1.
So, statement 3 must be TRUE

Answer: D

RELATED VIDEO
- Inequalities and absolute value: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat ... /video/985
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Thu Nov 24, 2016 7:46 pm
Hi Sid,

Certain Quant questions can be solved by using 'brute force' - you don't need to do any advanced math, you just need to do enough basic calculations to prove whatever pattern(s) the question is based on.

Here, we're dealing with Absolute Values, so you should be looking for at least 2 different 'groups' of numbers that fit the given inequality.

With |X| > 3, you likely see the 'obvious' group... X > 3. However, you also have to spot the other group of numbers that fit this inequality: X < -3.

Knowing those two options, you can quickly prove that Roman Numeral 1 is NOT always true but that Roman Numeral 2 IS always true. With Roman Numeral 3, you might not be sure, but you can prove that it IS always true with some brute force math...

From the information in the prompt, we can know that we have to consider X > 3 and X < -3. Plug as many of those values into Roman Numeral 3 as you like and then document the results. For example...

What happens when...
X = 4 or 5
X = 3.01

What happens when...
X = -4 or -5
X = -3.01

You'll find that with EVERY example that fits the given restrictions, Roman Numeral 3 IS true. That proof confirms that Roman Numeral 3 is part of the correct answer.

Final Answer: D

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:49 am
One way: Try some numbers

If |x| > 3, then we either have x > 3 or -3 > x

Trying x > 3, we could use x = 4. |4 - 1| > 2, so we're set.

Trying -3 > x, we could use x = -4. |-4 - 1| > 2, so we're set.

Looks good on both sides, so we'd feel relatively comfortable guessing this works.

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Nov 25, 2016 2:51 am
Another way: Thinking about absolute values

|x - 1| > 2 is another way of saying "The distance from x to 1 is greater than two". So whatever x is, it's more than two units away from 1 on the number line.

|x| > 3 is the same as |x - 0| > 3, or "The distance from x to 0 is greater than three". But this is the same as our first statement! If you're more than two units from 1, you're also more than 3 units from 0, since the distance from 0 to 1 is itself one.

So the statements are identical, and we're set.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1462
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:34 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 39 times
Followed by:22 members

by Jeff@TargetTestPrep » Tue Nov 29, 2016 3:47 pm
GMATsid2016 wrote:If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?

1) x>3

2) x^2>9

3) |x-1|>2

A) 1 only

B) 2 only

C) 1 and 2 only

D) 2 and 3 only

E) 1,2, and 3

OAD
|x| > 3 is equivalent to x > 3 OR x < -3. Let's now examine each answer choice.

1) x > 3

Since x > 3 or x < -3, x does not have to be greater than 3. Answer choice 1 is not necessarily true.

2) x^2 > 9

If x > 3, then x^2 > 9, and if x < -3, then x^2 > 9. Answer choice 2 is true.

3) |x - 1| > 2

Recall that |x| > 3 is equivalent to x > 3 or x < -3. Let's examine each of these two cases for the given inequality.

Case 1: x > 3

If x > 3, then x - 1 > 2. If a quantity is greater than a positive number, its absolute value is also greater than that positive number. Thus, |x - 1| > 2.

Case 2: x < -3

If x < -3, then x - 1 < -4. If a quantity is less than a negative number, its absolute value is actually greater than the absolute value of the negative number.

Thus |x - 1| > |-4|, i.e., |x - 1| > 4. Since |x - 1| > 4, that means |x - 1| > 2.

Therefore, we see that in either case, |x - 1| > 2. Answer choice 3 is also true.

Answer: D

Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:21 am
Thanked: 1 times

by vs224 » Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:23 am
Brent's answer
case b) x - 1 < -2
Add 1 to both sides to get x < -3

So...EITHER x > 3 OR x < -3
Perfect! This matches our original inequality.
So, statement 3 must be TRUE

case b) x - 1 < -2
should not add 1 to both side is x < -1

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:34 am
Good catch, vs224!
I have edited my response accordingly (but the answer is still D)

Cheers and thanks,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3008
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
Location: Grand Central / New York
Thanked: 470 times
Followed by:34 members

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Sat Jan 21, 2017 12:19 am
GMATsid2016 wrote:If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?

1) x>3

2) x^2>9

3) |x-1|>2

A) 1 only

B) 2 only

C) 1 and 2 only

D) 2 and 3 only

E) 1,2, and 3

OAD

Please explain how come 3 is possible?

Thanks,

Sid
3) |x-1|>2 can be written as x-1 > 2 => x > 3 OR x-1 < -2 (notice the sign-reversal of the inequality)

=> x > 3 OR x-1 < -2 => x < -1

If x < -1, we can say x < -3 must be true.

Thus, x > 3 OR x > -3

=> |x| > 3.

Hope this helps!

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Vienna | Kuala Lumpur | Sydney | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Sat Jan 21, 2017 10:56 am
Hi All,

When a question includes an absolute value, you have to keep your mind open to the idea that there are probably going to be multiple answers (or multiple GROUPS of answers) that fit the given information. In Roman Numeral questions, it helps to pay attention to how the answer choices are written (since you can often avoid some of the 'work' by noting which answers can be eliminated at certain points in the process).

Here, we're told that |X| > 3. This means that any number that is EITHER greater than 3 OR less than -3 will fit the given inequality. We have to consider both possibilities, since the question asks which of the following MUST be true.

I: X > 3

Since X could be -4, Roman Numeral I is NOT always true.
Eliminate Answers A, C and E.

At this point, we can tell from the remaining two answer choices that Roman Numeral II MUST be true (since it occurs in both of the remaining answers). However, here is the proof that it's true....

II: X^2 > 9

Squaring any number GREATER than 3 will result in a number that is GREATER than 9
Squaring any number LESS than -3 will result in a number that is GREATER than 9
Roman Numeral II IS always true.

III: |X - 1| > 2

IF.... X > 3, then |X - 1| will be greater than |2|.
IF... X < -3, then |X - 1| will be greater than |-4| = |4|.
Roman Numeral III IS always true.

Final Answer: D

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image