If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?
1) x>3
2) x^2>9
3) |x-1|>2
A) 1 only
B) 2 only
C) 1 and 2 only
D) 2 and 3 only
E) 1,2, and 3
OAD
Please explain how come 3 is possible?
Thanks,
Sid
If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 39
- Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 4:38 am
- Thanked: 1 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
When solving inequalities involving ABSOLUTE VALUE, there are 2 things you need to know:GMATsid2016 wrote:If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?
1) x>3
2) x^2>9
3) |x-1|>2
A) 1 only
B) 2 only
C) 1 and 2 only
D) 2 and 3 only
E) 1,2, and 3
Rule #1: If |something| < k, then -k < something < k
Rule #2: If |something| > k, then EITHER something > k OR something < -k
Note: these rules assume that k is positive
Given: |x| > 3
Applying Rule #2, we get: EITHER x > 3 OR x < -3
Now check the statements...
1) x > 3
This ignores the possibility that x < -3
For example, x could equal -4, in which case statement 1 is NOT TRUE
ELIMINATE answer choices A, C and E
Important: Check out the two remaining answer choices: B) 2 only and D) 2 and 3 only
Since both remaining answer choices tell us that statement 2 is true, we need not check statement 2.
So, we need only check statement 3...
3) |x-1|>2
Applying Rule #2, we get:
EITHER x - 1 > 2 OR x - 1 < -2
Consider both cases:
case a) x - 1 > 2
Add 1 to both sides to get x > 3
case b) x - 1 < -2
Add 1 to both sides to get x < -1
So...EITHER x > 3 OR x < -1
Well, the first part, x > 3, matches the one part of the conclusion we reached from the given information.
But what about x < -1?
Well, if we already know from the given information that x < -3, then we can be certain that x < -1.
So, statement 3 must be TRUE
Answer: D
RELATED VIDEO
- Inequalities and absolute value: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat ... /video/985
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Sun Dec 18, 2016 7:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Sid,
Certain Quant questions can be solved by using 'brute force' - you don't need to do any advanced math, you just need to do enough basic calculations to prove whatever pattern(s) the question is based on.
Here, we're dealing with Absolute Values, so you should be looking for at least 2 different 'groups' of numbers that fit the given inequality.
With |X| > 3, you likely see the 'obvious' group... X > 3. However, you also have to spot the other group of numbers that fit this inequality: X < -3.
Knowing those two options, you can quickly prove that Roman Numeral 1 is NOT always true but that Roman Numeral 2 IS always true. With Roman Numeral 3, you might not be sure, but you can prove that it IS always true with some brute force math...
From the information in the prompt, we can know that we have to consider X > 3 and X < -3. Plug as many of those values into Roman Numeral 3 as you like and then document the results. For example...
What happens when...
X = 4 or 5
X = 3.01
What happens when...
X = -4 or -5
X = -3.01
You'll find that with EVERY example that fits the given restrictions, Roman Numeral 3 IS true. That proof confirms that Roman Numeral 3 is part of the correct answer.
Final Answer: D
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Certain Quant questions can be solved by using 'brute force' - you don't need to do any advanced math, you just need to do enough basic calculations to prove whatever pattern(s) the question is based on.
Here, we're dealing with Absolute Values, so you should be looking for at least 2 different 'groups' of numbers that fit the given inequality.
With |X| > 3, you likely see the 'obvious' group... X > 3. However, you also have to spot the other group of numbers that fit this inequality: X < -3.
Knowing those two options, you can quickly prove that Roman Numeral 1 is NOT always true but that Roman Numeral 2 IS always true. With Roman Numeral 3, you might not be sure, but you can prove that it IS always true with some brute force math...
From the information in the prompt, we can know that we have to consider X > 3 and X < -3. Plug as many of those values into Roman Numeral 3 as you like and then document the results. For example...
What happens when...
X = 4 or 5
X = 3.01
What happens when...
X = -4 or -5
X = -3.01
You'll find that with EVERY example that fits the given restrictions, Roman Numeral 3 IS true. That proof confirms that Roman Numeral 3 is part of the correct answer.
Final Answer: D
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
One way: Try some numbers
If |x| > 3, then we either have x > 3 or -3 > x
Trying x > 3, we could use x = 4. |4 - 1| > 2, so we're set.
Trying -3 > x, we could use x = -4. |-4 - 1| > 2, so we're set.
Looks good on both sides, so we'd feel relatively comfortable guessing this works.
If |x| > 3, then we either have x > 3 or -3 > x
Trying x > 3, we could use x = 4. |4 - 1| > 2, so we're set.
Trying -3 > x, we could use x = -4. |-4 - 1| > 2, so we're set.
Looks good on both sides, so we'd feel relatively comfortable guessing this works.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Another way: Thinking about absolute values
|x - 1| > 2 is another way of saying "The distance from x to 1 is greater than two". So whatever x is, it's more than two units away from 1 on the number line.
|x| > 3 is the same as |x - 0| > 3, or "The distance from x to 0 is greater than three". But this is the same as our first statement! If you're more than two units from 1, you're also more than 3 units from 0, since the distance from 0 to 1 is itself one.
So the statements are identical, and we're set.
|x - 1| > 2 is another way of saying "The distance from x to 1 is greater than two". So whatever x is, it's more than two units away from 1 on the number line.
|x| > 3 is the same as |x - 0| > 3, or "The distance from x to 0 is greater than three". But this is the same as our first statement! If you're more than two units from 1, you're also more than 3 units from 0, since the distance from 0 to 1 is itself one.
So the statements are identical, and we're set.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Jeff@TargetTestPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:34 am
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 39 times
- Followed by:22 members
|x| > 3 is equivalent to x > 3 OR x < -3. Let's now examine each answer choice.GMATsid2016 wrote:If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?
1) x>3
2) x^2>9
3) |x-1|>2
A) 1 only
B) 2 only
C) 1 and 2 only
D) 2 and 3 only
E) 1,2, and 3
OAD
1) x > 3
Since x > 3 or x < -3, x does not have to be greater than 3. Answer choice 1 is not necessarily true.
2) x^2 > 9
If x > 3, then x^2 > 9, and if x < -3, then x^2 > 9. Answer choice 2 is true.
3) |x - 1| > 2
Recall that |x| > 3 is equivalent to x > 3 or x < -3. Let's examine each of these two cases for the given inequality.
Case 1: x > 3
If x > 3, then x - 1 > 2. If a quantity is greater than a positive number, its absolute value is also greater than that positive number. Thus, |x - 1| > 2.
Case 2: x < -3
If x < -3, then x - 1 < -4. If a quantity is less than a negative number, its absolute value is actually greater than the absolute value of the negative number.
Thus |x - 1| > |-4|, i.e., |x - 1| > 4. Since |x - 1| > 4, that means |x - 1| > 2.
Therefore, we see that in either case, |x - 1| > 2. Answer choice 3 is also true.
Answer: D
Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]
See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews
Brent's answer
case b) x - 1 < -2
Add 1 to both sides to get x < -3
So...EITHER x > 3 OR x < -3
Perfect! This matches our original inequality.
So, statement 3 must be TRUE
case b) x - 1 < -2
should not add 1 to both side is x < -1
case b) x - 1 < -2
Add 1 to both sides to get x < -3
So...EITHER x > 3 OR x < -3
Perfect! This matches our original inequality.
So, statement 3 must be TRUE
case b) x - 1 < -2
should not add 1 to both side is x < -1
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Good catch, vs224!
I have edited my response accordingly (but the answer is still D)
Cheers and thanks,
Brent
I have edited my response accordingly (but the answer is still D)
Cheers and thanks,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Jay@ManhattanReview
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3008
- Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:19 am
- Location: Grand Central / New York
- Thanked: 470 times
- Followed by:34 members
3) |x-1|>2 can be written as x-1 > 2 => x > 3 OR x-1 < -2 (notice the sign-reversal of the inequality)GMATsid2016 wrote:If |x|>3, which of the following must be true?
1) x>3
2) x^2>9
3) |x-1|>2
A) 1 only
B) 2 only
C) 1 and 2 only
D) 2 and 3 only
E) 1,2, and 3
OAD
Please explain how come 3 is possible?
Thanks,
Sid
=> x > 3 OR x-1 < -2 => x < -1
If x < -1, we can say x < -3 must be true.
Thus, x > 3 OR x > -3
=> |x| > 3.
Hope this helps!
-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep
Locations: New York | Vienna | Kuala Lumpur | Sydney | and many more...
Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi All,
When a question includes an absolute value, you have to keep your mind open to the idea that there are probably going to be multiple answers (or multiple GROUPS of answers) that fit the given information. In Roman Numeral questions, it helps to pay attention to how the answer choices are written (since you can often avoid some of the 'work' by noting which answers can be eliminated at certain points in the process).
Here, we're told that |X| > 3. This means that any number that is EITHER greater than 3 OR less than -3 will fit the given inequality. We have to consider both possibilities, since the question asks which of the following MUST be true.
I: X > 3
Since X could be -4, Roman Numeral I is NOT always true.
Eliminate Answers A, C and E.
At this point, we can tell from the remaining two answer choices that Roman Numeral II MUST be true (since it occurs in both of the remaining answers). However, here is the proof that it's true....
II: X^2 > 9
Squaring any number GREATER than 3 will result in a number that is GREATER than 9
Squaring any number LESS than -3 will result in a number that is GREATER than 9
Roman Numeral II IS always true.
III: |X - 1| > 2
IF.... X > 3, then |X - 1| will be greater than |2|.
IF... X < -3, then |X - 1| will be greater than |-4| = |4|.
Roman Numeral III IS always true.
Final Answer: D
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
When a question includes an absolute value, you have to keep your mind open to the idea that there are probably going to be multiple answers (or multiple GROUPS of answers) that fit the given information. In Roman Numeral questions, it helps to pay attention to how the answer choices are written (since you can often avoid some of the 'work' by noting which answers can be eliminated at certain points in the process).
Here, we're told that |X| > 3. This means that any number that is EITHER greater than 3 OR less than -3 will fit the given inequality. We have to consider both possibilities, since the question asks which of the following MUST be true.
I: X > 3
Since X could be -4, Roman Numeral I is NOT always true.
Eliminate Answers A, C and E.
At this point, we can tell from the remaining two answer choices that Roman Numeral II MUST be true (since it occurs in both of the remaining answers). However, here is the proof that it's true....
II: X^2 > 9
Squaring any number GREATER than 3 will result in a number that is GREATER than 9
Squaring any number LESS than -3 will result in a number that is GREATER than 9
Roman Numeral II IS always true.
III: |X - 1| > 2
IF.... X > 3, then |X - 1| will be greater than |2|.
IF... X < -3, then |X - 1| will be greater than |-4| = |4|.
Roman Numeral III IS always true.
Final Answer: D
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich