Leo can buy a certain computer for p1 dollars in State A

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 335
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 11:31 pm
Location: Australia / India
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:2 members
Leo can buy a certain computer for p1 dollars in State A, where the sales tax is t1 percent, or he can buy the same computer for p2 dollars in State B, where the sales tax is t2 percent. Is the total cost of the computer greater in State A than in State B ?

(1) t1 > t2
(2) p1t1 > p2t2

Please help me with this problem. I am still unsure about Statement 2. As per my understanding the tax cannot be zero and all numbers must be positive. The question is asking about the cost i.e. total. So it must be that cost in State A is greater than cost in State B regardless of how small or large p1t1 is :?: Is there a logical conclusion we can come to without testing numbers?

Thanks

OA is E

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Nov 15, 2016 4:32 am
Leo can buy a certain computer for p1 dollars in State
A, where the sales tax is t1 percent, or he can buy the
same computer for p2 dollars in State B, where the
sales tax is t2 percent. Is the total cost of the
computer greater in State A than in State B ?
(1) t1 > t2
(2) p1t1 > p2t2
To save time, try to plug in combinations that satisfy both statements.

Case 1:
Let p� = 100 and t� = 20, so that p�t� = 100*20 = 2000.
Let pâ‚‚ = 100 and tâ‚‚ = 10, so that pâ‚‚tâ‚‚ = 100*10 = 1000.
A = p� + (t�% of p�) = 100 + (20% of 100) = 120.
B = pâ‚‚ + (tâ‚‚% of pâ‚‚) = 100 + (10% of 100) = 110.
Result:
A>B.

Since A>B in Case 1, the goal in Case 2 is to find values such that A<B.
In Case 1, p�t� = 2000.
To make A<B, try to increase pâ‚‚tâ‚‚ to a value just below 2000.

Case 2:
To goal is to find a combination such that A
Let p� = 100 and t� = 20, so that p�t� = 100*20 = 2000.
Let pâ‚‚ = 190 and tâ‚‚ = 10, so that pâ‚‚tâ‚‚ = 190*10 = 1900.
A = p� + (t�% of p�) = 100 + (20% of 100) = 120.
B = pâ‚‚ + (tâ‚‚% of pâ‚‚) = 190 + (10% of 190) = 209.
Result:
A<B.

Since A>B in Case 1, but A<B in Case 2, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is E.

Algebraically:

Total cost in A = p� + (t�% of p�) = p� + (t�/100)p�
Total cost in B = pâ‚‚ + (tâ‚‚% of pâ‚‚) = pâ‚‚ + (tâ‚‚/100)pâ‚‚

Question stem:
p� + (t�/100)p� > p₂ + (t₂/100)p₂ ?
p� + (p�t�)/100 > p₂ + (p₂t₂)/100 ?

When the statements are combined, we know that (p�t�)/100 > (p₂t₂)/100, but we cannot determine the relationship between the portions in red.
Thus, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1462
Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:34 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 39 times
Followed by:22 members

by Jeff@TargetTestPrep » Wed Nov 16, 2016 8:10 am
melguy wrote:Leo can buy a certain computer for p1 dollars in State A, where the sales tax is t1 percent, or he can buy the same computer for p2 dollars in State B, where the sales tax is t2 percent. Is the total cost of the computer greater in State A than in State B ?

(1) t1 > t2
(2) p1t1 > p2t2
We are given that in State A a computer costs p1 dollars with t1 percent sales tax. Thus, the total cost of the computer in State A is:

(p1) + (p1)(t1)

We are also given that in State B a computer costs p2 dollars with t2 percent sales tax. Thus, the total cost of the computer in State B is:

(p2) + (p2)(t2)

We need to determine the following:

Is (p1) + (p1)(t1) > (p2) + (p2)(t2) ?

Statement One Alone:

t1 > t2

Statement one simply tells us that the sales tax rate is greater in State A than in State B. Since we have no information about p1 or p2, statement one is not enough information to determine whether (p1) + (p1)(t1) > (p2) + (p2)(t2).

Statement Two Alone:

p1t1 > p2t2

Statement two tells us only that the amount of sales tax for the computer is greater in State A than the sales tax amount in State B. Since we have no information about p1 or p2, statement two is not enough information to determine whether (p1) + (p1)(t1) > (p2) + (p2)(t2).

Statements One and Two Together:

Using our two statements, we can add together our inequalities and we have:

p1t1 > p2t2

+ t1 > t2

= p1t1 + t1 > p2t2 + t2

Although it may seem like we have enough information, we must remember that p1t1 + t1 > p2t2 + t2 is NOT the same as the inequality (p1) + (p1)(t1) > (p2) + (p2)(t2) in question.

We also could recognize that without knowing the selling price of the computer in the two locations, we can't answer the question. For example, if p1 = $100 and t1 = 8%, the cost of the computer will be $100 + $8 = $108 in State A; if p2 = $200 and t2 = 1%, the cost of the computer in State B will be $200 + $2.00 = $202. However, if p1 = $300 and t1 = 5%, the cost of the computer will be $300 + $15 = $315 in State A; if p2 = $100 and t2 = 4%, the cost of the computer will be $100 + $4.00 = $104 in State B. In the first scenario, State A's computer costs less than State B's computer. In the second, State B's computer costs less than State A's computer.

Therefore, we still don't have enough information to answer the question.

Answer: E

Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews