Welcome to Beat The GMAT, the world's largest GMAT & MBA forum. Please join our rich community of friendly members. Get free help from
experts who teach at the leading GMAT & MBA prep companies — Kaplan, Veritas Prep, Manhattan GMAT and Stacy Blackman Consulting.

Announcement: Apply for the Beat The GMAT/Veritas Prep MBA Fast Track Scholarship, featuring $20,000 in prizes.

500 ds


 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Math -> Data Sufficiency
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dunkin77
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 01 Apr 2007
Posts: 269

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 3:00 pm    Post subject: 500 ds Reply with quote

Hi,

Pls see the attached.

I thought the answer was C) but turned out to be B).

Can anyone pls explain? thanks!

This post contains an attachment. You must be logged in to download/view this file.
Please login or register as a user.

Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
jayhawk2001
Moderator


Joined: 28 Jan 2007
Posts: 789

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 11 times in 11 posts

Location: Silicon valley, California

PostPosted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We have to use properties of similar triangles here. Draw lines
from B and C to the ground. Lets call these points D and E respectively
on the ground. BD and CE are parallel

We are given that AB = BC.

(2) says that BD = 5. We can use properties of similar triangles now.
BD / CE = AB / AC. We can hence compute CE

So B is the correct answer.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
dunkin77
Really wants to Beat The GMAT!


Joined: 01 Apr 2007
Posts: 269

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for explanation Jay.

I am still a bit confused cause we only know AB=AC and BD=5,
so, BD / CE = AB / AC (let's say AB=AC=3)

5 / CE = 3 / 3

5/CE=1

CE=5..........?? Crying or Very sad

I would appreciate it if you could explain a bit more... thanks again for your help!!
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
gabriel
Managing Director


Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 770

Thanks given: 96
Thanked 23 times in 22 posts

Location: India

PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dunkin77 wrote:
Thanks for explanation Jay.

I am still a bit confused cause we only know AB=AC and BD=5,
so, BD / CE = AB / AC (let's say AB=AC=3)

5 / CE = 3 / 3

5/CE=1

CE=5..........?? Crying or Very sad

I would appreciate it if you could explain a bit more... thanks again for your help!!



dunkin u have got evrything right except for the part that AB= AC ... AB is actually = BC ... therefore AC=2AB ... so we have 5/CE = AB/AC .... 5/CE = 1/2 .. therefore CE = 10 .. hence the answer is B
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
vk.neni
Just gettin' started!


Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Posts: 12

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,
Couldn't we solve this using information in (i) x=30? With this info the small triangle (ABD) becomes a 30-60-90 and we know the length of one of the sides, so we can figure the other two sides. Once, we've this info, we can use the similar triangle method to solve it. So, the answer would be D.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
myprepgmat
Just gettin' started!


Joined: 10 Mar 2007
Posts: 2

Thanks given: 0
Thanked 0 times in 0 posts


PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 6:06 am    Post subject: Re: 500 ds Reply with quote

Ans is B

I'll explain...

Let the height of point B is h and the point is H. Let the length of seesaw ie AC is 2d..

Now draw perpendicular lines to ground from point B and C. Let they intersect at ground at D ( from Point B) & E(point C).

Now we will get two similar triangles.. ie ABD and ACE..

we have BD/AB = CE/AC

ie h/d= H/2d given AB=BC we assumed AC=2d

i.e. h=H/2

given h=5ft

therefore H=10ft

case 1 doesnot give any unique value as the length of AC or height of the point B is not given.
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
gabriel
Managing Director


Joined: 20 Dec 2006
Posts: 770

Thanks given: 96
Thanked 23 times in 22 posts

Location: India

PostPosted: Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

vk.neni wrote:
Hi,
Couldn't we solve this using information in (i) x=30? With this info the small triangle (ABD) becomes a 30-60-90 and we know the length of one of the sides, so we can figure the other two sides. Once, we've this info, we can use the similar triangle method to solve it. So, the answer would be D.


dude one of the most basic mistake for a DS... carrying information from one statement to the other .. the length of the side is mentioned only in the second statement.. so cant use it for the first ..
Back to top


View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Beat The GMAT Forum Index -> GMAT Math -> Data Sufficiency All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum



"GMAT" and other GMAC™ trademarks are registered trademarks of the Graduate Management Admission Council™. The Graduate Management Admission Council™ does not endorse, nor is it affiliated in any way with the owner or any content on this website. The opinions expressed here are solely those of the author or those of the members of this website. Copyright © 2008 BTG Test Prep, LLC. Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.