166. What is the value of x + y in the figure above?
(1) w = 95
(2) z = 125
Is there a simpler way to solve this question?
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 11:38 pm
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:4 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
- Attachments
-
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Target question: What is the value of x + y?
Statement 1: w = 95
Important: For geometry DS questions, we are typically checking to see whether the statements "lock" a particular angle or length into having just one value. This concept is discussed in much greater detail in our free video: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat- ... cy?id=1103
If w = 95, then the angle inside the quadrilateral must be 85.
So, those 2 angles (95 and 85) are "locked." In other words, the 2 lines that create those two angles are locked in place to create the 95- and 85-degree angles.
However, line1 is not locked into place, so we can still move it, which means we can freely alter the size of angle y.
As such, the value of x + y will vary.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: z = 125
If z = 125, then the angle inside the quadrilateral must be 55.
Since line2 is not locked into place, we can still move it, which means we can freely alter the size of angle x.
As such, the value of x + y will vary.
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1 and 2 combined:
We now have the following:
Since all angles in a quadrilateral add to 360 degrees, we know that 85 + 55 + j + k = 360
If we solve for j + k, we get: j + k = 220
Also notice that, since angles x and k are on a line, it must be true that x + k = 180.
Similarly, it must be true that y + j = 180
If we combine both of these equations, we get: x + y + j + k = 360
Since we already know that j + k = 220, we can replace j + k with 220, to get:
x + y + 220 = 360
This means x + y = 140
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT
Answer = C
Cheers,
Brent
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Thu Apr 19, 2018 2:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 6:53 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
One more way to do this :-
Let the interior angles be a,b,c,d in the clockwise direction.
Then a+b+c+d = 360 ...(a closed quadrilateral adds angle to 360)
So, (180-x) + (180-y) + (180-w) + (180-z) = 360
720 - (x+y+w+z) = 360
x+y+w+z = 360
x + y = 360 - (w + z) ... We need to know the values of w and z to get x + y
(a) w = 95
Not Sufficient since we need value of z.
(b) z = 125
Not Sufficient since we need value of w.
(a) and (b)
Sufficient.
Answer C
Let the interior angles be a,b,c,d in the clockwise direction.
Then a+b+c+d = 360 ...(a closed quadrilateral adds angle to 360)
So, (180-x) + (180-y) + (180-w) + (180-z) = 360
720 - (x+y+w+z) = 360
x+y+w+z = 360
x + y = 360 - (w + z) ... We need to know the values of w and z to get x + y
(a) w = 95
Not Sufficient since we need value of z.
(b) z = 125
Not Sufficient since we need value of w.
(a) and (b)
Sufficient.
Answer C
If you cant explain it simply you dont understand it well enough!!!
- Genius
- Genius
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 9:13 am
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Dear All,
Request you to please guide me how can we assume it to be quadrilateral when it is not that the two lines are parallel . As we have learnt in the basic that we should not assume seeing the figure then can we infer that the two lines are parallel.
Request you to please guide me how can we assume it to be quadrilateral when it is not that the two lines are parallel . As we have learnt in the basic that we should not assume seeing the figure then can we infer that the two lines are parallel.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
There need not be any parallel sides for a shape to be a quadrilateral.[email protected] wrote:Dear All,
Request you to please guide me how can we assume it to be quadrilateral when it is not that the two lines are parallel . As we have learnt in the basic that we should not assume seeing the figure then can we infer that the two lines are parallel.
A quadrilateral is any 4-sided polygon.
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Ganesh's solution is my recommended approach on this question!GaneshMalkar wrote:One more way to do this :-
Let the interior angles be a,b,c,d in the clockwise direction.
Then a+b+c+d = 360 ...(a closed quadrilateral adds angle to 360)
So, (180-x) + (180-y) + (180-w) + (180-z) = 360
720 - (x+y+w+z) = 360
x+y+w+z = 360
x + y = 360 - (w + z) ... We need to know the values of w and z to get x + y
(a) w = 95
Not Sufficient since we need value of z.
(b) z = 125
Not Sufficient since we need value of w.
(a) and (b)
Sufficient.
Answer C
On DS geometry questions, a lot of students get into trouble if they begin by plugging the statement information into the figure right away. If there is a given figure, it's much better to make any and all inferences you can before looking at the statements. Otherwise, you might think that you need statement information that was already inferable from the figure.
Here's an example of a DS geometry problem that student often get wrong if they don't make inferences first:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/area-of-the- ... tml#719010
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education