Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect. However, when running toward an insect, the beetles intermittently stop, and then, a moment later, resume their attack. Perhaps they cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest; but an alternative hypothesis is that while running tiger beetles are unable to process the resulting rapidly changing visual information, and so quickly go blind and stop.
Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
A. When a prey insect is moved directly toward a beetle that has been chasing it, the beetle immediately turns and runs away without its usual intermittent stopping.
B. In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.
C. The beetles maintain a fixed time interval between pauses, although when an insect that had been stationary begins to flee, the beetle increases its speed after its next pause.
D. If, when a beetle pauses, it has not gained on the insect it is pursuing, the beetle generally ends its pursuit.
E. When an obstacle is suddenly introduced just in front of running beetles, the beetles sometimes stop immediately, but they never respond by running around the barrier.
OA C
My explanation
Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect.
However, when running toward an insect, the beetles intermittently stop, and then, a moment later, resume their attack.
Theory1: Perhaps they cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest;
Theory2: while running tiger beetles are unable to process the resulting rapidly changing visual information, and so quickly go blind and stop.
Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
A. When a prey insect is moved directly toward a beetle that has been chasing it, the beetle immediately turns and runs away without its usual intermittent stopping.
(Does not fit as insect is moving towards the beetle. OFS)
D. If, when a beetle pauses, it has not gained on the insect it is pursuing, the beetle generally ends its pursuit.
Ending a pursuit is neither mentioned nor favorable to any one of the thesis.
E. When an obstacle is suddenly introduced just in front of running beetles, the beetles sometimes stop immediately, but they never respond by running around the barrier.
(Response to suddenly introduced obstacles is out of scope.)
I got struck between B and C.
B. In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.
(I chose B as I felt it pauses because of its visual blurr)
C. The beetles maintain a fixed time interval between pauses, although when an insect that had been stationary begins to flee, the beetle increases its speed after its next pause.
(This supports the first theory but how can think we that the beetle increases its speed after its next pause. )
can someone explain why B is wrong and C is right?
Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they_Gmat prep
This topic has expert replies
- conquistador
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2014 4:00 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- Followed by:1 members
- MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
This goes against both. If the beetle were not able to see without pausing it would not immediately turn. If it needed to rest it would pause when it runs away as it does when it runs toward.Mechmeera wrote: My explanation
Tiger beetles are such fast runners that they can capture virtually any nonflying insect.
However, when running toward an insect, the beetles intermittently stop, and then, a moment later, resume their attack.
Theory1: Perhaps they cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest;
Theory2: while running tiger beetles are unable to process the resulting rapidly changing visual information, and so quickly go blind and stop.
Which of the following, if discovered in experiments using artificially moved prey insects, would support one of the two hypotheses and undermine the other?
A. When a prey insect is moved directly toward a beetle that has been chasing it, the beetle immediately turns and runs away without its usual intermittent stopping.
(Does not fit as insect is moving towards the beetle. OFS)
If beetle responds immediately to changes in the insect's direction, it must not have trouble seeing. If it had trouble seeing, it would often only after pausing respond to changes in direction. So this goes against both.D. If, when a beetle pauses, it has not gained on the insect it is pursuing, the beetle generally ends its pursuit.
Ending a pursuit is neither mentioned nor favorable to any one of the thesis.
E. When an obstacle is suddenly introduced just in front of running beetles, the beetles sometimes stop immediately, but they never respond by running around the barrier.
(Response to suddenly introduced obstacles is out of scope.)
I got struck between B and C.
can someone explain why B is wrong and C is right?
B. In pursuing a moving insect, the beetles usually respond immediately to changes in the insect's direction, and pause equally frequently whether the chase is up or down an incline.
(I chose B as I felt it pauses because of its visual blurr)
This goes against the first theory, because the beetle must not need rest or it would need more frequent pauses at higher speed. It supports the second theory, because the beetle does not change pace until pausing, possibly indicating that not until the beetle pauses does it see that the insect has started to flee.C. The beetles maintain a fixed time interval between pauses, although when an insect that had been stationary begins to flee, the beetle increases its speed after its next pause.
(This supports the first theory but how can think we that the beetle increases its speed after its next pause. )
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 3:53 pm
I had this question in OG 2016. they changed the correct answer to
"In pursuing a swerving insect, a beetle alters its course while running and its pauses become more frequent as the chase progresses.
I don't understand how this strengthens the second hypothesis and undermines the first one. Can someone help?
"In pursuing a swerving insect, a beetle alters its course while running and its pauses become more frequent as the chase progresses.
I don't understand how this strengthens the second hypothesis and undermines the first one. Can someone help?
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
In pursuing a swerving insect, a beetle alters its course while running.selina.yang wrote:I had this question in OG 2016. they changed the correct answer to
"In pursuing a swerving insect, a beetle alters its course while running and its pauses become more frequent as the chase progresses.
I don't understand how this strengthens the second hypothesis and undermines the first one. Can someone help?
Since the beetle is able to ALTER ITS COURSE in response to a SWERVING insect, the hypothesis that running tiger beetles are unable to process rapidly changing visual information is WEAKENED.
Its pauses become more frequent as the chase progresses.
Here, the beetle finds it increasingly difficult to maintain its pace as the CHASE PROGRESSES, with the result that its pauses become MORE FREQUENT -- information that STRENGTHENS the hypothesis that beetles cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Thu Feb 11, 2016 3:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2015 3:53 pm
Thanks, but seems the explanation in OG is opposite. It says, this one strengthens the second hypothesis: the beetle's pauses increase as the variety of visual information that it needs to deal with increases. This makes me confused.GMATGuruNY wrote:In pursuing a swerving insect, a beetle alters its course while running.selina.yang wrote:I had this question in OG 2016. they changed the correct answer to
"In pursuing a swerving insect, a beetle alters its course while running and its pauses become more frequent as the chase progresses.
I don't understand how this strengthens the second hypothesis and undermines the first one. Can someone help?
Since the beetle is able to ALTER ITS COURSE in response to a SWERVING insect, the hypothesis that running tiger beetles are unable to process rapidly changing visual information is WEAKENED.
Its pauses become more frequent as the chase progresses.
Here, the beetle finds it increasingly difficult to maintain its pace as the CHASE PROGRESSES, with the result that its pauses become MORE FREQUENT -- information that STRENGTHENS the hypothesis that beetles cannot maintain their pace and must pause for a moment's rest.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The explanation in the OG seems faulty.selina.yang wrote:Thanks, but seems the explanation in OG is opposite. It says, this one strengthens the second hypothesis: the beetle's pauses increase as the variety of visual information that it needs to deal with increases. This makes me confused.
According to the OA, a beetle in pursuit of a swerving insect is able to alter its course WHILE RUNNING.
This information undermines the second hypothesis, which contends that rapidly changing visual information causes tigers beetles to GO BLIND AND STOP.
A blind beetle cannot alter its course while running.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3