Art historian- CR Assumption

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:58 pm
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:530

Art historian- CR Assumption

by vishalwin » Sat Nov 21, 2015 2:19 am
Art historian: Great works of art have often elicited
outrage when first presented; in Europe,
Stravinsky's Rite of Spring prompted a riot, and
Manet's Déjeuner sur l'herbe elicited outrage
and derision. So, since it is clear that art is often
shocking, we should not hesitate to use public
funds to support works of art that many people
find shocking.


Which one of the following is an assumption that the
art historian's argument requires in order for its
conclusion to be properly drawn?



(A) Most art is shocking.

(B) Stravinsky and Manet received public funding
for their art.

(C) Art used to be more shocking than it currently
is.

(D) Public funds should support art.

(E) Anything that shocks is art.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:58 pm
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:530

by vishalwin » Sun Nov 22, 2015 6:06 am
Instructors Please help!

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Nov 22, 2015 8:42 am
vishalwin wrote:Art historian: Great works of art have often elicited
outrage when first presented; in Europe,
Stravinsky's Rite of Spring prompted a riot, and
Manet's Déjeuner sur l'herbe elicited outrage
and derision. So, since it is clear that art is often
shocking, we should not hesitate to use public
funds to support works of art that many people
find shocking.

Which one of the following is an assumption that the
art historian's argument requires in order for its
conclusion to be properly drawn?

(A) Most art is shocking.

(B) Stravinsky and Manet received public funding
for their art.

(C) Art used to be more shocking than it currently
is.

(D) Public funds should support art.

(E) Anything that shocks is art.
Premise: Art is often shocking.
Conclusion: Public funds should be used to support art that many people find shocking.

Apply the NEGATION TEST.
When the correct answer choice is negated, the conclusion will be invalidated.

Answer choices, negated:
Most art is not shocking.
Stravinsky and Manet did not receive public funding for their art.
Art did not used to be more shocking than it currently is.
Public funds should not support art.
Not everything that shocks is art.


Only the negation in red invalidates the conclusion that public funds should be used to support art that many people find shocking.
Thus, D is the correct assumption: WHAT MUST BE TRUE for the conclusion to be valid.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3