Absolute value and squaring

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 6:00 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Absolute value and squaring

by infiniti007 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 3:13 pm
Is |xy| > x²y²?

1.) 0 < x² < 1/4
2.) 0 < y² < 1/9

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Sep 26, 2015 3:41 pm
infiniti007 wrote:Is |xy| > x²y²?

1.) 0 < x² < 1/4
2.) 0 < y² < 1/9
|xy| > x²y² only if x and y are NONZERO, with the result that both sides of the inequality are POSITIVE.
Since |xy| > x²y² only if both sides are positive, we can safely square the inequality:
(|xy|)² > (x²y²)²
x²y² > x�y�.

Since x and y are nonzero, x²y²>0.
Thus, we can safely divide each side by x²y²:
x²y²/x²y² > x�y�/x²y²
1 > x²y².

Question stem, rephrased:
Is x²y² < 1?

Statement 1: 0 < x² < 1/4
If x² = 1/10 and y² = 1/10, then x²y² < 1.
If x² = 1/10 and y² = 100, then x²y² > 1.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: 0 < y² < 1/9
If y² = 1/10 and x² = 1/10, then x²y² < 1.
If y² = 1/10 and x² = 100, then x²y² > 1.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Since x² and y² are both POSITIVE FRACTIONS, x²y² < 1.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 6:00 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by infiniti007 » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:33 pm
|xy| > x²y² only if x and y are NONZERO, with the result that both sides of the inequality are POSITIVE.
Since |xy| > x²y² only if both sides are positive, we can safely square the inequality:
(|xy|)² > (x²y²)²
x²y² > x�y�.
I may be understanding this incorrectly. I understand the inequality would not hold if x and y are each equal to 0. What if x and y were each equal to -1? Or what about x and y each equal to 1? Wouldn't these values not hold also?

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Sep 26, 2015 4:48 pm
infiniti007 wrote:
|xy| > x²y² only if x and y are NONZERO, with the result that both sides of the inequality are POSITIVE.
Since |xy| > x²y² only if both sides are positive, we can safely square the inequality:
(|xy|)² > (x²y²)²
x²y² > x�y�.
I may be understanding this incorrectly. I understand the inequality would not hold if x and y are each equal to 0. What if x and y were each equal to -1? Or what about x and y each equal to 1? Wouldn't these values not hold also?
Our concern is not the value of each side but the SIGN of each side.

Example: x>y
Here, the signs of x and y are unknown.
For this reason, we CANNOT simply square both sides and conclude that x² > y².
If x=1 and y=-10, then x>y but x² < y².

Problem above: |xy| > x²y²
Here, |xy| > x²y² requires that both x and y be NONZERO.
As a result, |xy| > 0 and x²y² > 0.
Since both sides of the inequality must be POSITIVE, we can safely square the inequality.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 10:58 pm
Thanked: 12 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:530

by vishalwin » Sun Sep 27, 2015 5:47 am
Hello,

I have a doubt:

is it true |x| = root (x)


Thanks
Vishal

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Sep 27, 2015 5:53 am
vishalwin wrote:Hello,

I have a doubt:

is it true |x| = root (x)


Thanks
Vishal
|x| = √(x²).
The reason is that √ means the POSITIVE ROOT ONLY.

Example: x=-4
|x| = |-4| = 4.
√(x²) = √((-4)²) = √16 = the positive square root of 16 = 4.
Thus:
|x| = √(x²).
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3