If the equation is |x-3| = 3-x
How does this get rephrased to x <= 3?
I understand to solve the equation we take (x-3), both positive and negative. Right?
When (x-3) is positive, x-3= 3-x
2x = 6, therefore x=3
When (x-3) is negative, -x+3=3-x
0=0?
So, the question is how the equation become x <= 3. How does '=' become '<='?
Similar issue,
From x^3(1-x^2)<0, how do we can get -1<x<0?
If I plug values, it makes sense, but not sure how to derive this using algebra. Can someone please explain?
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Inequality - Concept
-
kevincanspain
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
- Location: madrid
- Thanked: 171 times
- Followed by:64 members
- GMAT Score:790
You are on the right track: let's start with a definition |z| = z for all z >= 0 and |z| =-z for all z < 0robosc9 wrote:If the equation is |x-3| = 3-x
How does this get rephrased to x <= 3?
I understand to solve the equation we take (x-3), both positive and negative. Right?
When (x-3) is positive, x-3= 3-x
2x = 6, therefore x=3
When (x-3) is negative, -x+3=3-x
0=0?
So, the question is how the equation become x <= 3. How does '=' become '<='?
Similar issue,
From x^3(1-x^2)<0, how do we can get -1<x<0?
If I plug values, it makes sense, but not sure how to derive this using algebra. Can someone please
explain?
You were right to consider the cases when x-3 is positive or negative, but what about zero?
If x - 3 >= 0, we get x - 3 = 3 - x i.e. x =3
If x - 3 < 0 (i.e. x < 3) , we get 3 - x = 3 - x , which is always true, no matter the value of x on this interval
Thus x < 3 or x = 3. We write the solution set as x <=3
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Anurag@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3835
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 10:00 pm
- Location: Milpitas, CA
- Thanked: 1854 times
- Followed by:523 members
- GMAT Score:770
Kevin has explained the first query, so I'm not repeating the same.
Let me shed some light on your second query.
Hope this helps.
Let me shed some light on your second query.
As the product of x³ and (1 - x²) is negative, the signs of x³ and (1 - x²) must be opposite. Hence, any one of the following two cases is possible,robosc9 wrote:From x^3(1-x^2)<0, how do we can get -1<x<0?
- 1. x³ > 0 and (1 - x²) < 0
2. x³ < 0 and (1 - x²) > 0
- # x³ > 0 implies x > 0
# (1 - x²) < 0 implies x² > 1, i.e. either x > 1 or x < -1
But x must be greater than 0, hence x > 1
- # x³ < 0 implies x < 0
# (1 - x²) > 0 implies x² < 1, i.e. -1 < x < 1
But x must be less than 0, hence -1 < x < 0
Hope this helps.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Another approach: determine the critical points -- the points at which x³(1-x²) = 0.robosc9 wrote:
Similar issue,
From x^3(1-x^2)<0, how do we can get -1<x<0?
If I plug values, it makes sense, but not sure how to derive this using algebra. Can someone please explain?
Factoring 1-x², we get:
x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0.
The critical points are x=0, x=-1, and x=1.
These are the only values for x at which x³(1+x)(1-x) = 0.
To determine the range of x, try one value to the left and right of each critical point.
x<-1:
Plugging x=-2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(-2)³(1+(-2))*(1-(-2)) < 0.
-8 * -1 * 3 < 0.
24<0.
Doesn't work.
x<-1 is NOT part of the range.
-1<x<0:
Plugging x=-1/2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(-1/2)³(1+(-1/2))*(1-(-1/2)) < 0.
(-1/8)*(1/2)*(3/2) < 0.
-3/32<0.
This works.
-1<x<0 IS part of the range.
0<x<1
Plugging x=1/2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(1/2)³(1+(1/2))*(1-(1/2)) < 0.
(1/8)*(3/2)*(1/2) < 0.
3/32<0.
Doesn't work.
0<x<1 is NOT part of the range.
x>1
Plugging x=2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(2)³(1+2)(1-2) < 0.
8*3*(-1) < 0.
-24<0.
This works.
x>1 IS part of the range.
Thus, -1<x<0 OR x>1.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Thanks, it's clear now! I have always been confused about this!kevincanspain wrote:
You were right to consider the cases when x-3 is positive or negative, but what about zero?
If x - 3 >= 0, we get x - 3 = 3 - x i.e. x =3
I like your approach too, but how do we determine these critical points and how do we decide which is a better way to solve a question (critical points/algebra)?GMATGuruNY wrote:
Another approach: determine the critical points -- the points at which x³(1-x²) = 0.
In my other question:
|x-3| = 3-x
Are the two critical points are x>=0 and x<3. Are there any more?
-
baladon99
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:06 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Modulus of any number is always positive or zero.robosc9 wrote:I like your approach too, but how do we determine these critical points and how do we decide which is a better way to solve a question (critical points/algebra)?GMATGuruNY wrote:
Another approach: determine the critical points -- the points at which x³(1-x²) = 0.
In my other question:
|x-3| = 3-x
Are the two critical points are x>=0 and x<3. Are there any more?
So R.H.S of the eqn |x-3| = 3-x is +ve or 0
3-x >= 0
x-3<= 0
x<=3
-
shankar.ashwin
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2010 8:06 am
- Thanked: 230 times
- Followed by:21 members
Mitch could you please help us on this one, after we find the critical points of an inequality and arrange them in ascending order and test for values to the left and right of these points, Does the inequality signs always alternate? I saw a few posts and in most of them they did. In this case we have the following cases;
x<-1: - Does not satisfy
-1<x<0: - Satisfies
0<x<1 - Does not satisfy
x>1 - Satisfies.
Unless we are given absolute values, does this pattern always hold true? If I am not wrong critical points are nothing but roots of the equation when the function = 0.
x<-1: - Does not satisfy
-1<x<0: - Satisfies
0<x<1 - Does not satisfy
x>1 - Satisfies.
Unless we are given absolute values, does this pattern always hold true? If I am not wrong critical points are nothing but roots of the equation when the function = 0.
GMATGuruNY wrote:
Another approach: determine the critical points -- the points at which x³(1-x²) = 0.
Factoring 1-x², we get:
x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0.
The critical points are x=0, x=-1, and x=1.
These are the only values for x at which x³(1+x)(1-x) = 0.
To determine the range of x, try one value to the left and right of each critical point.
- Attachments
-
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
Most of the time they will alternate, but not always. For example, if you have this inequality, which I'll borrow from a high-level official question found in gmatfocus (so it's not some entirely irrelevant example) :shankar.ashwin wrote:Mitch could you please help us on this one, after we find the critical points of an inequality and arrange them in ascending order and test for values to the left and right of these points, Does the inequality signs always alternate? I saw a few posts and in most of them they did.
(x/3) + (3/x) > 2
There are two important things to notice here if you intend to use a critical point method.
First, the only value of x which makes (x/3) + (3/x) = 2 true is x = 3. Still, the inequality is true *both* when x > 3 and when 0 < x < 3; that is, it's true both to the left and to the right of x=3. So this is an example where the solutions do not alternate around the critical point.
Second, when finding critical points, you need to consider not only values of x which make both sides of the inequality equal, but also values of x which make one side of the inequality *undefined*. So here, since x is in a denominator, we have another critical point: x = 0. You can see how important it is to identify this critical point: if x < 0, the inequality is clearly false, and if x > 0 then the inequality is true, except when x=3.
In general, I think a critical point method is a perfectly good approach to many straightforward inequality questions which involve simple exponents or quadratics (though there are other equally good approaches you could use instead), but if you intend to use it on some of the more 'exotic' inequality questions that can appear at the high level of the test, there are complications that you may need to be aware of.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
-
kumadil2011
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:20 pm
Hi..Could you please advise, while finding critical points, is it necessary to check range between
-1<x<0 and 0<x<1 (Proper and improper fractions, both + and - ve)In all problems?
As i missed here, concluding the range only 1<x
**************************************************************************************************
-1<x<0:
Plugging x=-1/2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(-1/2)³(1+(-1/2))*(1-(-1/2)) < 0.
(-1/8)*(1/2)*(3/2) < 0.
-3/32<0.
This works.
-1<x<0 IS part of the range.
0<x<1
Plugging x=1/2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(1/2)³(1+(1/2))*(1-(1/2)) < 0.
(1/8)*(3/2)*(1/2) < 0.
3/32<0.
Doesn't work.
0<x<1 is NOT part of the range.
x>1
Plugging x=2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(2)³(1+2)(1-2) < 0.
8*3*(-1) < 0.
-24<0.
This works.
x>1 IS part of the range.
Thus, -1<x<0 OR x>1.
-1<x<0 and 0<x<1 (Proper and improper fractions, both + and - ve)In all problems?
As i missed here, concluding the range only 1<x
**************************************************************************************************
-1<x<0:
Plugging x=-1/2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(-1/2)³(1+(-1/2))*(1-(-1/2)) < 0.
(-1/8)*(1/2)*(3/2) < 0.
-3/32<0.
This works.
-1<x<0 IS part of the range.
0<x<1
Plugging x=1/2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(1/2)³(1+(1/2))*(1-(1/2)) < 0.
(1/8)*(3/2)*(1/2) < 0.
3/32<0.
Doesn't work.
0<x<1 is NOT part of the range.
x>1
Plugging x=2 into x³(1+x)(1-x) < 0, we get:
(2)³(1+2)(1-2) < 0.
8*3*(-1) < 0.
-24<0.
This works.
x>1 IS part of the range.
Thus, -1<x<0 OR x>1.
-
nikhilgmat31
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:25 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
[email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi nikhilgmat31,
You have to be very careful with these types of deductions and the work that you do. Your work PROVES that (X-3) could equal 0, but you wrote that (X-3) is NEGATIVE (which is NOT correct). On certain questions (typically DS questions), these types of little errors will lead to an incorrect answer and could cost you some serious points on Test Day.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
You have to be very careful with these types of deductions and the work that you do. Your work PROVES that (X-3) could equal 0, but you wrote that (X-3) is NEGATIVE (which is NOT correct). On certain questions (typically DS questions), these types of little errors will lead to an incorrect answer and could cost you some serious points on Test Day.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
nikhilgmat31
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:25 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
[email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi nikhilgmat31,
It's okay to make mistakes now, but you have to treat each of these little errors as an opportunity to improve. From what I've seen of your overall work in the Quant Forum here, you know a lot of the material really well and you have to potential to score at a really high level in the Quant section on Test Day. At a certain point though, one of the 'key' elements to raising your score even further will be your 'precision' and not your intelligence. That very precision will likely come down to the amount of work that you put on the pad (enough notes, labels, details, etc. to keep the little mistakes from happening.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
It's okay to make mistakes now, but you have to treat each of these little errors as an opportunity to improve. From what I've seen of your overall work in the Quant Forum here, you know a lot of the material really well and you have to potential to score at a really high level in the Quant section on Test Day. At a certain point though, one of the 'key' elements to raising your score even further will be your 'precision' and not your intelligence. That very precision will likely come down to the amount of work that you put on the pad (enough notes, labels, details, etc. to keep the little mistakes from happening.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
nikhilgmat31
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:25 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
Thanks Rich for guiding me. Sometimes to proceed faster in questions, we tend to bypass certain steps & miss variables sometimes.
Can you please provide me some good reference to counting & probability. I want to read these topics in detail.
Can you please provide me some good reference to counting & probability. I want to read these topics in detail.
