An epidemic is reported to have broken out in Florida. The number of detected
instances of a certain disease is reported to have increased by 85% in
the last year. What is the lowest number of newly detected instances possible?
(A) 1
(B) 5
(C) 11
(D) 15
(E) 17
OA E
Could you correct my mistakes,
Let X be the number of OLD Instances,
and N be the New Instances
and it has been increased by 85%
So N = X(185/100) ==> N = X(37/20)
to make N as low, then X should be 20 so N is 37 right ??
Regards,
Uva.
An epidemic is reported to have broken out in Florida.
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 3:24 pm
- Thanked: 115 times
- Followed by:3 members
X = no. of old instances = xUva@90 wrote:An epidemic is reported to have broken out in Florida. The number of detected
instances of a certain disease is reported to have increased by 85% in
the last year. What is the lowest number of newly detected instances possible?
(A) 1
(B) 5
(C) 11
(D) 15
(E) 17
OA E
Could you correct my mistakes,
Let X be the number of OLD Instances,
and N be the New Instances
and it has been increased by 85%
So N = X(185/100) ==> N = X(37/20)
to make N as low, then X should be 20 so N is 37 right ??
Regards,
Uva.
n = no. of this years instances = 1.85x
newly detected instances = 1.85x - x = 0.85x
0.85x = 85x/100 = 17x/20
since 17X/20 has to be an integer, the lowest number occurs when x =20
17x20/20 = 17
ans = e
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 3:24 pm
- Thanked: 115 times
- Followed by:3 members
Another way to look at this......
Old instances detected - x
New instances detected - 1.85x
1.85x = a + b
a = old instances that we detected previously
b = new instances that didnt exist previously
In order to find the lowest number of new instances (b), we have to maximize the no. of old instances (a).
a = x
therefore the lowest new instances occurs when 1.85x = x + b
b = 0.85x
b =(17/20)x
since b is an integer lowest occurs when x = 20
b =(17/20)*20 = 17
Hope this helps!
The question asks us to find the lowest no. of detected instances
Old instances detected - x
New instances detected - 1.85x
1.85x = a + b
a = old instances that we detected previously
b = new instances that didnt exist previously
In order to find the lowest number of new instances (b), we have to maximize the no. of old instances (a).
a = x
therefore the lowest new instances occurs when 1.85x = x + b
b = 0.85x
b =(17/20)x
since b is an integer lowest occurs when x = 20
b =(17/20)*20 = 17
Hope this helps!
The question asks us to find the lowest no. of detected instances
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi Uva@90,
Your approach is perfect, but you have to remember to answer the question that is ASKED.
Here, the question is: what is the lowest possible number of NEWLY detected instances of the disease. Using your example, there were 20 cases LAST YEAR and 17 more THIS YEAR. Thus, the number of NEWLY detected cases would be 17.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Your approach is perfect, but you have to remember to answer the question that is ASKED.
Here, the question is: what is the lowest possible number of NEWLY detected instances of the disease. Using your example, there were 20 cases LAST YEAR and 17 more THIS YEAR. Thus, the number of NEWLY detected cases would be 17.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- Uva@90
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:30 am
- Location: Chennai, India
- Thanked: 83 times
- Followed by:5 members
Rich,[email protected] wrote:Hi Uva@90,
Your approach is perfect, but you have to remember to answer the question that is ASKED.
Here, the question is: what is the lowest possible number of NEWLY detected instances of the disease. Using your example, there were 20 cases LAST YEAR and 17 more THIS YEAR. Thus, the number of NEWLY detected cases would be 17.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Wow! You got my mistake....
You are the BEST!
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Uva.
Known is a drop Unknown is an Ocean
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Let x = the number of cases at the beginning of this year.Uva@90 wrote:An epidemic is reported to have broken out in Florida. The number of detected
instances of a certain disease is reported to have increased by 85% in
the last year. What is the lowest number of newly detected instances possible?
(A) 1
(B) 5
(C) 11
(D) 15
(E) 17
Let n = the number of new cases.
Since the total number of cases increases by 85%, the number of new cases is equal to 85% of the number of cases at the beginning of this year:
n = (85/100)x = (17/20)x.
We can PLUG IN THE ANSWERS, which represent the least possible value of n.
When the correct value for n is plugged into n = (17/20)x, the value of x will be an INTEGER.
A: 1 = (17/20)x, implying that x = 20/17.
B: 5 = (17/20)x, implying that x = 100/17.
C: 11 = (17/20)x, implying that x = 220/17.
D: 15 = (17/20)x, implying that x = 300/17.
E: 17 = (17/20)x, implying that x = 20.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 518
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 8:25 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
great, you guys catch the statement correctly as number of newly cases.
it different new - old = 1.85x -x = .85
n=.85x
n must atleast 17
it different new - old = 1.85x -x = .85
n=.85x
n must atleast 17
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Jeff@TargetTestPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Thu Apr 09, 2015 9:34 am
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 39 times
- Followed by:22 members
The key to this problem is realizing that we must have whole number values for both the original number of detected diseases and this year's new number of cases. If we let the original number of detected diseases = n, then the new number of cases is:Uva@90 wrote:An epidemic is reported to have broken out in Florida. The number of detected
instances of a certain disease is reported to have increased by 85% in
the last year. What is the lowest number of newly detected instances possible?
(A) 1
(B) 5
(C) 11
(D) 15
(E) 17
1.85n = 185/100 x n = 37/20 x n = 37n/20
Since the fraction has been reduced to lowest terms, we see that for 37n/20 to be a whole number, then n must be at least 20.
Since 20 x 1.85 = 37, the minimum number of newly detected cases is 37 - 20 = 17 cases.
Answer: E
Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]
See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews