PS:Not able to derive final answer

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 9:19 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 1 times

PS:Not able to derive final answer

by dhiren8182 » Mon Jan 05, 2015 10:09 pm
Hi Guru(s),
If K is the sum of reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 43 to 48, inclusive, then K is closest in value to which of the following?

A. 1/12
B. 1/10
C. 1/8
D. 1/6
E. 1/4
OA is A
Not sure how to derive the final answer with approximation
Thanks
Dhiren

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2131
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
Thanked: 955 times
Followed by:140 members
GMAT Score:800

by MartyMurray » Mon Jan 05, 2015 11:01 pm
dhiren8182 wrote:Hi Guru(s),
If K is the sum of reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 43 to 48, inclusive, then K is closest in value to which of the following?

A. 1/12
B. 1/10
C. 1/8
D. 1/6
E. 1/4
OA is A
Not sure how to derive the final answer with approximation
Thanks
Dhiren
There are six integers in that set, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47 and 48. Now I was looking at the OA you gave and check this out.

The smallest possible reciprocal is 1/48. Even if all of them were 1/48, the total would be 6 x 1/48 = 6/48 = 1/8. Your OA is even less than 1/8. So it must be incorrect.

Anyway, we are on our way to solving this problem.

The answer has to be a little bigger than 1/8, since the other reciprocals, 1/43, 1/44 and so on, are bigger than 1/48. So let's see which answer is closest.

Hmm. I see a nice clean way to get the other end of the range.

If all of the integers were 42, then the reciprocals would all be 1/42 and the total would be 6/42 or 1/7. So the real answer is somewhere between 1/7 and 1/8.

As numbers get higher, the difference between reciprocals of numbers the same distance apart becomes less. The difference between 1/12 and 1/13 is much less than the difference between 1/2 and 1/3. So 1/7 is a little closer to 1/8 than it is to 1/6.

Do we even need to figure this out? Maybe not. Clearly this number is a fair amount smaller than 1/7.

In any case, the sum of the reciprocals is closer to 1/8 than it is to 1/6.

Choose C.


_________________
Marty Murray
GMAT Coach
[email protected]
https://infinitemindprep.com/
Last edited by MartyMurray on Thu Jan 08, 2015 11:47 pm, edited 3 times in total.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Tue Jan 06, 2015 12:51 am
dhiren8182 wrote: If K is the sum of reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 43 to 48, inclusive, then K is closest in value to which of the following?

A. 1/12
B. 1/10
C. 1/8
D. 1/6
E. 1/4
We want the approximate sum of 1/43 + 1/44 + 1/45 + . . . + 1/48

Let's make the following observations about the upper and lower bounds:
Upper bounds: If all 6 fractions were 1/43, the sum would be (6)(1/43) = 6/43 ~ 6/42 = 1/7
Lower bounds: If all 6 fractions were 1/48, the sum would be (6)(1/48) = 6/48 = 1/8

From this we can conclude that 1/8 < K < 1/7

If K is between 1/8 and 1/7, then K must be closer to 1/8 than it is to 1/6

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Tue Jan 06, 2015 2:42 am
dhiren8182 wrote:Hi Guru(s),
If K is the sum of reciprocals of the consecutive integers from 43 to 48, inclusive, then K is closest in value to which of the following?

A. 1/12
B. 1/10
C. 1/8
D. 1/6
E. 1/4
I received a PM about this problem.
My approach would be similar to Marty's and Brent's.

Determine the RANGE of the sum.

If all of the fractions were 1/43, the sum = 6(1/43) ≈ 6/42 = 1/7.
If all of the fractions were 1/48, the sum = 6(1/48) = 6/48 = 1/8.
Thus, the sum must be between 1/8 and 1/7.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2095
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Thanked: 1443 times
Followed by:247 members

by ceilidh.erickson » Wed Jan 07, 2015 9:00 am
To add a general rule: if a question asks you what a particular sum is "closest to," it's asking for an approximation. Never attempt to do the actual calculation! That would take far too long. The GMAT is really trying to assess whether you can find a logical pattern through which to approach the problem.

Taking the minimum and maximum of the range, as other experts have suggested, is the best approach. You could also have taken the reciprocal of the median of the range, and multiplied it by 6. In this case, though, the median was 45.5, so that makes for messy math. On a different problem, though, the median of an evenly-spaced set would be a good gage for approximating.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education